Literature DB >> 23362115

Efficacy of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal by EDTA and citric acid.

Daniel R Herrera1, Zarina T Santos, Lidia Y Tay, Emmanuel J Silva, Alessandro D Loguercio, Brenda P F A Gomes.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different activation protocols for chelating agents used after chemo-mechanical preparation (CMP), for smear layer (SL) removal. Forty-five single-rooted human premolars with straight canals and fully formed apex were selected. The specimens were randomly divided into three groups depending on the chelating agent used for smear layer removal: distilled water (DW, control group); 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA); and 10% citric acid (CA). Each group was further divided into three subgroups according to the activation protocol used: no-activation (NA), manual dynamic activation (MDA), or sonic activation (SA). After CMP, all specimens were sectioned and processed for observation of the apical thirds by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Two calibrated evaluators attributed scores to each specimen. The differences between activation protocols were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Friedman and Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used for comparison between each root canal third. When chelating agents were activated, either by MDA or SA, it was obtained the best cleaning results with no significant difference between EDTA and CA (P > 0.05). Sonic activation showed the best results when root canal thirds were analyzed, in comparison to MDA and NA groups (P < 0.05). The activation of chelating agents, independent of the protocol used, benefits smear layer removal from root canals.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23362115     DOI: 10.1002/jemt.22175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microsc Res Tech        ISSN: 1059-910X            Impact factor:   2.769


  7 in total

1.  Efficacy of preheated chelating agents on calcium ion removal from instrumented root canals.

Authors:  Meltem Kucuk; Yasar-Meric Tunca; Onur Erdem; Serdar Cetinkaya; Kadriye Demirkaya
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-10-01

2.  Synergistic antimicrobial action of chlorhexidine and ozone in endodontic treatment.

Authors:  Rita Noites; Cidália Pina-Vaz; Rita Rocha; Manuel Fontes Carvalho; Acácio Gonçalves; Irene Pina-Vaz
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Effect of acidic solutions on the microhardness of dentin and set OrthoMTA and their cytotoxicity on murine macrophage.

Authors:  Soram Oh; Hiran Perinpanayagam; Yoon Lee; Jae-Won Kum; Yeon-Jee Yoo; Sang-Min Lim; Seok Woo Chang; Won-Jun Shon; Woocheol Lee; Seung-Ho Baek; Kee-Yeon Kum
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2015-12-01

4.  Effect of different chelating agents on the bond strength of a silicone-based root canal sealer to root dentin.

Authors:  Hakan Gokturk; Ismail Ozkocak; Fevzi Buyukgebiz
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2020-11-05

5.  Smear Layer Removal from Root Canal Dentin and Antimicrobial Effect of Citric Acid-modified Chlorhexidine.

Authors:  Anat Dewi; Chawin Upara; Danupong Chaiariyakul; Phumisak Louwakul
Journal:  Eur Endod J       Date:  2020-12

6.  Effect of different chelating agents and their surface tension on the amount of apically extruded debris.

Authors:  Hakan Gokturk; Ismail Ozkocak; Ugur Aydin; Emine Demir Serefli
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 2.080

7.  Efficacy of four different irrigation techniques combined with 60 °C 3% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA in smear layer removal.

Authors:  Xiangjun Guo; Hui Miao; Lei Li; Shasha Zhang; Dongyan Zhou; Yan Lu; Ligeng Wu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 2.757

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.