Literature DB >> 23368780

Comparison of Chinese and white Bolton standards at age 13.

Xiao-Guang Zhao1, Mark Guenther Hans, Juan Martin Palomo, Jiu-Xiang Lin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To create a combined male-female Chinese Bolton standard for age 13 and to compare it to the combined Bolton standard for white 13 year olds.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two Chinese and 32 white subjects (16 adolescent boys and 16 adolescent girls aged 13 years in each ethnic group) who fulfilled the selection criteria used to create the original Bolton standards were enrolled. Their cephalograms were traced and then averaged two at a time following the Bolton method. In addition to creating the template from the 32 subjects in each group, 43 linear and angular variables were measured and compared between the two ethnic groups and between the two sexes in each ethnic group using independent t-tests. A P value of .05 was used to assign statistical significance. The male-female combined templates for 13 year olds were also compared superimposing either in the Bolton relation or by soft tissue.
RESULTS: No sexual dimorphism was found in the white subjects, whereas the Chinese girls had decreased upper face height (Na-ANS), more protrusive incisors (SNA-U1), and shorter cranial base (Ba-Na) and posterior cranial base (S-Ba) compared with the Chinese boys. In terms of ethnic comparison, the Chinese subjects presented shorter sagittal facial dimensions, a clockwise rotated mandible with a more acute gonial angle, and a convex facial profile with a less prominent nose and chin. However, overall vertical dimensions were similar.
CONCLUSIONS: A 13-year-old combined male-female Chinese Bolton standard was created that demonstrated visually and with metric comparisons that Chinese and white clinically normal subjects have different craniofacial characteristics. These differences should be taken into consideration when an individualized orthodontic treatment plan is developed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23368780      PMCID: PMC8744519          DOI: 10.2319/110412-849.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  11 in total

1.  Ethnic differences in the soft tissue profiles of Turkish and European-American young adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces.

Authors:  Tancan Uysal; Asli Baysal; Ahmet Yagci; Lauren M Sigler; James A McNamara
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Comparison of craniofacial characteristics of typical Chinese and Caucasian young adults.

Authors:  Yan Gu; James A McNamara; Lauren M Sigler; Tiziano Baccetti
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Variations in facial relationships; their significance in treatment and prognosis.

Authors:  W B DOWNS
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1948-10

4.  The Downs analysis applied to three other ethnic groups.

Authors:  W N COTTON; W S TAKANO; W M W WONG
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1951-10       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  The Frankfort-mandibular plane angle in orthodontic diagnosis, classification, treatment planning, and prognosis.

Authors:  C H TWEED
Journal:  Am J Orthod Oral Surg       Date:  1946-04

6.  Ethnic differences in the soft tissue profile of Korean and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces.

Authors:  Hyeon-Shik Hwang; Wang-Sik Kim; James A McNamara
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  The craniofacial skeletal pattern of the South African Negro.

Authors:  A Jacobson
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1978-06

8.  Craniofacial structure of Japanese and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces.

Authors:  K Miyajima; J A McNamara; T Kimura; S Murata; T Iizuka
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Longitudinal study of relative growth rates of the maxilla and the mandible according to quantitative cervical vertebral maturation.

Authors:  Lili Chen; Jiarong Liu; Tianmin Xu; Jiuxiang Lin
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  A method of cephalometric evaluation.

Authors:  J A McNamara
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1984-12
View more
  1 in total

1.  Preferences of color and lip position for facial attractiveness by laypersons and orthodontists.

Authors:  Qingjuan Shi; Hong Zheng; Rongdang Hu
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 2.711

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.