Literature DB >> 2336276

The effect of stimulus size on the measured threshold values in automated perimetry.

N T Choplin1, M B Sherwood, G L Spaeth.   

Abstract

Patients with severely depressed visual fields as determined by automated static perimetry are often tested with larger test stimuli in order to obtain meaningful data. "Normal" threshold values are known and included in some perimeters' data analysis programs for stimulus III, but not for larger stimuli. Using a user-defined program on the Octopus 201 perimeter to determine mean retinal sensitivity, a study was conducted in 17 normal subjects to determine the effect of stimulus size on measured threshold. With stimulus III, the mean retinal sensitivity within the central 30 degrees was 28.4 +/- 2.3 dB; it was 31.9 +/- 2.3 dB for stimulus IV, and measured 36.00 +/- 2.5 dB with stimulus V. The differences between the values are statistically significant (P less than 0.001). It is not known whether these differences can be generalized from normals to patients with glaucoma or other diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2336276     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(90)32579-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  6 in total

1.  The influence of stimulus parameters on the visual field indices by automated projection perimetry.

Authors:  M Dengler-Harles; J M Wild; M D Cole; E C O'Neill
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Rapid pupil-based assessment of glaucomatous damage.

Authors:  Yanjun Chen; Harry J Wyatt; William H Swanson; Mitchell W Dul
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  The Effect of Stimulus Size on the Reliable Stimulus Range of Perimetry.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; Shaban Demirel; Deborah Goren; Steven L Mansberger; William H Swanson
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 4.  The value of visual field testing in the era of advanced imaging: clinical and psychophysical perspectives.

Authors:  Jack Phu; Sieu K Khuu; Michael Yapp; Nagi Assaad; Michael P Hennessy; Michael Kalloniatis
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.742

5.  Long- and Short-Term Variability of Perimetry in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; William H Swanson; Steven L Mansberger
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.048

6.  Comparison of size modulation and conventional standard automated perimetry with the 24-2 test protocol in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Kazunori Hirasawa; Nobuyuki Shoji; Masayuki Kasahara; Kazuhiro Matsumura; Kimiya Shimizu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.