Literature DB >> 23364495

Evaluation of vitamin D medicines and dietary supplements and the physicochemical analysis of selected formulations.

S Garg1, D Sabri, J Kanji, P S Rakkar, Y Lee, N Naidoo, D Svirskis.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Vitamin D is purported to offer wide ranging and numerous health benefits leading to increased interest from manufacturers of medicines and dietary supplements. Elderly patients frequently require vitamin D supplementation due to reduced sun exposure and dietary intake. There are ever increasing numbers of vitamin D formulations in the global market. However, due to a lack of regulatory restrictions for some of these products the quality of these dosage forms can be of some concern.
OBJECTIVES: To study vitamin D formulations available in the global market and evaluate physic-chemical properties of selected formulations from the New Zealand market.
METHOD: The first component of this study consisted of a search for different vitamin D formulations available in selected countries. The second component of the study involved assaying selected vitamin D formulations available in New Zealand. Vitamin D was extracted from capsule, tablet and emulsion formulations and quantified using a validated High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) method.
RESULTS: Of the 14 analysed formulations, only 60% were within 100±10 % of the label claim. The two registered, prescription formulations available exhibited vitamin D levels of 90±4% and 97±2% of the labeled amount, while non-registered, non-prescription dietary supplements had vitamin D levels ranging from 8±2% to 201±29% of the labeled amount.
CONCLUSIONS: Dietary supplements do not require strict regulation and showed a large variation in the percentage label claim of vitamin D. Prescription formulations which are more strictly regulated gave content values within standard acceptance ranges. Vitamin D has proven health benefits and also the potential to cause harm, therefore there is a need for tougher regulations of dietary supplements to ensure acceptable quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23364495     DOI: 10.1007/s12603-012-0090-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging        ISSN: 1279-7707            Impact factor:   4.075


  10 in total

Review 1.  Herbal medicines today and the roots of modern pharmacology.

Authors:  P Goldman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-10-16       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Steroids masquerading as natural herbs: a case for regulatory control.

Authors:  Shane Reti
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  2002-08-09

3.  Overview of the proceedings from Experimental Biology 2004 symposium: vitamin D insufficiency: a significant risk factor in chronic diseases and potential disease-specific biomarkers of vitamin D sufficiency.

Authors:  Mona S Calvo; Susan J Whiting
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 4.  Vitamin D deficiency.

Authors:  Michael F Holick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Patients' evaluation of shape, size and colour of solid dosage forms.

Authors:  A B Overgaard; J Højsted; R Hansen; J Møller-Sonnergaard; L L Christrup
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2001-10

6.  Vitamin D: drug of the future. A new therapeutic approach.

Authors:  N Gueli; W Verrusio; A Linguanti; F Di Maio; A Martinez; B Marigliano; M Cacciafesta
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.250

7.  Vitamin D2 is much less effective than vitamin D3 in humans.

Authors:  Laura A G Armas; Bruce W Hollis; Robert P Heaney
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 8.  Vitamin D and aging: old concepts and new insights.

Authors:  Beate Lanske; M Shawkat Razzaque
Journal:  J Nutr Biochem       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 6.048

Review 9.  Role of vitamin D in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  X Palomer; J M González-Clemente; F Blanco-Vaca; D Mauricio
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 6.577

Review 10.  Vitamin D: importance in the prevention of cancers, type 1 diabetes, heart disease, and osteoporosis.

Authors:  Michael F Holick
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.045

  10 in total
  11 in total

1.  The short-term impact of vitamin D-based hip fracture prevention in older adults in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Chris D Poole; Jamie C Smith; J Stephen Davies
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Commentary on the medico-legal aspects of prescribing vitamin D.

Authors:  Scott Downham; Christopher Holt; Frances Dockery; Andrew J Webb
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  A review of the growing risk of vitamin D toxicity from inappropriate practice.

Authors:  Peter N Taylor; J Stephen Davies
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  The medico-legal aspects of prescribing vitamin D.

Authors:  John S Davies; Chris D Poole; Peter Feldschreiber
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  The clinical relevance of native vitamin D in pediatric kidney disease.

Authors:  Sushmita Banerjee; Jayati Sengupta; Surupa Basu
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 3.651

6.  Hypervitaminosis D and nephrocalcinosis: too much of a good thing?

Authors:  Mandy Wan; Jignesh Patel; Greta Rait; Rukshana Shroff
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.651

7.  Nephrocalcinosis in children who received high-dose vitamin D.

Authors:  Tzu-Hua Lin; Hsiang-Ju Lu; Chao-Hsu Lin; Ming-Dar Lee; Brian Pin-Hsuan Chang; Chun-Chen Lin; Jeng-Daw Tsai
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.651

8.  Disparity in cholecalciferol content of commercial preparations available in India.

Authors:  Rajesh Khadgawat; Rekha Ramot; K M Chacko; R K Marwaha
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-11

Review 9.  Iranian consensus on use of vitamin D in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Soodeh Razeghi Jahromi; Mohammad Ali Sahraian; Mansoureh Togha; Behnaz Sedighi; Vahid Shayegannejad; Alireza Nickseresht; Shahriar Nafissi; Niayesh Mohebbi; Nastran Majdinasab; Mohsen Foroughipour; Masoud Etemadifar; Nahid Beladi Moghadam; Hormoz Ayramlou; Fereshteh Ashtari; Shekoofe Alaie
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 2.474

10.  Oral vitamin D supplementation at five times the recommended allowance marginally affects serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in dogs.

Authors:  Lauren R Young; Robert C Backus
Journal:  J Nutr Sci       Date:  2016-07-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.