| Literature DB >> 23364076 |
Do Thi Thanh Toan1, Wenbiao Hu, Pham Quang Thai, Luu Ngoc Hoat, Pamela Wright, Pim Martens.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Dengue fever (DF) in Vietnam remains a serious emerging arboviral disease, which generates significant concerns among international health authorities. Incidence rates of DF have increased significantly during the last few years in many provinces and cities, especially Hanoi. The purpose of this study was to detect DF hot spots and identify the disease dynamics dispersion of DF over the period between 2004 and 2009 in Hanoi, Vietnam.Entities:
Keywords: Hanoi; Vietnam; dengue fever; dynamic dispersion; hotspots
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23364076 PMCID: PMC3556563 DOI: 10.3402/gha.v6i0.18632
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Glob Health Action ISSN: 1654-9880 Impact factor: 2.640
Fig. 1Location of the study area – Hanoi, Vietnam.
Descriptive statistics of monthly numbers of postcode areas with notified dengue cases
| Period | Mean | SD | Minimum | Q1 | Median | Q3 | Maximum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004–2005 | 41.00 | 32.36 | 5 | 15.75 | 36 | 59 | 95 |
| 2006–2007 | 49.33 | 32.47 | 8 | 24.25 | 47 | 72.25 | 104 |
| 2008–2009 | 79.33 | 45.53 | 17 | 36.75 | 74 | 122.5 | 146 |
Q1, first quartile value.
Q3, third quartile value.
Fig. 2Numbers of dengue cases () and postcode areas with dengue notifications () between January 2004 and December 2009 in Hanoi.
Fig. 3Boxplots of the seasonal distribution of numbers of postcode areas with dengue infection in three periods in Hanoi. The boxplots display the values of the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles.
Fig. 4Map showing raw dengue incidence rates in three periods.
Spatial autocorrelation analysis for dengue in Hanoi, 2004–2009
| Period | Annual incidence | Moran's I | E(I) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004–2005 | 226.32 | 0.19 | −0.011 | 0.001 |
| 2006–2007 | 1049.78 | 0.32 | −0.007 | 0.001 |
| 2008–2009 | 3774.49 | 0.22 | −0.006 | 0.001 |
The clusters of dengue cases detected using the purely temporal analysis
| Year | Cluster time frame | Total days of cluster | Obs | Exp | Relative risk | LLR |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 4/8–1/12 | 118 | 216 | 160.30 | 1.90 | 17.68 | 0.001 |
| 2005 | 5/6–1/12 | 177 | 246 | 167.56 | 14.26 | 74.0 | 0.001 |
| 2006 | 5/6–1/12 | 177 | 1,679 | 1,556.38 | 2.30 | 45.39 | 0.001 |
| 2007 | 5/7–31/12 | 177 | 1,051 | 937.56 | 1.88 | 33.36 | 0.001 |
| 2008 | 4/8–16/12 | 133 | 992 | 886.41 | 1.60 | 23.84 | 0.001 |
| 2009 | 20/6–16/12 | 179 | 7,725 | 7,634.84 | 1.34 | 12.64 | 0.001 |
The number of observed cases in a cluster.
The number of expected cases in a cluster.
Log likelihood ratio.
The clusters of dengue cases detected using the purely spatial analysis
| Year | Location | Obs | Exp | Relative risk | LLR |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | A | Thanh Tri | 175 | 150.08 | 1.33 | 3.56 | 0.932 |
| 2005 | A | Hai Ba Trung, Hoang Mai | 65 | 37.10 | 2.01 | 10.4 | 0.002 |
| B | Thanh Xuan, Dong Da | 128 | 96.19 | 1.66 | 8.18 | 0.017 | |
| 2006 | A | Dong Da, Tay Ho, Long Bien | 833 | 806.05 | 1.06 | 0.81 | 1.000 |
| 2007 | A | Dong Da, Ba Dinh | 658 | 609.28 | 1.17 | 3.89 | 1.000 |
| 2008 | A | Tu Liem, Cau Giay | 238 | 215.30 | 1.13 | 1.41 | 1.000 |
| 2009 | A | Hoan Kiem, Hai Ba Trung | 2,346 | 2323.1 | 1.02 | 0.16 | 1.000 |
The number of observed cases in a cluster.
The number of expected cases in a cluster.
Log likelihood ratio.
A: Most likely cluster; B: Secondary cluster.
SaTScan statistics for space–time clusters with significantly higher incidence in Hanoi from 2004 to 2009 (most likely cluster)
| Location | Radius (km) | Time frame | Relative risk |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hoang Mai | 2.50 | 4/8–19/7/2004 | 2.03 | 0.001 |
| Thanh Xuan | 0.68 | 17/11–31/12/2005 | 2.66 | 0.001 |
| Dong Da | 0.64 | 2–16/11/2006 | 3.51 | 0.001 |
| Dong Da | 0.99 | 17/11–16/12/2007 | 3.38 | 0.001 |
| Hoang Mai | 0.29 | 19/8–2/10/2008 | 5.58 | 0.001 |
| Hoan Kiem, Hai Ba Trung | 1.56 | 2–16/11/2009 | 6.41 | 0.001 |
Fig. 5Scatterplot of significant space–time clusters in Hanoi from 2004 to 2009.
Changes of dengue fever in latitude and longitude, Hanoi, 2004–2009
| Change in periods | Latitude | Longitude | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |
| Period 3–Period 1 | 1.17 | 1.02–1.34 | 1.06 | 0.93–1.34 |
| Period 2–Period 1 | 0.94 | 0.85–1.03 | 0.98 | 0.87–1.11 |
| Period 3–Period 2 | 1.09 | 0.99–1.22 | 0.98 | 0.89–1.06 |
Note: Period 1: 2004–2005; Period 2: 2006–2007; Period 3: 2008–2009.