Literature DB >> 23362808

The relationship between cardiac autonomic function and maximal oxygen uptake response to high-intensity intermittent-exercise training.

Stephen H Boutcher1, Young Park, Sarah Louise Dunn, Yati N Boutcher.   

Abstract

Major individual differences in the maximal oxygen uptake response to aerobic training have been documented. Vagal influence on the heart has been shown to contribute to changes in aerobic fitness. Whether vagal influence on the heart also predicts maximal oxygen uptake response to interval-sprinting training, however, is undetermined. Thus, the relationship between baseline vagal activity and the maximal oxygen uptake response to interval-sprinting training was examined. Exercisers (n = 16) exercised three times a week for 12 weeks, whereas controls did no exercise (n = 16). Interval-sprinting consisted of 20 min of intermittent sprinting on a cycle ergometer (8 s sprint, 12 s recovery). Maximal oxygen uptake was assessed using open-circuit spirometry. Vagal influence was assessed through frequency analysis of heart rate variability. Participants were aged 22 ± 4.5 years and had a body mass of 72.7 ± 18.9 kg, a body mass index of 26.9 ± 3.9 kg · m(-2), and a maximal oxygen uptake of 28 ± 7.4 ml · kg(-1) · min(-1). Overall increase in maximal oxygen uptake after the training programme, despite being anaerobic in nature, was 19 ± 1.2%. Change in maximal oxygen uptake was correlated with initial baseline heart rate variability high-frequency power in normalised units (r = 0.58; P < 0.05). Thus, cardiac vagal modulation of heart rate was associated with the aerobic training response after 12 weeks of high-intensity intermittent-exercise. The mechanisms underlying the relationship between the aerobic training response and resting heart rate variability need to be established before practical implications can be identified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23362808     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2012.762984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  10 in total

1.  High responders and low responders: factors associated with individual variation in response to standardized training.

Authors:  Theresa N Mann; Robert P Lamberts; Michael I Lambert
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  The Effect of Low-Volume High-Intensity Interval Training on Body Composition and Cardiorespiratory Fitness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rachelle N Sultana; Angelo Sabag; Shelley E Keating; Nathan A Johnson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Hierarchical framework to improve individualised exercise prescription in adults: a critical review.

Authors:  Elias Lehtonen; Dominique Gagnon; Daniela Eklund; Kaisa Kaseva; Juha Evert Peltonen
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2022-06-07

4.  Somatic, Endurance Performance and Heart Rate Variability Profiles of Professional Soccer Players Grouped According to Age.

Authors:  Michal Botek; Jakub Krejčí; Andrew J McKune; Iva Klimešová
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 2.193

5.  Effects of Short- and Long-Term Detraining on Maximal Oxygen Uptake in Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jie Zheng; Tian Pan; Yankang Jiang; Yupeng Shen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 3.246

6.  Heart Rate Variability-Guided Training for Improving Mortality Predictors in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Agustín Manresa-Rocamora; José Manuel Sarabia; Silvia Guillen-Garcia; Patricio Pérez-Berbel; Beatriz Miralles-Vicedo; Enrique Roche; Néstor Vicente-Salar; Manuel Moya-Ramón
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Heart rate variability biofeedback: how and why does it work?

Authors:  Paul M Lehrer; Richard Gevirtz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-21

8.  Is high-intensity interval cycling feasible and more beneficial than continuous cycling for knee osteoarthritic patients? Results of a randomised control feasibility trial.

Authors:  Justin W Keogh; Josephine Grigg; Christopher J Vertullo
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  High-Intensity Functional Training Guided by Individualized Heart Rate Variability Results in Similar Health and Fitness Improvements as Predetermined Training with Less Effort.

Authors:  Justin A DeBlauw; Nicholas B Drake; Brady K Kurtz; Derek A Crawford; Michael J Carper; Amanda Wakeman; Katie M Heinrich
Journal:  J Funct Morphol Kinesiol       Date:  2021-12-13

Review 10.  Physiological Responses to Low-Volume Interval Training in Women.

Authors:  Lauren E Skelly; Celine Bailleul; Jenna B Gillen
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2021-12-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.