Literature DB >> 23369567

Generation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells using prostaglandin E2.

Nataša Obermajer1, Pawel Kalinski.   

Abstract

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are natural immunosuppressive cells and endogenous inhibitors of the immune system. We describe a simple and clinically compatible method of generating large numbers of MDSCs using the cultures of peripheral blood-isolated monocytes supplemented with prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). We observed that PGE2 induces endogenous cyclooxygenase (COX)2 expression in cultured monocytes, blocking their differentiation into CD1a+ dendritic cells (DCs) and inducing the expression of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1, IL-4Rα, nitric oxide synthase 2 and IL-10 - typical MDSC-associated suppressive factors. The establishment of a positive feedback loop between PGE2 and COX2, the key regulator of PGE2 synthesis, is both necessary and sufficient to promote the development of CD1a+ DCs to CD14+CD33+CD34+ monocytic MDSCs in granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor/IL-4-supplemented monocyte cultures, their stability, production of multiple immunosuppressive mediators and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-suppressive function. In addition to PGE2, selective E-prostanoid receptor (EP)2- and EP4-agonists, but not EP3/1 agonists, also induce the MDSCs development, suggesting that other activators of the EP2/4- and EP2/4-driven signaling pathway (adenylate cyclase/cAMP/PKA/CREB) may be used to promote the development of suppressive cells. Our observations provide a simple method for generating large numbers of MDSCs for the immunotherapy of autoimmune diseases, chronic inflammatory disorders and transplant rejection.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23369567      PMCID: PMC3560989          DOI: 10.1186/2047-1440-1-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Res        ISSN: 2047-1440


Biology of myeloid-derived suppressor cells

Dendritic cells (DCs) are key initiators and regulators of immune responses [1-3]. Therapeutic programming of DCs to suppress their function has been shown beneficial in autoimmunity and transplantation [4-6]. In contrast to DCs, suppressive macrophages [7] and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), originally shown to accumulate at the site of tumors, suppress the ability of CD8+ T cells to mediate effective responses against cancer cells, but can be beneficial in controlling autoimmune phenomena or transplant rejection [8-10]. MDSCs [10], important mediators of tumor-induced immune dysfunction and cancer progression [11], represent a heterogeneous population of immature myeloid cells (iMCs) involving precursors of macrophages, granulocytes, and DCs. MDSCs express CD34, common myeloid marker CD33, macrophage/DCs marker CD11b, and IL4Rα (CD124), but lack expression of the lineage (Lin) markers of DCs and other mature myeloid cells [10,12]. Human MDSCs are defined as CD33+Lin-HLA-DR-/low cells. Recent studies demonstrate that monocytic MDSCs from patients with melanoma [13], prostate cancer [14], gastrointestinal malignancies [15], hepatocellular carcinoma [16,17] and glioblastoma [18] show a CD14+CD11b+HLA-DRlow phenotype while neutrophil-related immature (i)MDSCs present in peripheral blood show CD15 expression [10]. MDSCs express high levels of immunosuppressive factors, such as indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) [19,20], IL-10 [12], arginase [21,22], inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS, NOS2) [22], nitric oxide, and reactive oxygen species [23] and use these molecules to suppress T-cell responses [24,25]. Their induction of natural killer cell anergy and reduced cytotoxicity is arginase-independent [16] but depends on transforming growth factor β1[26]. PD-L1/B7-H1, induced on MDSCs [27,28], suppresses antigen-specific immunity via interaction with regulatory T cells (Treg) [27], enhanced T cell IL-10 expression and reduced IFN-γ production [28]. The presence of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) at early stages of DC development was shown to suppresses the differentiation of human monocytes into functional T helper (Th)1-inducing CD1a+ DCs [29]. Additionally, PGE2 is needed for the development of tumor-associated suppressive macrophages [30-32]. Our two recent reports [33,34] demonstrate that PGE2 is both required and sufficient to redirect the differentiation of human dendritic cells into monocytic MDSCs. It also mediates the induction of MDSC-associated suppressive factors in human MDSCs [21] in a mechanism involving the establishment of a positive feedback loop between PGE2 and cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 [33], the key regulator of PGE2 production [35]. Additionally, PGE2 has been shown to enhance the numbers of MDSCs in mouse models and induce their expansion ex vivo[36-38].

In vitro generation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells

Recent work in mice demonstrated that functional MDSCs can be generated in vitro from mouse embryonic stem cells and bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells, resulting in two subpopulations - CD115+Ly-6C+ (equivalent to the monocytic Gr-1+CD115+F4/80+ MDSCs found in tumor-bearing mice) and CD115+Ly-6C- cells (resembling the granulocyte/macrophage progenitors) [37,39-41]. Adoptive transfer of these MDSCs prevented graft-versus-host disease mediated by alloreactive T cells. While granulocytic MDSCs may induce non-specific immune suppression and suppress the effector phase of the allogeneic immune response at an early stage, the monocytic MDSCs emerge as the key subset needed to promote Treg development and to establish long-term antigen-specific tolerance [37,39-41]. Another source of MDSCs is the bone marrow, which harbors a large reservoir of MDSCs. Recent studies have demonstrated an efficient growth factor/cytokine (granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) + G-CSF or GM-CSF + IL-6 or IL-13)-induced expansion of MDSCs populations in vitro, utilizing bone marrow cells from either mice or human sources [42,43] to generate IL4Rα+ MDSCs. In mice these cells were able to impair the priming of CD8+ T cells, and enabled long-term acceptance of pancreatic islet allografts [43]. Furthermore, bone marrow progenitor cells can be induced by lipopolysaccharide to develop into CD11b+Gr1intF4/80+ cells that, when adoptively transferred, suppressed allergen-induced airway inflammation in recipient mice [44]. Due to the massive accumulation of MDSCs in the spleens of tumor-bearing mice, the spleen is considered to be a reservoir of MDSCs and their precursors [45]. The drawback of these reported initiatives to develop MDSC-based therapeutic strategies is the lack of a reliable source of MDSCs. For human treatment regimens the control of MDSCs in vitro by manipulating recipient myelomonocytic precursor cells appears most applicable. While there are low frequency and total numbers of MDSCs in peripheral blood (approximately 5% of cells in healthy subjects), peripheral blood constitutes a very convenient source of myelomonocytic precursor cells for MDSC generation. Apart from the recently described cytokine regimens that showed the feasibility of in vitro expansion of blood-isolated MDSCs populations [46] the induction of human MDSCs has been proven a feasible in vitro approach for the generation of CD14+HLADRneg/low MDSCs by differentiation of isolated CD14+ cells in the presence of IL-4 + GM-CSF and tumor-derived microvesicles [46]. Alternatively, functional MDSCs can be induced in peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) cultures supplemented with several cytokine induction combinations, produced by tumor cell lines [47]. Our current data provides evidence for the feasibility of generating large numbers of monocytic MDSCs for the immunotherapy of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, or transplant rejection by using a single common determining factor - PGE2, a common inflammation-associated master regulator of immune responses - that can redirect the development of CD1a+ DCs to CD14+CD33+CD34+ monocytic MDSCs [48].

Efficient generation of human myeloid-derived suppressor cells using prostaglandin E2

The development of functional MDSCs requires the inhibition of development of immunostimulatory antigen presenting cells and concomitant induction of suppressive functions [8]. The expansion of iMCs can be induced by factors such as GM-CSF, IL-6, or vascular endothelial growth factor [24,49-51]. The upregulation of MDSC-associated immunosuppressive factors and establishment of their immunosuppressive function can be induced by such factors as IL-1β, IFNγ, PGE2, or Toll-like receptor ligands [8]. While the above MDSC-activating factors have apparently diverse character and functions, they all share the ability to induce COX2 expression and PGE2 production [52-54], suggesting the key role of COX2 and PGE2 in MDSCs development. Peripheral blood-derived monocytes provide a convenient source of cells for cellular therapy due to their relative abundance in the circulation. We used peripheral blood PBMCs, obtained from the blood of healthy donors (Central Blood Bank of Pittsburgh, PA) using lymphocyte separation medium, to isolate monocytes by positive magnetic selection using the CD14+ isolation kit (EasySep Isolation kit; Stem Cell Tech, Vancouver, Canada). Monocytes were cultured for 6 days in 12 or 24-well plates at 5 × 105 cells per well in rhuGM-CSF and IL-4 (both 1000 U/ml; gifts from Schering Plough, Kenilworth, NJ), with 10-6 M PGE2 (PGE2-induced MDSCs, Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) (Figure 1A). Alternatively, the E-prostanoid receptor (EP)2 agonist Butaprost (10 μM, Sigma) and the EP4 agonist CAY10598 (10 nM, Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) were used to generate MDSCs. EP2 and EP4 are the two subtypes of the G protein-coupled receptor, signaling of which is coupled to a rise in cAMP concentration [55]. As shown in Figure 1B, the yield of PGE2-induced MDSCs (CD1a-DCSIGN-CD14+CD33+CD34+CD80-CD83-) was similar to the yield of iDCs (CD1a+ DCSIGN+CD14-CD80-CD83-) and TNF-α-matured (rhuTNFα, 50 ng/ml, Strathmann Biotech, Germany) DCs (CD1a+ DCSIGN+CD14-CD80+CD83+).
Figure 1

Prostaglandin E-induced positive cyclooxygenase 2-prostaglandin E-E-prostanoid receptor 2/4 feedback loop allows for generation of high numbers of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and their functional stability. (A) Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) (via E-prostanoid receptor (EP)2- and EP4-dependent signals) drives the early induction of cyclooxygenase (COX)2 in local myeloid cells (monocytes, macrophages, immature dendritic cells (iDCs)), promoting their production of suppressive factors (indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO)1, IL-10, arginase 1, nitric oxide synthase (NOS)2, and PGE2 itself (current data and [48]), and acquisition of suppressive functions [48]. These processes are further amplified by the de novo production of endogenous PGE2, now produced at high levels by myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) themselves, thereby creating a positive feedback loop leading to persistence of MDSCs. The key role of the EP2- and EP4-mediated COX2-PGE2 feedback to control multiple aspects of MDSCs function provides convenient targets to generate MDSC-associated immune regulation in tolerogenic therapies. (B) PGE2 induces high numbers of MDSCs (48.6%), with yields similar to iDCs (40.2%) and TNF-α matured DCs (36.9%). Percentages indicate the yields of the cells generated in day 6 monocyte cultures performed in the presence of granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and IL-4 in the absence of PGE2 (iDC, CD1a+ DCSIGN+CD14-CD80-CD83-) or presence of PGE2 (MDSCs, CD1a-DCSIGN-CD14+CD33+CD34+CD80-CD83-) and after additional 48 h maturation of iDC with TNF-αmDC, (CD1a+ DCSIGN+CD14-CD80+CD83+). Bars present data (mean ± s.d.) from 12 different experiments with different donors. (C) Dose-dependent induction of immunosuppressive factors IL10, IDO1, IL4Rα and COX2 in PGE2-induced MDSCs, generated in the presence or absence of IL-4 (relative mRNA levels normalized for hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 and expressed as fold increase (2-ΔCT), where ΔCT = CT (Target gene) - CT (HPRT1)). Bars present data (mean ± s.d) of a single representative experiment with different donors. *P <0.05, **P <0.01, ***P <0.001, statistically significant differences relative to medium alone.

Prostaglandin E-induced positive cyclooxygenase 2-prostaglandin E-E-prostanoid receptor 2/4 feedback loop allows for generation of high numbers of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and their functional stability. (A) Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) (via E-prostanoid receptor (EP)2- and EP4-dependent signals) drives the early induction of cyclooxygenase (COX)2 in local myeloid cells (monocytes, macrophages, immature dendritic cells (iDCs)), promoting their production of suppressive factors (indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO)1, IL-10, arginase 1, nitric oxide synthase (NOS)2, and PGE2 itself (current data and [48]), and acquisition of suppressive functions [48]. These processes are further amplified by the de novo production of endogenous PGE2, now produced at high levels by myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) themselves, thereby creating a positive feedback loop leading to persistence of MDSCs. The key role of the EP2- and EP4-mediated COX2-PGE2 feedback to control multiple aspects of MDSCs function provides convenient targets to generate MDSC-associated immune regulation in tolerogenic therapies. (B) PGE2 induces high numbers of MDSCs (48.6%), with yields similar to iDCs (40.2%) and TNF-α matured DCs (36.9%). Percentages indicate the yields of the cells generated in day 6 monocyte cultures performed in the presence of granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and IL-4 in the absence of PGE2 (iDC, CD1a+ DCSIGN+CD14-CD80-CD83-) or presence of PGE2 (MDSCs, CD1a-DCSIGN-CD14+CD33+CD34+CD80-CD83-) and after additional 48 h maturation of iDC with TNF-αmDC, (CD1a+ DCSIGN+CD14-CD80+CD83+). Bars present data (mean ± s.d.) from 12 different experiments with different donors. (C) Dose-dependent induction of immunosuppressive factors IL10, IDO1, IL4Rα and COX2 in PGE2-induced MDSCs, generated in the presence or absence of IL-4 (relative mRNA levels normalized for hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 and expressed as fold increase (2-ΔCT), where ΔCT = CT (Target gene) - CT (HPRT1)). Bars present data (mean ± s.d) of a single representative experiment with different donors. *P <0.05, **P <0.01, ***P <0.001, statistically significant differences relative to medium alone. The differentiation of monocytes into functional CD1a+ DCs could be redirected into CD1a-CD14+CD80-CD83- MDSCs by their exposure to PGE2 only at early stages of DC development (that is, from day 0, PGE2d0) [29] but not at later time points (that is, at day 6, PGE2-conditioned DCsd6). While the immunosuppressive phenotype of the PGE2-induced MDSCs proved to be PGE2 concentration-dependent (Figure 1C) [29], it was independent of the presence of IL-4, indicating a key role for PGE2, but not for IL-4, in inducing MDSCs. Exposure to PGE2 induced the expression of endogenous COX2 in differentiating monocytes, leading to the establishment of a PGE2-COX2-mediated positive feedback loop, and the induction of IDO1, NOS2, IL-10, or IL-4Rα - the typical MDSC-associated factors (Figure 1C). PGE2-induced cells displayed a suppressive phenotype, marked by the expression of inhibitory molecules - inhibitory receptor Ig-like transcript (ILT)2, ILT3, ILT4 and programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (previously implicated in the suppressive functions of myeloid cells [27,28]), produced the immunosuppressive factors IDO1, IL10 and PGE2 and exerted suppressive functions, blocking the proliferation and development of CD8+ T cells into granzyme B (GrB)high cytotoxic T lymphocytes [33]. Additionally, PGE2 induced a uniform expression of high levels of CXCR4 [34], typically present on MDSCs from cancer-bearing individuals [56], and strong migratory responsiveness to CXCL12 [34].

Therapeutic potential of ex vivo induced myeloid-derived suppressor cells

Anti-inflammatory activity of MDSCs in a variety of physiological settings and their therapeutic promise in transplantation [57] suggest that these cells may provide a novel cell-based immunotherapy in transplantation [40,58] and autoimmune diseases [59]. While the spontaneously arising endogenous MDSCs present in many forms of autoimmune diseases appear to be defective and ineffective in controlling the disease (reviewed in [60]), it was shown that adoptive transfer of MDSCs can limit autoimmune pathology [61-63], providing a rationale for the development of methods to expand or induce MDSCs ex vivo. Transfer of MDSCs can prevent graft-versus-host disease [42], and prolong the survival of allo-skin [64] and allo-kidney transplants [65], and play an essential role in an allogeneic cardiac transplantation model [57]. Adoptively transferred MDSCs, isolated from synegeic tumor-bearing mice, can prevent the onset of type 1 diabetes in non-obese diabetic mice [63] and ameliorate the symptoms of inflammatory bowel disease [59]. In a mouse model of alopecia, adoptively transferred MDSCs have been shown to promote partial restoration of hair growth [62]. From the therapeutic standpoint, it is important to identify central regulatory pathways that maintain the suppressive functions of MDSCs mediated by different suppressive molecules (arginase 1 [42], ILT-2 [66], heme-oxygenase (HO-1) [64], and iNOS [65]). Our data [48,67] - showing that the exposure of differentiating monocytes to PGE2 (and the establishment of a positive feedback between PGE2 and COX2) is both required and sufficient for MDSC stability and their ability to produce all MDSC-associated suppressive mediators and suppress CD8+ T cell function [48] - provides evidence for a feasible and clinically compatible method of generating suppressive cells for immunotherapeutic purposes.

Conclusions

Due to their ability to suppress T cell responses in multiple diseases [65,68,69], MDSCs represent a promising population of cells for use in tolerogenic therapies. Our recent observations demonstrating the feasibility of using PGE2 to promote the development of MDSCs from monocytic precursors provide a clinically feasible system of generating large numbers of MDSCs ex vivo, facilitating the development of new therapies for autoimmune diseases and transplant rejection.

Abbreviations

COX: Cyclooxygenase; DC: Dendritic cell; EP: E-prostanoid receptor; GM-CSF: Granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor; GrB: Granzyme B; HO-1: Heme-oxygenase; IDO: Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase; IFN: Interferon; IL: Interleukin; ILT: Inhibitory receptor Ig-like transcript; iMC: Immature myeloid cells; iNOS: Inducible nitric oxide synthase; Lin: Lineage; MDSC: Myeloid-derived suppressor cell; NOS: Nitric oxide synthase; PBMC: Peripheral blood mononuclear cell; PGE2: Prostaglandin E2; Th: T helper; Treg: Regulatory T cells.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

NO and PK conceived the work and wrote the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
  68 in total

1.  The importance of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the regulation of autoimmune effector cells by a chronic contact eczema.

Authors:  Rachid Marhaba; Mario Vitacolonna; Dagmar Hildebrand; Michal Baniyash; Pia Freyschmidt-Paul; Margot Zöller
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 2.  Prostaglandin E receptors.

Authors:  Yukihiko Sugimoto; Shuh Narumiya
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Identification of a new subset of myeloid suppressor cells in peripheral blood of melanoma patients with modulation by a granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulation factor-based antitumor vaccine.

Authors:  Paola Filipazzi; Roberta Valenti; Veronica Huber; Lorenzo Pilla; Paola Canese; Manuela Iero; Chiara Castelli; Luigi Mariani; Giorgio Parmiani; Licia Rivoltini
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Prostaglandin E2 promotes tumor progression by inducing myeloid-derived suppressor cells.

Authors:  Pratima Sinha; Virginia K Clements; Amy M Fulton; Suzanne Ostrand-Rosenberg
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Cross-talk between myeloid-derived suppressor cells and macrophages subverts tumor immunity toward a type 2 response.

Authors:  Pratima Sinha; Virginia K Clements; Stephanie K Bunt; Steven M Albelda; Suzanne Ostrand-Rosenberg
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2007-07-15       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Circulating and tumor-infiltrating myeloid cell subsets in patients with bladder cancer.

Authors:  Evgeniy Eruslanov; Molly Neuberger; Irina Daurkin; George Q Perrin; Chester Algood; Philipp Dahm; Charles Rosser; Johannes Vieweg; Scott M Gilbert; Sergei Kusmartsev
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Immunoregulatory properties of rapamycin-conditioned monocyte-derived dendritic cells and their role in transplantation.

Authors:  Camila Macedo; Hēth Turquist; Diana Metes; Angus W Thomson
Journal:  Transplant Res       Date:  2012-09-28

8.  Alternative approaches to myeloid suppressor cell therapy in transplantation: comparing regulatory macrophages to tolerogenic DCs and MDSCs.

Authors:  Paloma Riquelme; Edward K Geissler; James A Hutchinson
Journal:  Transplant Res       Date:  2012-09-28

9.  Human tolerogenic DC-10: perspectives for clinical applications.

Authors:  Giada Amodio; Silvia Gregori
Journal:  Transplant Res       Date:  2012-09-28

10.  MyD88-dependent expansion of an immature GR-1(+)CD11b(+) population induces T cell suppression and Th2 polarization in sepsis.

Authors:  Matthew J Delano; Philip O Scumpia; Jason S Weinstein; Dominique Coco; Srinivas Nagaraj; Kindra M Kelly-Scumpia; Kerri A O'Malley; James L Wynn; Svetlana Antonenko; Samer Z Al-Quran; Ryan Swan; Chun-Shiang Chung; Mark A Atkinson; Reuben Ramphal; Dmitry I Gabrilovich; Wesley H Reeves; Alfred Ayala; Joseph Phillips; Drake Laface; Paul G Heyworth; Michael Clare-Salzler; Lyle L Moldawer
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2007-06-04       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  50 in total

Review 1.  Role of prostanoids in gastrointestinal cancer.

Authors:  Dingzhi Wang; Raymond N DuBois
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 2.  Hampering immune suppressors: therapeutic targeting of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in cancer.

Authors:  Sabrin Husein Albeituni; Chuanlin Ding; Jun Yan
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.360

3.  Soluble CD83 Inhibits T Cell Activation by Binding to the TLR4/MD-2 Complex on CD14+ Monocytes.

Authors:  Joe M Horvatinovich; Elizabeth W Grogan; Marcus Norris; Alexander Steinkasserer; Henrique Lemos; Andrew L Mellor; Irina Y Tcherepanova; Charles A Nicolette; Mark A DeBenedette
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 5.422

4.  Myeloid-derived suppressor cells can be efficiently generated from human hematopoietic progenitors and peripheral blood monocytes.

Authors:  Sílvia Casacuberta-Serra; Marta Parés; Arantxa Golbano; Elisabet Coves; Carmen Espejo; Jordi Barquinero
Journal:  Immunol Cell Biol       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 5.126

Review 5.  [Immunosuppressives to prevent rejection reactions after allogeneic corneal transplantation].

Authors:  T Lapp; P Maier; F Birnbaum; G Schlunck; T Reinhard
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 6.  Highlights on mechanisms of drugs targeting MDSCs: providing a novel perspective on cancer treatment.

Authors:  Wei Pan; Qian Sun; Yang Wang; Jian Wang; Shui Cao; Xiubao Ren
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-04-01

7.  An Overview of Advances in Cell-Based Cancer Immunotherapies Based on the Multiple Immune-Cancer Cell Interactions.

Authors:  Jialing Zhang; Stephan S Späth; Sherman M Weissman; Samuel G Katz
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2020

Review 8.  Recent advances in myeloid-derived suppressor cell biology.

Authors:  Mahmoud Mohammad Yaseen; Nizar Mohammad Abuharfeil; Homa Darmani; Ammar Daoud
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 4.592

9.  Oral Pathobiont Activates Anti-Apoptotic Pathway, Promoting both Immune Suppression and Oncogenic Cell Proliferation.

Authors:  Pachiappan Arjunan; Mohamed M Meghil; Wenhu Pi; Jinxian Xu; Liwei Lang; Ahmed El-Awady; William Sullivan; Mythilypriya Rajendran; Mariana Sousa Rabelo; Tong Wang; Omnia K Tawfik; Govindarajan Kunde-Ramamoorthy; Nagendra Singh; Thangaraju Muthusamy; Cristiano Susin; Yong Teng; Roger M Arce; Christopher W Cutler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Regulatory myeloid cells in transplantation.

Authors:  Brian R Rosborough; Dàlia Raïch-Regué; Heth R Turnquist; Angus W Thomson
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 4.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.