Literature DB >> 23368109

Entanglement and sources of magnetic anisotropy in radical pair-based avian magnetoreceptors.

Hannah J Hogben1, Till Biskup, P J Hore.   

Abstract

One of the principal models of magnetic sensing in migratory birds rests on the quantum spin dynamics of transient radical pairs created photochemically in ocular cryptochrome proteins. We consider here the role of electron spin entanglement and coherence in determining the sensitivity of a radical pair-based geomagnetic compass and the origins of the directional response. It emerges that the anisotropy of radical pairs formed from spin-polarized molecular triplets could form the basis of a more sensitive compass sensor than one founded on the conventional hyperfine-anisotropy model. This property offers new and more flexible opportunities for the design of biologically inspired magnetic compass sensors.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23368109     DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.220501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev Lett        ISSN: 0031-9007            Impact factor:   9.161


  14 in total

1.  Avian magnetic compass can be tuned to anomalously low magnetic intensities.

Authors:  Michael Winklhofer; Evelyn Dylda; Peter Thalau; Wolfgang Wiltschko; Roswitha Wiltschko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Posner qubits: spin dynamics of entangled Ca9(PO4)6 molecules and their role in neural processing.

Authors:  Thomas C Player; P J Hore
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  The quantum needle of the avian magnetic compass.

Authors:  Hamish G Hiscock; Susannah Worster; Daniel R Kattnig; Charlotte Steers; Ye Jin; David E Manolopoulos; Henrik Mouritsen; P J Hore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Sensing magnetic directions in birds: radical pair processes involving cryptochrome.

Authors:  Roswitha Wiltschko; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-07-24

5.  Dark state population determines magnetic sensitivity in radical pair magnetoreception model.

Authors:  Bao-Ming Xu; Jian Zou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Magnetoreception in laboratory mice: sensitivity to extremely low-frequency fields exceeds 33 nT at 30 Hz.

Authors:  Frank S Prato; Dawn Desjardins-Holmes; Lynn D Keenliside; Janice M DeMoor; John A Robertson; Alex W Thomas
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Magnetoreception: activated cryptochrome 1a concurs with magnetic orientation in birds.

Authors:  Christine Nießner; Susanne Denzau; Katrin Stapput; Margaret Ahmad; Leo Peichl; Wolfgang Wiltschko; Roswitha Wiltschko
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Approaches to measuring entanglement in chemical magnetometers.

Authors:  M Tiersch; G G Guerreschi; J Clausen; H J Briegel
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 2.781

9.  The sensitivity of a radical pair compass magnetoreceptor can be significantly amplified by radical scavengers.

Authors:  Daniel R Kattnig; P J Hore
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Quantifying Magnetic Sensitivity of Radical Pair Based Compass by Quantum Fisher Information.

Authors:  Li-Sha Guo; Bao-Ming Xu; Jian Zou; Bin Shao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.