Literature DB >> 23361432

Large balloon dilation for the treatment of recurrent bile duct stones prevents short-term recurrence in patients with previous endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Ryo Harada1, Hiroyuki Maguchi, Kuniyuki Takahashi, Akio Katanuma, Manabu Osanai, Kei Yane, Syunpei Hashigo, Maki Kaneko, Ryusuke Katoh, Shin Katoh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: Our previous study revealed the efficacy and safety of the large balloon dilation (LBD) technique. However, there is insufficient objective data about the recurrence rate. The aim of this study was to compare the recurrence rate of common bile duct (CBD) stones between patients treated with and without LBD.
METHODS: Patients with recurrent CBD stones treated between April 2006 and August 2010, and who had a history of endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES), were enrolled. Patients were excluded if they had a CBD diameter of less than 10 mm or if the diameter of their largest CBD stone was <10 mm.
RESULTS: A total of 62 consecutive patients were investigated. From April 2006 to November 2007, 32 patients were treated without LBD (non-LBD group; historical control). From December 2007 to August 2010, 30 patients underwent LBD (LBD group). The median follow-up times in the LBD and non-LBD groups were 517 and 1034 days (p < 0.001), respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significantly lower incidence of recurrent CBD stones in the LBD group than in the non-LBD group (p = 0.048).
CONCLUSIONS: LBD reduces the short-term recurrence of CBD stones in patients with previous ES.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23361432     DOI: 10.1007/s00534-012-0579-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci        ISSN: 1868-6974            Impact factor:   7.027


  8 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for the removal of bile duct stones.

Authors:  Jin Hong Kim; Min Jae Yang; Jae Chul Hwang; Byung Moo Yoo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones.

Authors:  Yuji Sakai; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Yoshiaki Kawaguchi; Nobuto Hirata; So Nakaji; Katsuya Kitamura; Shigeru Mikami; Tatsuya Fujimoto; Masashi Ijima; Eishin Kurihara; Shuhei Oana; Takayoshi Nishino; Ryo Tamura; Dai Sakamoto; Masato Nakamura; Takao Nishikawa; Harutoshi Sugiyama; Hitoshi Yoshida; Tetsuya Mine; Osamu Yokosuka
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Small sphincterotomy combined with endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation vs sphincterotomy alone for removal of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Shi-Bin Guo; Hua Meng; Zhi-Jun Duan; Chun-Yan Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Balloon dilation itself may not be a major determinant of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.

Authors:  Sung Ill Jang; Gak Won Yun; Dong Ki Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Large balloon dilation post endoscopic sphincterotomy in removal of difficult common bile duct stones: a literature review.

Authors:  Olivier Rouquette; Gilles Bommelaer; Armando Abergel; Laurent Poincloux
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for cholecystogastric fistula: A case report.

Authors:  Goshi Fujimoto
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2020-05-15

7.  Safety and efficacy of extending a previous endoscopic sphincterotomy for the treatment of retained or recurrent common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Antonios Vezakis; Andreas Polydorou; Elissaios Kontis; Eirini Pantiora; Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Georgios Fragulidis
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-10-26

8.  Analysis of symptomatic recurrences of common bile ducts stones after endoscopic removal: Factors related to early or multiple recurrences.

Authors:  Soo Jeong Han; Jae Hyuck Chang; Tae-Geun Gweon; Tae Ho Kim; Hyung-Keun Kim; Chang Whan Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 1.889

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.