Literature DB >> 23365475

A comparison of interposition and femoropopliteal bypass grafts in the management of popliteal artery trauma.

Mohammad Ali Mohammadzade1, Maryam Mohammadzade, Mohammad Rasul Herfatkar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peripheral vascular injury associated with lower limb trauma is a well-known emergency. The experience for the management of popliteal artery trauma have mainly come from managing the traumas of military personnels during Iran-Iraq war. The present study compared the effects of two currently-used surgical techniques in the management of popliteal trauma, namley femoropopliteal bypass graft and interposition vein graft on limb salvage.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 40 patients with popliteal artery trauma admitted to the trauma unit of a university teaching hospital during 2003 to 2008. The patients had undergone femoropopliteal bypass graft (n=26) or interposition vein graft (n=14) for the management of popliteal trauma.
RESULTS: The amputation rate among patients managed by femoropopliteal bypass or interposition vein graft was 35.7% and 61.5%, respectively. Knee stability among patients managed by interposition graft group was 57.7% and in those managed by femoropopliteal bypass graft was 85.7%.
CONCLUSION: The rates of knee stability achieved by the employed techniques indicate that femoropopliteal bypass vein graft is superior, and therefore, preferable to the interposition vein graft in the management of popliteal artery trauma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Vascular surgery; interposition graft; vascular trauma

Year:  2011        PMID: 23365475      PMCID: PMC3559114     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Med Sci        ISSN: 0253-0716


  11 in total

1.  Complications of operative treatment of injuries of peripheral arteries.

Authors:  M M Velinovic; B L Davidovic; I S Lotina; R M Vranes; L P Djukic; J V Arsov; V M Ristic; J M Kocica; L P Petrovic
Journal:  Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-06

2.  Blunt popliteal artery trauma: one hundred consecutive injuries.

Authors:  W H Wagner; E R Calkins; F A Weaver; J A Goodwin; R A Myles; A E Yellin
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Long-term results of lower-extremity venous injuries.

Authors:  K M Bermudez; M M Knudson; N A Nelken; S Shackleford; C L Dean
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1997-09

4.  Popliteal artery injuries in Vietnam.

Authors:  N M Rich; J H Baugh; C W Hughes
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Popliteal artery injury: Royal Perth experience and literature review.

Authors:  Mazri M Yahya; Bibombe P Mwipatayi; Manzoor Abbas; Suhakar Rao; Kishore Sieunarine
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.872

6.  Gunshot injuries of the popliteal artery.

Authors:  R Nair; A T Abdool-Carrim; J V Robbs
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Vascular injuries in compound fractures of the leg with initially adequate circulation.

Authors:  S Waikakul; S Sakkarnkosol; V Vanadurongwan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-03

8.  Injury to the popliteal vessels: the Lebanese war experience.

Authors:  R E Sfeir; G S Khoury; F F Haddad; R R Fakih; M J Khalifeh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Infrapopliteal arterial injury: prompt revascularization affords optimal limb salvage.

Authors:  F T Padberg; J J Rubelowsky; J J Hernandez-Maldonado; V Milazzo; K G Swan; B C Lee; R W Hobson
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  Popliteal artery trauma: update and recent advances in management.

Authors:  D A Gnanadev; B L Fandrich
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 1.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.