Literature DB >> 23364754

Survey of laboratory tests used in the diagnosis and evaluation of haemophilia A.

Keith Gomez1, Meera Chitlur.   

Abstract

Although the incidence of haemophilia A is reportedly uniform across ethnic groups, the prevalence varies in different countries. This suggests variability in the effectiveness of diagnostic strategies which is of particular importance in the recognition of milder forms of the disease. To assess the different laboratory tests that are used in the diagnosis and subsequent management of haemophilia A we carried out a web-based survey of established haemophilia centres. This was sent to 13 haemophilia physicians from haemophilia-treatment centres in Germany, Italy, Spain, South Africa, Taiwan, Norway, Canada, UK and the USA. The survey asked for details of clotting tests, the use of genetic analysis and the use of global haemostatic assays in haemophilia A cases. The results show considerable variation in the laboratory methods used for the screening, diagnosis and monitoring of haemophilia A. There is variability in the techniques used even for long-standing, standardised assays such as the one-stage factor assay. There is marked regional variability in the use of molecular diagnosis. Assessment of haemophilia A requires accurate and sensitive assays. Some laboratories continue to rely on a single-factor assay in the diagnosis of non-severe disease, although cases with assay discrepancy may be missed by this strategy. Global assays are becoming important in the evaluation and management of patients. However, standardisation and the correlation with clinical outcomes require further study. Genetic diagnosis in patients with haemophilia remains underutilised in USA, possibly because of a lack of funding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23364754     DOI: 10.1160/TH12-02-0108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  3 in total

1.  Analysis of nationwide hemophilia care: A cohort study using two Japanese healthcare claims databases.

Authors:  Ei Kinai; Midori Ono; Akinori Oh; Mihoko Ota; Yasuo Myaguchi; Hitoshi Ueda
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-27

2.  Educational needs of hematologists and laboratory professionals regarding factor activity assays.

Authors:  Dorothy M Adcock; Mazi Rasulnia; Natalia Holot; David L Cooper
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2018-04-13

3.  Novel F8 and F9 gene variants from the PedNet hemophilia registry classified according to ACMG/AMP guidelines.

Authors:  Nadine G Andersson; Veerle Labarque; Anna Letelier; Maria Elisa Mancuso; Martina Bührlen; Kathelijn Fischer; Mutlu Kartal-Kaess; Minna Koskenvuo; Torben Mikkelsen; Rolf Ljung
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 4.878

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.