BACKGROUND: To optimize long-term outcomes, patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) should adopt health-promoting behaviors. Studies on health behavior in afflicted patients are scarce and comparability of study results is limited. To enlarge the body of evidence, we have developed the Health Behavior Scale-Congenital Heart Disease (HBS-CHD). AIMS: We examined the psychometric properties of the HBS-CHD by providing evidence for (a) the content validity; (b) validity based on the relationships with other variables; (c) reliability in terms of stability; and (d) responsiveness. METHODS: Ten experts rated the relevance of the HBS-CHD items. The item content validity index (I-CVI) and the averaged scale content validity index (S-CVI/Ave); the modified multi-rater Kappa and proportion of missing values for each question were calculated. Relationships with other variables were evaluated using six hypotheses that were tested in 429 adolescents with CHD. Stability of the instrument was assessed using Heise's method; and responsiveness was tested by calculating the Guyatt's Responsiveness Index (GRI). RESULTS: Overall, 86.3% of the items had a good to excellent content validity; the S-CVI/Ave (0.81) and multi-rater Kappa (0.78) were adequate. The average proportion of missing values was low (1.2%). Because five out of six hypotheses were confirmed, evidence for the validity of the HBS-CHD based on relationships with other variables was provided. The stability of the instrument could not be confirmed based on our data. The GRI showed good to excellent capacity of the HBS-CHD to detect clinical changes in the health behavior over time. CONCLUSION: We found that the HBS-CHD is a valid and responsive questionnaire to assess health behaviors in patients with CHD.
BACKGROUND: To optimize long-term outcomes, patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) should adopt health-promoting behaviors. Studies on health behavior in afflicted patients are scarce and comparability of study results is limited. To enlarge the body of evidence, we have developed the Health Behavior Scale-Congenital Heart Disease (HBS-CHD). AIMS: We examined the psychometric properties of the HBS-CHD by providing evidence for (a) the content validity; (b) validity based on the relationships with other variables; (c) reliability in terms of stability; and (d) responsiveness. METHODS: Ten experts rated the relevance of the HBS-CHD items. The item content validity index (I-CVI) and the averaged scale content validity index (S-CVI/Ave); the modified multi-rater Kappa and proportion of missing values for each question were calculated. Relationships with other variables were evaluated using six hypotheses that were tested in 429 adolescents with CHD. Stability of the instrument was assessed using Heise's method; and responsiveness was tested by calculating the Guyatt's Responsiveness Index (GRI). RESULTS: Overall, 86.3% of the items had a good to excellent content validity; the S-CVI/Ave (0.81) and multi-rater Kappa (0.78) were adequate. The average proportion of missing values was low (1.2%). Because five out of six hypotheses were confirmed, evidence for the validity of the HBS-CHD based on relationships with other variables was provided. The stability of the instrument could not be confirmed based on our data. The GRI showed good to excellent capacity of the HBS-CHD to detect clinical changes in the health behavior over time. CONCLUSION: We found that the HBS-CHD is a valid and responsive questionnaire to assess health behaviors in patients with CHD.
Entities:
Keywords:
Heart defects; adolescence; congenital; health behavior; life style; psychometric properties; reliability; validity
Authors: Lena Larsson; Bengt Johansson; Camilla Sandberg; Silke Apers; Adrienne H Kovacs; Koen Luyckx; Corina Thomet; Werner Budts; Junko Enomoto; Maayke A Sluman; Jou-Kou Wang; Jamie L Jackson; Paul Khairy; Stephen C Cook; Luis Alday; Katrine Eriksen; Mikael Dellborg; Malin Berghammer; Gwen Rempel; Samuel Menahem; Maryanne Caruana; Martha Tomlin; Alexandra Soufi; Susan M Fernandes; Kamila White; Edward Callus; Shelby Kutty; Philip Moons Journal: Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Date: 2018-11-22
Authors: Edward Callus; Silvana Pagliuca; Sara Boveri; Federico Ambrogi; Koen Luyckx; Adrienne H Kovacs; Silke Apers; Werner Budts; Junko Enomoto; Maayke A Sluman; Jou-Kou Wang; Jamie L Jackson; Paul Khairy; Stephen C Cook; Shanthi Chidambarathanu; Luis Alday; Katrine Eriksen; Mikael Dellborg; Malin Berghammer; Bengt Johansson; Andrew S Mackie; Samuel Menahem; Maryanne Caruana; Gruschen Veldtman; Alexandra Soufi; Susan M Fernandes; Kamila White; Shelby Kutty; Philip Moons Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2021-02-10 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Chun-Wei Lu; Jou-Kou Wang; Hsiao-Ling Yang; Adrienne H Kovacs; Koen Luyckx; Francisco Javier Ruperti-Repilado; Alexander Van De Bruaene; Junko Enomoto; Maayke A Sluman; Jamie L Jackson; Paul Khairy; Stephen C Cook; Shanthi Chidambarathanu; Luis Alday; Erwin Oechslin; Katrine Eriksen; Mikael Dellborg; Malin Berghammer; Bengt Johansson; Andrew S Mackie; Samuel Menahem; Maryanne Caruana; Gruschen Veldtman; Alexandra Soufi; Susan M Fernandes; Kamila White; Edward Callus; Shelby Kutty; Silke Apers; Philip Moons Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2022-04-26 Impact factor: 6.106
Authors: Koen Joosten; Kelly van der Velde; Pieter Joosten; Hans Rutten; Jessie Hulst; Karolijn Dulfer Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2015-09-11 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Anna Lena Brorsson; Ewa-Lena Bratt; Philip Moons; Anna Ek; Elisabeth Jelleryd; Torun Torbjörnsdotter; Carina Sparud-Lundin Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-04-14 Impact factor: 2.692