Literature DB >> 23360419

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic evaluation of coadministration of lacosamide and an oral contraceptive (levonorgestrel plus ethinylestradiol) in healthy female volunteers.

Willi Cawello1, Bernd Rosenkranz, Bernhard Schmid, Werner Wierich.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether the antiepileptic drug lacosamide affects the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of a combined oral contraceptive (OC; ethinylestradiol 0.03 mg plus levonorgestrel 0.15 mg).
METHODS: This was an open-label trial in healthy female volunteers. Eligible women entered cycle 1 of the trial on the first day of menstruation. Cycle 1 was a medication-free, run-in phase of approximately 28 days to confirm that normal ovulation occurred. Volunteers with confirmed ovulation entered the subsequent cycle and started taking OCs. After establishing ovulation suppression (defined as progesterone serum concentration <5.1 nm on day 21 of the menstrual cycle) in volunteers taking the OCs in cycle 2, lacosamide 400 mg/day was administered concomitantly in the subsequent cycle (cycle 3). The pharmacokinetic parameters of area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), maximum steady-state plasma drug concentration (Cmax ), and time to maximum concentration (tmax ) were measured for the OC components and lacosamide. KEY
FINDINGS: A total of 37 volunteers completed cycle 1, and 32 completed cycle 2. In each of the 31 volunteers who completed the trial (through cycle 3), pharmacodynamic assessment showed progesterone serum concentration was <5.1 nm on day 21 of cycle 2, when the OC was administered alone, and on day 21 of cycle 3, when lacosamide was administered concomitantly. The AUC of ethinylestradiol alone versus together with lacosamide was 1,067 ± 404 versus 1,173 ± 330 pg h/ml. Corresponding values of Cmax were 116.9 ± 48.8 versus 135.7 ± 28.6 pg/ml. For levonorgestrel, the AUC alone was 74.2 ± 21.4 versus 80.9 ± 18.5 ng h/ml with lacosamide. Corresponding values of Cmax were 6.7 ± 1.9 versus 7.4 ± 1.5 ng/ml. The AUC and Cmax point estimates and almost all 90% confidence intervals (except for Cmax of ethinylestradiol) for ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel (with and without lacosamide) were within the conventional bioequivalence range, and no relevant changes in tmax were observed for ethinylestradiol (1.5 ± 0.6 h alone vs. 1.4 ± 0.7 h with lacosamide) or for levonorgestrel (1.5 ± 1.0 h alone vs. 1.1 ± 0.6 h with lacosamide). Lacosamide pharmacokinetics were consistent with those observed in previous studies of lacosamide alone, with values for AUC of 113.5 ± 20.7 μg h/ml, Cmax of 13.8 ± 2.2 μg/ml, and tmax of 1.1 ± 0.4 h. SIGNIFICANCE: Lacosamide and an OC containing ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel have low potential for drug-drug interaction; therefore, coadministration of the two drugs is unlikely to result in contraceptive failure or loss of seizure control. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
© 2013 International League Against Epilepsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23360419     DOI: 10.1111/epi.12085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsia        ISSN: 0013-9580            Impact factor:   5.864


  14 in total

1.  Anti-epileptic drugs and hormonal treatments.

Authors:  Clare A Johnston; Pamela M Crawford
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 2.  Lacosamide: a review of its use as adjunctive therapy in the management of partial-onset seizures.

Authors:  Sheridan M Hoy
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.749

3.  Pharmacokinetics of lacosamide and omeprazole coadministration in healthy volunteers: results from a phase I, randomized, crossover trial.

Authors:  Willi Cawello; Christa Mueller-Voessing; Andreas Fichtner
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.859

4.  Effect of lacosamide on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of digoxin: results from a phase I, multiple-dose, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover trial.

Authors:  Willi Cawello; Christa Mueller-Voessing; Jens-Otto Andreas
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 5.  The Pharmacology and Toxicology of Third-Generation Anticonvulsant Drugs.

Authors:  Paul LaPenna; Laura M Tormoehlen
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2017-08-16

6.  Effect of age and sex on lacosamide pharmacokinetics in healthy adult subjects and adults with focal epilepsy.

Authors:  Carina Schaefer; Willi Cawello; Josef Waitzinger; Jan-Peer Elshoff
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 7.  The efficacy of lacosamide as monotherapy and adjunctive therapy in focal epilepsy and its use in status epilepticus: clinical trial evidence and experience.

Authors:  Sebastian Bauer; Laurent M Willems; Esther Paule; Christine Petschow; Johann Philipp Zöllner; Felix Rosenow; Adam Strzelczyk
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 6.570

8.  Early add-on lacosamide in a real-life setting: results of the REALLY study.

Authors:  Vicente Villanueva; Mercedes Garcés; Elena López-Gomáriz; José María Serratosa; Beatriz González-Giráldez; Jaime Parra; Juan Rodríguez-Uranga; Manuel Toledo; Francisco Javier López González; Pedro Bermejo; Pau Giner; Ascensión Castillo; Albert Molins; Dulce Campos; José Ángel Mauri; Rosario Muñoz; Macarena Bonet; Pedro Serrano-Castro; Ana del Villar; Rosa Ana Saiz-Díaz
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 9.  Pharmacokinetics and Drug Interaction of Antiepileptic Drugs in Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Giulia Iapadre; Ganna Balagura; Luca Zagaroli; Pasquale Striano; Alberto Verrotti
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 10.  Practical Use of Newer Antiepileptic Drugs as Adjunctive Therapy in Focal Epilepsy.

Authors:  Martin J Brodie
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.749

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.