Literature DB >> 23368862

Quality improvement opportunities in gynecologic cytologic-histologic correlations: findings from the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference working group 4.

Barbara A Crothers1, Bruce A Jones, Leigh Ann Cahill, Ann T Moriarty, Dina R Mody, William D Tench, Rhona J Souers.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Cytopathology experts, interested stakeholders, and representatives from the College of American Pathologists, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the American Society of Cytopathology, the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology, the American Society for Clinical Pathology, and the American Society of Cytotechnology convened the Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference to present preliminary consensus statements developed by working groups, including the Cytologic-Histologic Correlations Working Group 4, using results from surveys and literature review. Conference participants voted on statements, suggested changes where consensus was not achieved, and voted on proposed changes.
OBJECTIVES: To document existing practices in gynecologic cytologic-histologic correlation, to develop consensus statements on appropriate practices, to explore standardization, and to suggest improvement in these practices. DATA SOURCES: The material is based on survey results from 546 US laboratories, review of the literature from 1988 to 2011, and the College of American Pathologists Web site for consensus comments and additional survey questions.
CONCLUSIONS: Cytologic-histologic correlations can be performed retrospectively, during initial case review, or both. At minimum, all available slides should be reviewed for a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion Papanicolaou test with negative biopsies. The preferred monitor for correlations is the positive predictive value of a Papanicolaou test. Laboratories should design cytologic-histologic correlation programs to explore existing or perceived quality deficiencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23368862     DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2012-0250-OA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  5 in total

Review 1.  Cervical cancer screening: A never-ending developing program.

Authors:  Ciro Comparetto; Franco Borruto
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 1.337

2.  Current Cytology Practices in Korea: A Nationwide Survey by the Korean Society for Cytopathology.

Authors:  Eun Ji Oh; Chan Kwon Jung; Dong-Hoon Kim; Han Kyeom Kim; Wan Seop Kim; So-Young Jin; Hye Kyoung Yoon
Journal:  J Pathol Transl Med       Date:  2017-09-27

3.  High-resolution anoscopy, is there a benefit in proceeding directly to the operating room?

Authors:  B Moeckli; J Canner; A Najafian; S Carbunaru; N Cowell; C Atallah; E Paredes; A Chudnovets; S H Fang
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Cyto-Histopathological Correlations in Pathology Diagnostics.

Authors:  Ivana Kholová
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-13

5.  Cervical Cytology-Histology Correlation Based on the American Society of Cytopathology Guideline (2017) at the Russian National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology.

Authors:  Aleksandra Asaturova; Darya Dobrovolskaya; Alina Magnaeva; Anna Tregubova; Guldana Bayramova; Gennady Sukhikh
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.