Literature DB >> 23365066

Randomized controlled trial of trigeminal nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy.

Christopher M DeGiorgio1, Jason Soss, Ian A Cook, Daniela Markovic, Jeffrey Gornbein, Diana Murray, Sandra Oviedo, Steven Gordon, Guadalupe Corralle-Leyva, Colin P Kealey, Christi N Heck.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the safety and efficacy of external trigeminal nerve stimulation (eTNS) in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) using a double-blind randomized controlled trial design, and to test the suitability of treatment and control parameters in preparation for a phase III multicenter clinical trial.
METHODS: This is a double-blind randomized active-control trial in DRE. Fifty subjects with 2 or more partial onset seizures per month (complex partial or tonic-clonic) entered a 6-week baseline period, and then were evaluated at 6, 12, and 18 weeks during the acute treatment period. Subjects were randomized to treatment (eTNS 120 Hz) or control (eTNS 2 Hz) parameters.
RESULTS: At entry, subjects were highly drug-resistant, averaging 8.7 seizures per month (treatment group) and 4.8 seizures per month (active controls). On average, subjects failed 3.35 antiepileptic drugs prior to enrollment, with an average duration of epilepsy of 21.5 years (treatment group) and 23.7 years (active control group), respectively. eTNS was well-tolerated. Side effects included anxiety (4%), headache (4%), and skin irritation (14%). The responder rate, defined as >50% reduction in seizure frequency, was 30.2% for the treatment group vs 21.1% for the active control group for the 18-week treatment period (not significant, p = 0.31, generalized estimating equation [GEE] model). The treatment group experienced a significant within-group improvement in responder rate over the 18-week treatment period (from 17.8% at 6 weeks to 40.5% at 18 weeks, p = 0.01, GEE). Subjects in the treatment group were more likely to respond than patients randomized to control (odds ratio 1.73, confidence interval 0.59-0.51). eTNS was associated with reductions in seizure frequency as measured by the response ratio (p = 0.04, analysis of variance [ANOVA]), and improvements in mood on the Beck Depression Inventory (p = 0.02, ANOVA).
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides preliminary evidence that eTNS is safe and may be effective in subjects with DRE. Side effects were primarily limited to anxiety, headache, and skin irritation. These results will serve as a basis to inform and power a larger multicenter phase III clinical trial. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This phase II study provides Class II evidence that trigeminal nerve stimulation may be safe and effective in reducing seizures in people with DRE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23365066      PMCID: PMC3598453          DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318285c11a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  20 in total

1.  Neuronal connections of the paratrigeminal nucleus: a topographic analysis of neurons projecting to bulbar, pontine and thalamic nuclei related to cardiovascular, respiratory and sensory functions.

Authors:  C A Caous; H de Sousa Buck; C J Lindsey
Journal:  Auton Neurosci       Date:  2001-12-10       Impact factor: 3.145

2.  Mood disorders are linked to health-related quality of life in epilepsy.

Authors:  Joyce A. Cramer
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.937

Review 3.  Clinical practice. Initial management of epilepsy.

Authors:  Jacqueline A French; Timothy A Pedley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Trigeminal nerve stimulation for epilepsy: long-term feasibility and efficacy.

Authors:  Christopher M DeGiorgio; Diana Murray; Daniela Markovic; Todd Whitehurst
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Prospective long-term study of vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of refractory seizures.

Authors:  C M DeGiorgio; S C Schachter; A Handforth; M Salinsky; J Thompson; B Uthman; R Reed; S Collins; E Tecoma; G L Morris; B Vaughn; D K Naritoku; T Henry; D Labar; R Gilmartin; D Labiner; I Osorio; R Ristanovic; J Jones; J Murphy; G Ney; J Wheless; P Lewis; C Heck
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.864

6.  Effects of L-threo-DOPS, an L-noradrenaline precursor, on locus coeruleus-originating neurons in spinal trigeminal nucleus.

Authors:  M Sasa; Y Ohno; H Nabatame; N Yoshimura; S Takaori
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1987-09-08       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Reduction of pentylenetetrazole-induced seizure activity in awake rats by seizure-triggered trigeminal nerve stimulation.

Authors:  E E Fanselow; A P Reid; M A Nicolelis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Trigeminal nerve stimulation in major depressive disorder: first proof of concept in an open pilot trial.

Authors:  Lara M Schrader; Ian A Cook; Patrick R Miller; Eve R Maremont; Christopher M DeGiorgio
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.937

9.  Seizure control and mortality in epilepsy.

Authors:  M R Sperling; H Feldman; J Kinman; J D Liporace; M J O'Connor
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  Antikindling effects of locus coeruleus stimulation: mediation by ascending noradrenergic projections.

Authors:  G K Weiss; J Lewis; C Jimenez-Rivera; A Vigil; M E Corcoran
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 5.330

View more
  39 in total

1.  Transcutaneous trigeminal nerve stimulation induces a long-term depression-like plasticity of the human blink reflex.

Authors:  Giovanna Pilurzi; Beniamina Mercante; Francesca Ginatempo; Paolo Follesa; Eusebio Tolu; Franca Deriu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Epilepsy: A Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Joseph I Sirven
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 6.915

3.  Trigeminal nerve stimulation modulates brainstem more than cortical excitability in healthy humans.

Authors:  B Mercante; G Pilurzi; F Ginatempo; A Manca; P Follesa; E Tolu; F Deriu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Neurostimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy.

Authors:  Christopher M DeGiorgio; Scott E Krahl
Journal:  Continuum (Minneap Minn)       Date:  2013-06

5.  Trigeminal nerve stimulation may not be effective for the treatment of refractory partial seizures.

Authors:  Alison M Pack
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 7.500

6.  Neurodevice startups target peripheral nervous system.

Authors:  Michael Eisenstein
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Effects of acute trigeminal nerve stimulation on rest EEG activity in healthy adults.

Authors:  Francesca Ginatempo; Fabrizio De Carli; Sara Todesco; Beniamina Mercante; Gian Pietro Sechi; Franca Deriu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled, Pilot Study of Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Authors:  James J McGough; Alexandra Sturm; Jennifer Cowen; Kelly Tung; Giulia C Salgari; Andrew F Leuchter; Ian A Cook; Catherine A Sugar; Sandra K Loo
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 8.829

Review 9.  Electrical stimulation of cranial nerves in cognition and disease.

Authors:  Devin Adair; Dennis Truong; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Nigel Gebodh; Helen Borges; Libby Ho; J Douglas Bremner; Bashar W Badran; Vitaly Napadow; Vincent P Clark; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-02-23       Impact factor: 8.955

10.  Chronic Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation Protects Against Seizures, Cognitive Impairments, Hippocampal Apoptosis, and Inflammatory Responses in Epileptic Rats.

Authors:  Qian-Qian Wang; Li-Jun Zhu; Xian-Hong Wang; Jian Zuo; Hui-Yan He; Miao-Miao Tian; Lei Wang; Gui-Ling Liang; Yu Wang
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.