Literature DB >> 23364748

Does consumption rate scale superlinearly?

Henrique C Giacomini1, Brian J Shuter, Derrick T de Kerckhove, Peter A Abrams.   

Abstract

Arising from S. Pawar, A. I. Dell & V. M. Savage 486, 485-489 10.1038/nature11131(2012)A recent paper by Pawar and colleagues has provided important insights into the consequences of foraging behaviour for food-web dynamics. One notable pattern predicted by their analysis is that consumption rate (c) scales superlinearly (cm(1.16)) with consumer body mass (m) in three-dimensional (3D), but not two-dimensional (2D), foraging spaces. Although we feel that the authors should be applauded for this interesting contribution, we argue that their result is not consistent with established life-history theory. To resolve this contradiction, progress in both fields is probably required, including new empirical studies in which consumption rate, metabolism and dimensionality are examined directly under natural conditions.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23364748     DOI: 10.1038/nature11829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  8 in total

1.  A general model for ontogenetic growth.

Authors:  G B West; J H Brown; B J Enquist
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-10-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Reproductive constraints and the evolution of life histories with indeterminate growth.

Authors:  E L Charnov; T F Turner; K O Winemiller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-31       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Quantitative laws in metabolism and growth.

Authors:  L VON BERTALANFFY
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1957-09       Impact factor: 4.875

4.  Dimensionality of consumer search space drives trophic interaction strengths.

Authors:  Samraat Pawar; Anthony I Dell; Van M Savage
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Beyond the '3/4-power law': variation in the intra- and interspecific scaling of metabolic rate in animals.

Authors:  Douglas S Glazier
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2005-11

6.  Body size in ecological networks.

Authors:  Guy Woodward; Bo Ebenman; Mark Emmerson; Jose M Montoya; Jens M Olesen; Alfredo Valido; Philip H Warren
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Can optimal resource allocation models explain why ectotherms grow larger in cold?

Authors:  J Kozlowski; M Czarnoleski; M Danko
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.326

8.  Biphasic growth in fish I: theoretical foundations.

Authors:  Christopher Quince; Peter A Abrams; Brian J Shuter; Nigel P Lester
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 2.691

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.