Literature DB >> 23361453

[Male circumcision is not associated with an increased prevalence of erectile dysfunction: results of the Cottbus 10,000-men survey].

B Hoschke1, S Fenske, S Brookman-May, I Spivak, C Gilfrich, H-M Fritsche, I Wolff, M May.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are conflicting data regarding the significance of the presence of the male prepuce or circumcision on erectile function and sexual satisfaction in men.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 10,000 men selected according to the age distribution of the city of Cottbus (Brandenburg, Germany) were provided with a questionnaire comprised of 35 items integrating the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-6) and further questions on sexual quality of life, comorbidities and previous surgical treatment. Of the men who completed the questionnaire 2,499 were living in a partnership and formed the study group for this survey. Based on the IIEF-6, two study endpoints (SEP) were defined (point values ≤ 25/SEP1 and ≤ 21/SEP2). By multivariable logistic regression analysis the independent influence of previous circumcision on both endpoints was assessed. Furthermore, a correlation between sexual satisfaction of men and circumcision was also analyzed.
RESULTS: Of the study group167 men had undergone circumcision (6.7 %). Erectile dysfunction (ED) was present in 40.1 % of men based on SEP1 (minor to severe ED) and in 27.8 % based on SEP2 (moderate to severe ED). Based on SEP1 as well as SEP2 age, history of smoking, hypertension, diabetes, chronic ischemic heart disease, peripheral arterial obstructive disease, cirrhosis of the liver and history of pelvic surgery were found to have an independent influence on the presence of ED. A status after circumcision did not show an independent influence on either study endpoints (SEP1: OR 1.36, p=0.174; SEP2: OR 1.42, p=0.175). Furthermore, there was no significant correlation between sexual satisfaction of men and a history of circumcision.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the present study which represents the largest survey worldwide on male ED using the IIEF as a validated instrument, it could not be confirmed that the prevalence of ED is increased in men following circumcision. Sexual satisfaction of men in this study was independent of the presence of the prepuce.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23361453     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-012-3112-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  24 in total

1.  A child's right to circumcision.

Authors:  M D Freeman
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  A preliminary poll of men circumcised in infancy or childhood.

Authors:  T Hammond
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Worry, desire, and sexual satisfaction and their association with severity of ED and age.

Authors:  Oliver Gralla; Nina Knoll; Stephan Fenske; Inna Spivak; Marga Hoffmann; Claudia Rönnebeck; Severin Lenk; Bernd Hoschke; Matthias May
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  [Circumcision of boys unable to consent].

Authors:  H Putzke; M Stehr; H-G Dietz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Male circumcision and sexual function in men and women: a survey-based, cross-sectional study in Denmark.

Authors:  Morten Frisch; Morten Lindholm; Morten Grønbæk
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  Impotence and adult circumcision.

Authors:  J M Stinson
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 1.798

7.  Sexual dysfunction in the United States: prevalence and predictors.

Authors:  E O Laumann; A Paik; R C Rosen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-02-10       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Adult male circumcision: effects on sexual function and sexual satisfaction in Kisumu, Kenya.

Authors:  John N Krieger; Supriya D Mehta; Robert C Bailey; Kawango Agot; Jeckoniah O Ndinya-Achola; Corette Parker; Stephen Moses
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 3.802

9.  Sensation and sexual arousal in circumcised and uncircumcised men.

Authors:  Kimberley Payne; Lea Thaler; Tuuli Kukkonen; Serge Carrier; Yitzchak Binik
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 3.802

10.  Removal of foreskin remnants in circumcised adults for treatment of premature ejaculation.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Namavar; Boroomand Robati
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2011-05
View more
  3 in total

1.  Effects of adult male circumcision on premature ejaculation: results from a prospective study in China.

Authors:  Jingjing Gao; Chuan Xu; Jingjing Zhang; Chaozhao Liang; Puyu Su; Zhen Peng; Kai Shi; Dongdong Tang; Pan Gao; Zhaoxiang Lu; Jishuang Liu; Lei Xia; Jiajia Yang; Zongyao Hao; Jun Zhou; Xiansheng Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Male circumcision is not associated with an increased prevalence of erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Ingmar Wolff; Matthias May; Bernd Hoschke; Sabine Brookman-May
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Estimation of country-specific and global prevalence of male circumcision.

Authors:  Brian J Morris; Richard G Wamai; Esther B Henebeng; Aaron Ar Tobian; Jeffrey D Klausner; Joya Banerjee; Catherine A Hankins
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2016-03-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.