Literature DB >> 23363118

Advantages from bilateral hearing in speech perception in noise with simulated cochlear implants and residual acoustic hearing.

Tim Schoof1, Tim Green, Andrew Faulkner, Stuart Rosen.   

Abstract

Acoustic simulations were used to study the contributions of spatial hearing that may arise from combining a cochlear implant with either a second implant or contralateral residual low-frequency acoustic hearing. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured in twenty-talker babble. Spatial separation of speech and noise was simulated using a spherical head model. While low-frequency acoustic information contralateral to the implant simulation produced substantially better SRTs there was no effect of spatial cues on SRT, even when interaural differences were artificially enhanced. Simulated bilateral implants showed a significant head shadow effect, but no binaural unmasking based on interaural time differences, and weak, inconsistent overall spatial release from masking. There was also a small but significant non-spatial summation effect. It appears that typical cochlear implant speech processing strategies may substantially reduce the utility of spatial cues, even in the absence of degraded neural processing arising from auditory deprivation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23363118     DOI: 10.1121/1.4773274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  3 in total

1.  Binaural advantages in users of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant devices.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Natalie Pak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.

Authors:  Ben Williges; Mathias Dietz; Volker Hohmann; Tim Jürgens
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.293

3.  Effects of Cochlear Implantation on Binaural Hearing in Adults With Unilateral Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Margaret T Dillon; Meredith A Rooth; English R King; Ellen J Deres; Craig A Buchman; Harold C Pillsbury; Kevin D Brown
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.