Literature DB >> 23367650

A cross-sectional study on the relationship between utilization of root cause analysis and patient safety at 139 Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers.

Katherine B Percarpio1, B Vince Watts.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Empirical evidence is limited that root cause analysis (RCA), an event analysis tool used in health care to evaluate the systemic factors that lead to adverse events, improves patient safety. A cross-sectional study was conducted to examine the relationship between RCA and patient safety.
METHODS: RCA data were collected for the 139 Department of Veteran Affairs medical centers (VAMCs) in the National Center for Patient Safety database from 2004 through 2006. Participants were divided into three RCA utilization categories on the basis of their yearly RCA rate: (1) fewer than 4 RCAs, (2) 4 to 5 RCAs, and (3) 6 or more RCAs per year. An analysis of variance was conducted of each Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) across the three RCA utilization categories.
RESULTS: Facilities completed between 3 and 59 RCAs in the three-year period (mean RCA utilization rate, 4.86 RCAs per year). In this period, RCA actions by facility ranged from 9 to 323 (mean, 28 actions per year per facility). Mean patient-days of care, facility budget, surgical volume, and the number of strong improvement actions were significantly different across RCA utilization categories. The mean rates of PSI 9 (Postoperative Hemorrhage or Hematoma), PSI 10 (Postoperative Physiologic and Metabolic Derangements), and PSI 13 (Postoperative Sepsis) were significantly different across RCA utilization categories.
CONCLUSIONS: Large, high-spending VAMCs conduct more RCAs per year than smaller, low-spending facilities. VAMCs that do more RCAs develop more corrective actions. VAMCs that complete fewer than four RCAs per year have higher rates of postoperative complications. It is unclear if RCAs are associated with a functional patient safety program or directly improve patient safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23367650     DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(13)39006-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf        ISSN: 1553-7250


  4 in total

Review 1.  How Effective Are Incident-Reporting Systems for Improving Patient Safety? A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Charitini Stavropoulou; Carole Doherty; Paul Tosey
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Effectiveness of systems changes suggested by simulation of adverse surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Meghan E Garstka; Douglas P Slakey; Christopher A Martin; Eric R Simms; James R Korndorffer
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2015-12-01

3.  How Much of Root Cause Analysis Translates into Improved Patient Safety: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jimmy Martin-Delgado; Alba Martínez-García; Jesús María Aranaz; José L Valencia-Martín; José Joaquín Mira
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 1.927

4.  Experience feedback committees: A way of implementing a root cause analysis practice in hospital medical departments.

Authors:  Patrice François; André Lecoanet; Alban Caporossi; Anne-Marie Dols; Arnaud Seigneurin; Bastien Boussat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.