Literature DB >> 23362757

Multiple comparisons of organic, microbial, and fine particulate pollutants in typical indoor environments: diurnal and seasonal variations.

Sibel Mentese1, Abbas Yousefi Rad, Münevver Arisoy, Gülen Güllü.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This study was performed to investigate the possible sources as well as seasonal and diurnal variations of indoor air pollutants in widely used four different environments (house, office, kindergarten, and primary school) in which people spend most of their time. Bioaerosol levels and species, volatile organic compound (VOC) levels, and PM2.5 (particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter < or = 2.5 microm) levels were determined in different parts of these environments in parallel with outdoor sampling. Air pollution samplings were carried out in each microenvironment during five subsequent days in both winter and summer in Ankara, Turkey. The results indicated that bioaerosol, VOC, and PM2.5 levels were higher in the winter than in the summer. Moreover PM2.5 and bioaerosol levels showed remarkable daily and diurnal variations, whereas a good correlation was found between the VOC levels measured in the morning and in the afternoon. Bacteria levels were, in general, higher than fungi levels. Among the VOCs, toluene was the most predominant, whereas elevated n-hexane levels were also observed in the kindergarten and the primary school, probably due to the frequent wet cleaning during school days. According to factor analysis, several factors were found to be significantly influencing the indoor air quality (IAQ), and amongst them, VOC-based products used indoors ranked first. The overall results indicate that grab sampling in naturally ventilated places may overestimate or underestimate the IAQ due to the inhomogeneous composition of indoor air caused by irregular exchanges with the outdoor air according to the season and/or occupants' habits. IMPLICATIONS: Seasonal and diurnal variations of VOCs, PM2.5, bioaerosols in house, office, and schools were observed, in which PM2.5 and bioaeorosols showed marked both intra- and interday variability, but VOCs did not. VOC-containing products were the most common source of air pollutants affecting the indoor air quality. External factors affecting the indoor air quality were season and indirectly ventilation. A grab sample cannot be representative in evaluating the air quality of a naturally ventilated environment precisely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23362757     DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2012.714717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc        ISSN: 1096-2247            Impact factor:   2.235


  9 in total

1.  Indoor/outdoor relationships of bioaerosol concentrations in a retirement home and a school dormitory.

Authors:  Sasan Faridi; Mohammad Sadegh Hassanvand; Kazem Naddafi; Masud Yunesian; Ramin Nabizadeh; Mohammad Hossein Sowlat; Homa Kashani; Akbar Gholampour; Sadegh Niazi; Ahad Zare; Shahrokh Nazmara; Mahmood Alimohammadi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Mold and Human Health: a Reality Check.

Authors:  Andrea T Borchers; Christopher Chang; M Eric Gershwin
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 8.667

3.  A Cataluminescence Sensor Based on NiO Nanoparticles for Sensitive Detection of Acetaldehyde.

Authors:  Run-Kun Zhang; Die Wang; Yan-Jun Wu; Yi-Han Hu; Jian-Yu Chen; Jin-Can He; Jing-Xin Wang
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 4.411

4.  Non-culturable bioaerosols in indoor settings: Impact on health and molecular approaches for detection.

Authors:  Pascale Blais-Lecours; Phillipa Perrott; Caroline Duchaine
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  Changes in Reported Symptoms Attributed to Office Environments in Sweden between 1995 and 2020.

Authors:  Della Egfors; Anita Gidlöf Gunnarsson; Niklas Ricklund
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-11       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Exposure to atmospheric particulate matter enhances Th17 polarization through the aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

Authors:  Michael van Voorhis; Samantha Knopp; Walker Julliard; John H Fechner; Xiaoji Zhang; James J Schauer; Joshua D Mezrich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Environment and Health in Children Day Care Centres (ENVIRH) - Study rationale and protocol.

Authors:  J Araújo-Martins; P Carreiro Martins; J Viegas; D Aelenei; M M Cano; J P Teixeira; P Paixão; A L Papoila; P Leiria-Pinto; C Pedro; J Rosado-Pinto; I Annesi-Maesano; N Neuparth
Journal:  Rev Port Pneumol       Date:  2014-04-18

8.  Environment and Health in Children Day Care Centres (ENVIRH) - Study rationale and protocol.

Authors:  J Araújo-Martins; P Carreiro Martins; J Viegas; D Aelenei; M M Cano; J P Teixeira; P Paixão; A L Papoila; P Leiria-Pinto; C Pedro; J Rosado-Pinto; I Annesi-Maesano; N Neuparth
Journal:  Rev Port Pneumol (2006)       Date:  2014-12-15

9.  Indoor Carbon Dioxide, Fine Particulate Matter and Total Volatile Organic Compounds in Private Healthcare and Elderly Care Facilities.

Authors:  Alexandre Baudet; Estelle Baurès; Olivier Blanchard; Pierre Le Cann; Jean-Pierre Gangneux; Arnaud Florentin
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-03-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.