Literature DB >> 23363879

Oral sodium thiosulfate as maintenance therapy for calcific uremic arteriolopathy: a case series.

Meteb M AlBugami1, Jo-Anne Wilson, James R Clarke, Steven D Soroka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Calcific uremic arteriolopathy (CUA) is a rare but serious disorder affecting 4% of dialysis patients. Intravenous sodium thiosulfate (IV STS) has been shown as an effective treatment. In Canada, the average cost of IV STS is about CAD 12,000 per month, while the cost of compounded oral STS is CAD 45 per month.
METHODS: Prospective cohort where all patients diagnosed with CUA during the year 2011 were included. They were treated initially with IV STS. Afterwards, each patient had a baseline bone scan and was started on oral STS for a total of 6 months followed by a repeat bone scan. A single radiologist, blinded to the dates of both scans for a given patient, read all scans.
RESULTS: Four patients were studied. The intravenous dose used was 25 g three times a week for an average duration of 131 days. After the maintenance therapy, 2 patients developed further regression of the lesions, 1 had stable lesions, and 1 got worse; however, nonadherence to the drug was confirmed. The oral medication was well tolerated with no reported side effects.
CONCLUSION: Oral STS, after IV STS, seems to stabilize, or even improve CUA lesions, and therefore could be useful as maintenance therapy, especially since its cost is much more reasonable than IV STS and due to the ongoing shortage of the IV formulation.
Copyright © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23363879     DOI: 10.1159/000346410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Nephrol        ISSN: 0250-8095            Impact factor:   3.754


  8 in total

1.  Painful skin ulcers in a hemodialysis patient.

Authors:  Stuart M Sprague
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Removing the problem: parathyroidectomy for calciphylaxis.

Authors:  Mohamed Hassanein; Heather Laird-Fick; Richa Tikaria; Saleh Aldasouqi
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-12-22

3.  Sodium thiosulphate attenuates brain inflammation induced by systemic lipopolysaccharide administration in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Gonzalo Acero; Miryam Nava Catorce; Ricardo González-Mendoza; Marco Antonio Meraz-Rodríguez; Luis Fernando Hernández-Zimbron; Roberto González-Salinas; Goar Gevorkian
Journal:  Inflammopharmacology       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 4.473

Review 4.  Wound Healing in Patients With Impaired Kidney Function.

Authors:  Natallia Maroz; Richard Simman
Journal:  J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec       Date:  2014-06-08

5.  The renal mitochondrial dysfunction in patients with vascular calcification is prevented by sodium thiosulfate.

Authors:  Prithvika Krishnaraj; Sriram Ravindran; Gino A Kurian
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 6.  Calcific uremic arteriolopathy in end stage renal disease: pathophysiology and management.

Authors:  Preethi Yerram; Kunal Chaudhary
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

7.  Sulfate but not thiosulfate reduces calculated and measured urinary ionized calcium and supersaturation: implications for the treatment of calcium renal stones.

Authors:  Allen Rodgers; Daniel Gauvin; Samuel Edeh; Shameez Allie-Hamdulay; Graham Jackson; John C Lieske
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Successful Management of Calciphylaxis in a Kidney Transplant Patient: Case Report.

Authors:  Thomas Welte; Frederic Arnold; Kristin Technau-Hafsi; Elke Neumann-Haefelin; Rika Wobser; Stefan Zschiedrich; Gerd Walz; Albrecht Kramer-Zucker
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2016-03-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.