| Literature DB >> 23365565 |
Muhammad Bilal Azmi1, Shamim A Qureshi.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to evaluate the phytochemistry and the effect of methanolic root extract (MREt) of Rauwolfia serpentina on alloxan-induced diabetic Wister male mice. Mice were divided in control (distilled water at 1 mL/kg) and alloxan-induced diabetic mice which subdivided into diabetic (distilled water at 1 mL/kg), negative (0.05% dimethyl sulfoxide at 1 mL/kg), positive (glibenclamide at 5 mg/kg) controls, and three test groups (MREt at 10, 30, and 60 mg/kg). All treatments were given orally for 14 days. Qualitatively MREt showed the presence of alkaloids, carbohydrates, flavonoids, glycosides, cardiac glycosides, phlobatannins, resins, saponins, steroids, tannins, and triterpenoids, while quantitatively extract was rich in total phenols. The flavonoids, saponins and alkaloids were also determined in root powder. MREt found effective in improving the body weights, glucose and insulin levels, insulin/glucose ratio, glycosylated and total hemoglobin in test groups as compared to diabetic control. Similarly, significantly decreased levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein (LDL-c), and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL-c) cholesterols were found in test groups. Significant lipolysis with improved glycogenesis was also found in liver tissues of all test groups. ALT levels were found normal in all groups. Thus, MREt improves the glycemic, antiatherogenic, coronary risk, and cardioprotective indices in alloxan-induced diabetic mice.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23365565 PMCID: PMC3535824 DOI: 10.1155/2012/376429
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Pharmacol Sci ISSN: 1687-6334
Phytochemical analysis of MREt of R. serpentina.
| Phytoconstituent | Qualitative analysis | Quantitative analysis |
|---|---|---|
| (mg/gm) | ||
| Alkaloids | Positive | 7* |
| Anthraquinones | Negative | — |
| Carbohydrates | Positive | — |
| Flavonoids | Positive | 97* |
| Glycosides | Positive | — |
| Cardiac glycosides | Positive | — |
| Phlobatannins | Positive | — |
| Resins | Positive | — |
| Saponins | Positive | 20* |
| Steroids | Positive | — |
| Tanins | Positive | — |
| Triterpenoids | Positive | — |
| Total phenols | Positive | 233 |
*mg/gm of root powder.
Effect of MREt of R. serpentina on body weights of mice.
| Groups | Treatments | Body weight (gm) | Weight change (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial weight | Final weight at 14 day | |||
| Group I | Distilled water (1 mL/ kg) | 28.25 ± 0.85 | 31.25 ± 0.85 | +10.68 ± 1.49 |
| Group II | Alloxan treated (150 mg/kg) | 29.25 ± 1.6 | 26 ± 1.41 | −11.08 ± 1.48 |
| Group III | 0.05% DMSO (1 mL/kg) | 29.5 ± 0.87 | 26.75 ± 0.63 | −9.25 ± 0.62 |
| Group IV | Glibenclamide (5 mg/kg) | 29.5 ± 0.5 | 32 ± 0.71 | +8.45 ± 0.89∗∗∗∗a,b |
| Group V | MREt (10 mg/kg) | 30.75 ± 1.31 | 29 ± 1.22 | −5.69 ± 0.78∗a |
| Group VI | MREt (30 mg/kg) | 28.50 ± 1.55 | 26.75 ± 1.65 | −6.25 ± 1.05∗a |
| Group VII | MREt (60 mg/kg) | 27.50 ± 1.5 | 26.75 ± 1.89 | −2.94 ± 2.37∗∗∗∗a,∗∗b |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ****P < 0.0001, when compared with respective group II (a) and III (b). Negative (−)/positive (+) signs represent loss/gain in weights of mice at 14th day.
Effect of MREt of R. serpentina on fasting blood glucose level in mice.
| Groups | Treatments | Initial day ( | Final day ( | Glycemic change (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I | Distilled water (1 mL/ kg) | 102.25 ± 2.72 | 98 ± 5.84 | −4.16 |
| Group II | Alloxan treated (150 mg/kg) | 198.25 ± 4.91 | 245.50 ± 20.66 | 23.83 |
| Group III | 0.05% DMSO (1 mL/kg) | 199.50 ± 5.62 | 257.25 ± 22.68 | 28.95 |
| Group IV | Glibenclamide (5 mg/kg) | 195.25 ± 3.12 | 116.50 ± 14.46**** | −40.46 |
| Group V | MREt (10 mg/kg) | 198.25 ± 5.01 | 96.25 ± 4.94**** | −51.45 |
| Group VI | MREt (30 mg/kg) | 197.50 ± 6.2 | 105 ± 12.39**** | −46.84 |
| Group VII | MREt (60 mg/kg) | 195.2 ± 5.66 | 98 ± 6.54**** | −49.80 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). ****P < 0.0001, when compared with group II and III at respective day.
Negative (−)/positive (+) signs represent decrease/increase in percent glycemic change at 14th day.
Figure 1Effect of MREt on hemoglobin (g/dL) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM (n = 6). ****P < 0.0001, when compared with group II and III.
Effect of MREt on lipid profile, alanine transaminase (ALT), and antiatherogenic index in mice.
| Parameters | Group I | Group II | Group III | Group IV | Group V | Group VI | Group VII |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 141.65 ± 13.05 | 260.42 ± 10.18 | 254.11 ± 14.94 | 178.40 ± 15.95∗∗∗∗a,∗∗∗b | 146.19 ± 10.01∗∗∗∗a,b | 129.33 ± 19.34∗∗∗∗a,b | 138.50 ± 9.29∗∗∗∗a,b |
| TG (mg/dL) | 148.86 ± 2.08 | 161.33 ± 3.83 | 173.50 ± 19.05 | 121.15 ± 3.38∗a,∗∗b | 128.27 ± 6.59∗a,∗∗b | 149.12 ± 15.46 | 138.75 ± 10.66∗b |
| HDL-c (mg/dL) | 53.08 ± 8.47 | 50.69 ± 7.93 | 45.63 ± 10.01 | 31.20 ± 3.59 | 36.72 ± 5.39 | 36.07 ± 7.06 | 37.45 ± 4.03 |
| LDL-c (mg/dL) | 66.56 ± 9.61 | 175.09 ± 15.76 | 164.64 ± 19.70 | 122.98 ± 18.34∗a | 83.83 ± 7.09∗∗a,b | 63.46 ± 23.68∗∗∗∗a,b | 73.30 ± 8.96∗∗∗∗a,∗∗∗b |
| VLDL-c (mg/dL) | 29.77 ± 0.41 | 32.27 ± 0.77 | 34.70 ± 3.81 | 24.23 ± 0.68∗a,∗∗b | 25.65 ± 1.32∗a,∗∗b | 29.82 ± 3.09 | 27.75 ± 2.13∗b |
| AAI (%) | 37.31 ± 6.43 | 24.98 ± 4.62 | 23.67 ± 6.68 | 23.56 ± 6.39 | 33.34 ± 3.83 | 53.29 ± 24.04 | 37.54 ± 4.59 |
| ALT (U/L) | 15.63 ± 0.38 | 16.93 ± 0.35 | 16.26 ± 0.19 | 9.82 ± 0.11∗∗∗∗a,b | 7.68 ± 0.4∗∗∗∗a,b | 6.75 ± 0.21∗∗∗∗a,b | 7.25 ± 0.23∗∗∗∗a,b |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001, when compared with respective group II (a) and III (b).
Figure 2Effect of MREt on cardioprotective indices. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM (n = 6). *P < 0.05, when compared with group II and III.
Figure 3Effect of MREt on hepatic glycogen and total lipids (g/g). Each bar represents the mean ± SEM (n = 6). *P < 0.05 and ****P < 0.0001, when compared with group II (a) and (b) III.
Figure 4Effect of MREt on serum insulin level and insulin/glucose ratio. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM (n = 6). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ****P < 0.0001, when compared with group II (a) and III (b).