Literature DB >> 23365191

Comparison of in vitro human endothelial cell response to self-expanding stent deployment in a straight and curved peripheral artery simulator.

Ríona Ní Ghriallais1, Laoise McNamara, Mark Bruzzi.   

Abstract

Haemodynamic forces have a synergistic effect on endothelial cell (EC) morphology, proliferation, differentiation and biochemical expression profiles. Alterations to haemodynamic force levels have been observed at curved regions and bifurcations of arteries but also around struts of stented arteries, and are also known to be associated with various vascular pathologies. Therefore, curvature in combination with stenting might create a pro-atherosclerotic environment compared with stenting in a straight vessel, but this has never been investigated. The goal of this study was to compare EC morphology, proliferation and differentiation within in vitro models of curved stented peripheral vessel models with those of straight and unstented vessels. These models were generated using both static conditions and also subjected to 24 h of stimulation in a peripheral artery bioreactor. Medical-grade silicone tubes were seeded with human umbilical vein endothelial cells to produce pseudovessels that were then stented and subjected to 24 h of physiological levels of pulsatile pressure, radial distention and shear stress. Changes in cell number, orientation and nitric oxide (NO) production were assessed in straight, curved, non-stented and stented pseudovessels. We report that curved pseudovessels lead to higher EC numbers with random orientation and lower NO production per cell compared with straight pseudovessels after 24 h of biomechanical stimulation. Both stented curved and stented straight pseudovessels had lower NO production per cell than corresponding unstented pseudovessels. However, in contrast to straight stented pseudovessels, curved stented pseudovessels had fewer viable cells. The results of this study show, for the first time, that the response of the vascular endothelium is dependent on both curvature and stenting combined, and highlight the necessity for future investigations of the effects of curvature in combination with stenting to fully understand effects on the endothelial layer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23365191      PMCID: PMC3627103          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2012.0965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  74 in total

1.  Shear stress, vascular remodeling and neointimal formation.

Authors:  Jolanda J Wentzel; Frank J H Gijsen; Nikos Stergiopulos; Patrick W Serruys; Cornelis J Slager; Rob Krams
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis.

Authors:  A M Malek; S L Alper; S Izumo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Biomechanical incompatibility of popliteal stent placement.

Authors:  Knut Kröger; Frans Santosa; Mathias Goyen
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.487

4.  Combined effects of pulsatile flow and dynamic curvature on wall shear stress in a coronary artery bifurcation model.

Authors:  I V Pivkin; P D Richardson; D H Laidlaw; G E Karniadakis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  The effect of physiological cyclic stretch on the cell morphology, cell orientation and protein expression of endothelial cells.

Authors:  Valerie Barron; Claire Brougham; Karen Coghlan; Emily McLucas; Denis O'Mahoney; Catherine Stenson-Cox; Peter E McHugh
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Endothelial cell response to biomechanical forces under simulated vascular loading conditions.

Authors:  M A Punchard; C Stenson-Cox; E D O'cearbhaill; E Lyons; S Gundy; L Murphy; A Pandit; P E McHugh; V Barron
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 7.  Normal and pathological aspects of mass transport across the vascular wall.

Authors:  J H Kennedy; A Tedgui
Journal:  Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1995-12

8.  Cell orientation response to cyclically deformed substrates: experimental validation of a cell model.

Authors:  H Wang; W Ip; R Boissy; E S Grood
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Multi-axial mechanical stimulation of HUVECs demonstrates that combined loading is not equivalent to the superposition of individual wall shear stress and tensile hoop stress components.

Authors:  Liam T Breen; Peter E McHugh; Bruce P Murphy
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.097

10.  Effects of disturbed flow on endothelial cells.

Authors:  J J Chiu; D L Wang; S Chien; R Skalak; S Usami
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.097

View more
  4 in total

1.  Angiogenesis effect of therapeutic ultrasound on ischemic hind limb in mice.

Authors:  Jing-Juan Huang; Yi-Qin Shi; Rui-Lin Li; An Hu; Hong-Sheng Zhou; Qian Cheng; Zheng Xu; Zhi-Ming Yang; Chang-Ning Hao; Jun-Li Duan
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  Design and Verification of a Novel Perfusion Bioreactor to Evaluate the Performance of a Self-Expanding Stent for Peripheral Artery Applications.

Authors:  Swati Nandan; Jessica Schiavi-Tritz; Rudolf Hellmuth; Craig Dunlop; Ted J Vaughan; Eimear B Dolan
Journal:  Front Med Technol       Date:  2022-06-21

3.  Visualizing polymeric bioresorbable scaffolds with three-dimensional image reconstruction using contrast-enhanced micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  Sheng Tu; Fudong Hu; Wei Cai; Liyan Xiao; Linlin Zhang; Hong Zheng; Qiong Jiang; Lianglong Chen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Increased MMP activity in curved geometries disrupts the endothelial cell glycocalyx creating a proinflammatory environment.

Authors:  Scott Cooper; Alexander Emmott; Karli K McDonald; Marc-Antoine Campeau; Richard L Leask
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.