Literature DB >> 23365338

Evaluation of different protections of butyric acid aiming for release in the last part of the gastrointestinal tract of piglets.

J J Mallo1, A Balfagón, M I Gracia, P Honrubia, M Puyalto.   

Abstract

Three tests, 2 in vivo and 1 in vitro, were conducted to compare how 2 forms of protection of butyric acid (BA) affect its liberation along the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of piglets. The 2 forms of BA were vegetable fat-encapsulated sodium butyrate (SBE) and monoglyceride of butyric acid (MB). In the first trial, 528 piglets were weaned at 21 d of age and assigned to 3 diets in 8 replicate pens of 22 piglets per pen for 39 d. The 3 diets were (i) prestarter and starters I and II (Con), (ii) C + SBE (6 kg/t in both prestarter and starter feeds), and (iii) C + MB (2.5 kg/t in the prestarter feed, 2 kg/t in the starter feed I, and 0 kg/t in the starter feed II). Piglets receiving C and SBE feeds tended to show higher BW (18.74, 18.66, and 17.82 kg; P < 0.1) and ADG (331.2, 330.5, and 308.9 g/d; P < 0.1) than MB piglets; no significant differences were observed in feed intake or FCR. In the second trial, 8 pens of 4 piglets each (4 pens per treatment), weaned at 21 d, were given either a standard postweaning program with SBE (2 kg/t) or with MB (2 kg/t) and received the same amount of BA. Body weight, feed intake, and FCR were evaluated at days 14 and 28 of trial. At the end of the trial, 1 animal per pen was euthanized and the concentration of BA and VFA in duodenum, jejunum, ileum, colon, and cecum were quantified with HPLC. There were no statistical differences in growth, feed intake, or FCR. However, SBE-fed animals had higher concentration of VFA in colon than MB-fed animals. There were relevant numerical differences in the rest of the GIT sections but they were not statistically significant. The in vitro digestion of the products confirmed that BA can be released more easily from SBE (157.2 g of BA/kg of product after 7 h) than from MB (56.4 g of BA/kg of product after 7 h). It is concluded that the addition of SBE allows more BA to reach the distal sections of the GIT than MB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23365338     DOI: 10.2527/jas.53959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  8 in total

Review 1.  Nutritional Intervention for the Intestinal Development and Health of Weaned Pigs.

Authors:  Xia Xiong; Bie Tan; Minho Song; Peng Ji; Kwangwook Kim; Yulong Yin; Yanhong Liu
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-02-21

2.  In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities of Organic Acids and Their Derivatives on Several Species of Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacteria.

Authors:  Lauren Kovanda; Wen Zhang; Xiaohong Wei; Jia Luo; Xixi Wu; Edward Robert Atwill; Stefan Vaessen; Xunde Li; Yanhong Liu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  Alterations in Intestinal Antioxidant and Immune Function and Cecal Microbiota of Laying Hens Fed on Coated Sodium Butyrate Supplemented Diets.

Authors:  Sasa Miao; Zuopeng Hong; Huafeng Jian; Qianqian Xu; Yating Liu; Xiaoming Wang; Yan Li; Xinyang Dong; Xiaoting Zou
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  In vitro evaluation of sodium butyrate on the growth of three Salmonella serovars derived from pigs at a mild acidic pH value.

Authors:  Isabell Hollmann; Jan Berend Lingens; Bussarakam Chuppava; Volker Wilke; Amr Abd El-Wahab; Juhle Buch; Julia Hankel; Marwa F E Ahmed; Christian Visscher
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-07-26

5.  Effects of Tributyrin on Intestinal Energy Status, Antioxidative Capacity and Immune Response to Lipopolysaccharide Challenge in Broilers.

Authors:  Jiaolong Li; Yongqing Hou; Dan Yi; Jun Zhang; Lei Wang; Hongyi Qiu; Binying Ding; Joshua Gong
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.509

Review 6.  Non-antibiotic feed additives in diets for pigs: A review.

Authors:  Yanhong Liu; Charmaine D Espinosa; Jerubella J Abelilla; Gloria A Casas; L Vanessa Lagos; Su A Lee; Woong B Kwon; John K Mathai; Diego M D L Navarro; Neil W Jaworski; Hans H Stein
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2018-02-08

Review 7.  Implications of butyrate and its derivatives for gut health and animal production.

Authors:  Andrea Bedford; Joshua Gong
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2017-09-13

8.  A Pilot Study on The Effect of a Novel Feed Additive Containing Exogenous Enzymes, Acidifiers, Sodium Butyrate and Silicon Dioxide Nanoparticles on Selected Cellular Immune Indices and Body Weight Gains of Calves.

Authors:  Ewelina Szacawa; Katarzyna Dudek; Dariusz Bednarek; Marek Pieszka; Dorota Bederska-Łojewska
Journal:  J Vet Res       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 1.744

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.