Literature DB >> 23364284

Measuring presenteeism: which questionnaire to use in physical activity research?

Helen Elizabeth Brown1, Nicola Burton, Nicholas David Gilson, Wendy Brown.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An emerging area of interest in workplace health is presenteeism; the measurable extent to which physical or psychosocial symptoms, conditions and disease adversely affect the work productivity of those who choose to remain at work. Given established links between presenteeism and health, and health and physical activity, presenteeism could be an important outcome in workplace physical activity research. This study provides a narrative review of questionnaires for use in such research.
METHODS: Eight self-report measures of presenteeism were identified. Information regarding development, constructs measured and psychometric properties was extracted from relevant articles.
RESULTS: Questionnaires were largely self-administered, had 4-44 items, and recall periods ranging from 1 week to 1 year. Items were identified as assessing work performance, physical tolerance, psychological well-being and social or role functioning. Samples used to test questionnaires were predominantly American male employees, with an age range of 30-59 years. All instruments had undergone psychometric assessment, most commonly discriminant and construct validity.
CONCLUSION: Based on instrument characteristics, the range of conceptual foci covered and acceptable measurement properties, the Health and Work Questionnaire, Work Ability Index, and Work Limitations Questionnaire are suggested as most suitable for further exploring the relationship between physical activity and presenteeism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23364284     DOI: 10.1123/jpah.2011-0307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Act Health        ISSN: 1543-3080


  7 in total

1.  Presenteeism, stress resilience, and physical activity in older manual workers: a person-centred analysis.

Authors:  Cecilie Thogersen-Ntoumani; Julie Black; Magnus Lindwall; Anna Whittaker; George M Balanos
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2017-03-09

2.  Associations between Coping Profile and Work Performance in a Cohort of Japanese Employees.

Authors:  Yuichiro Otsuka; Osamu Itani; Yuuki Matsumoto; Yoshitaka Kaneita
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  An intervention to reduce sitting and increase light-intensity physical activity at work: Design and rationale of the 'Stand & Move at Work' group randomized trial.

Authors:  Matthew P Buman; Sarah L Mullane; Meynard J Toledo; Sarah A Rydell; Glenn A Gaesser; Noe C Crespo; Peter Hannan; Linda Feltes; Brenna Vuong; Mark A Pereira
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 4.  The Impact of Active Workstations on Workplace Productivity and Performance: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Samson O Ojo; Daniel P Bailey; Angel M Chater; David J Hewson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Factors associated with presenteeism due to work-related musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Giselle de Santana Vilasboas Dantas; Jefferson Paixão Cardoso
Journal:  Rev Bras Med Trab       Date:  2020-12-11

6.  Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a physical activity loyalty scheme for behaviour change maintenance: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Ruth F Hunter; Sarah F Brennan; Jianjun Tang; Oliver J Smith; Jennifer Murray; Mark A Tully; Chris Patterson; Alberto Longo; George Hutchinson; Lindsay Prior; David P French; Jean Adams; Emma McIntosh; Frank Kee
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Impact of a workplace 'sit less, move more' program on efficiency-related outcomes of office employees.

Authors:  Anna Puig-Ribera; Judit Bort-Roig; Maria Giné-Garriga; Angel M González-Suárez; Iván Martínez-Lemos; Jesús Fortuño; Joan C Martori; Laura Muñoz-Ortiz; Raimon Milà; Nicholas D Gilson; Jim McKenna
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 3.295

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.