Literature DB >> 23363779

Assessment of left ventricular mass in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography using single-beat capture image.

Sung-A Chang1, Hyung-Kwan Kim, Sang-Chol Lee, Eun-Young Kim, Seung-Hee Hahm, Oh Min Kwon, Seung Woo Park, Yeon Hyeon Choe, Jae K Oh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) mass is an important prognostic indicator in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Although LV mass can be easily calculated using conventional echocardiography, it is based on geometric assumptions and has inherent limitations in asymmetric left ventricles. Real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic (RT3DE) imaging with single-beat capture provides an opportunity for the accurate estimation of LV mass. The aim of this study was to validate this new technique for LV mass measurement in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
METHODS: Sixty-nine patients with adequate two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional echocardiographic image quality underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging and echocardiography on the same day. Real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic images were acquired using an Acuson SC2000 system, and CMR-determined LV mass was considered the reference standard. Left ventricular mass was derived using the formula of the American Society of Echocardiography (M-mode mass), the 2D-based truncated ellipsoid method (2D mass), and the RT3DE technique (RT3DE mass).
RESULTS: The mean time for RT3DE analysis was 5.85 ± 1.81 min. Intraclass correlation analysis showed a close relationship between RT3DE and CMR LV mass (r = 0.86, P < .0001). However, LV mass by the M-mode or 2D technique showed a smaller intraclass correlation coefficient compared with CMR-determined mass (r = 0.48, P = .01, and r = 0.71, P < .001, respectively). Bland-Altman analysis showed reasonable limits of agreement between LV mass by RT3DE imaging and by CMR, with a smaller positive bias (19.5 g [9.1%]) compared with that by the M-mode and 2D methods (-35.1 g [-20.2%] and 30.6 g [17.6%], respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: RT3DE measurement of LV mass using the single-beat capture technique is practical and more accurate than 2D or M-mode LV mass in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Copyright © 2013 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23363779     DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2012.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  9 in total

1.  Left Ventricular Mass in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Assessed by 2D-Echocardiography: Validation with Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Maria Angela Losi; Massimo Imbriaco; Grazia Canciello; Filomena Pacelli; Carlo Di Nardo; Raffaella Lombardi; Raffaele Izzo; Costantino Mancusi; Andrea Ponsiglione; Serena Dell'Aversana; Alberto Cuocolo; Giovanni de Simone; Bruno Trimarco; Emanuele Barbato
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  A new method to quantify left ventricular mass by 2D echocardiography.

Authors:  Charlotte Burup Kristensen; Katrine Aagaard Myhr; Frederik Fasth Grund; Niels Vejlstrup; Christian Hassager; Raj Mattu; Rasmus Mogelvang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  The Prevalence of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Obese Children Varies Depending on the Method Utilized to Determine Left Ventricular Mass.

Authors:  Joseph Mahgerefteh; Jarrett Linder; Ellen J Silver; Penelope Hazin; Scott Ceresnak; Daphne Hsu; Leo Lopez
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 4.  The clinical benefits of adding a third dimension to assess the left ventricle with echocardiography.

Authors:  Luigi P Badano
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2014-05-15

5.  Assessment of left ventricular function in chronic alcoholics by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography.

Authors:  Yuanzheng Wang; Guoxin Shan; Jiaqi Shen; Qiao Zhou; Bijun Tan; Yue Liu; Runlan Luo; Shifen Zhao; Wenjun Bi; Fangyi Yao; Guangsen Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 6.  Multimodality Imaging for Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Severity Grading: A Methodological Review.

Authors:  Maaike Alkema; Ernest Spitzer; Osama I I Soliman; Christian Loewe
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2016-12-28

Review 7.  The role of echocardiography for diagnosis and prognostic stratification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Leonard Mandeş; Monica Roşca; Daniela Ciupercă; Bogdan A Popescu
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2020-04-16

Review 8.  Cardiac Imaging in Anderson-Fabry Disease: Past, Present and Future.

Authors:  Roberta Esposito; Ciro Santoro; Giulia Elena Mandoli; Vittoria Cuomo; Regina Sorrentino; Lucia La Mura; Maria Concetta Pastore; Francesco Bandera; Flavio D'Ascenzi; Alessandro Malagoli; Giovanni Benfari; Antonello D'Andrea; Matteo Cameli
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 9.  3D and 4D Ultrasound: Current Progress and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Susan H Kwon; Aasha S Gopal
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2017-11-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.