Literature DB >> 23359744

The energy required to produce materials: constraints on energy-intensity improvements, parameters of demand.

Timothy G Gutowski1, Sahil Sahni, Julian M Allwood, Michael F Ashby, Ernst Worrell.   

Abstract

In this paper, we review the energy requirements to make materials on a global scale by focusing on the five construction materials that dominate energy used in material production: steel, cement, paper, plastics and aluminium. We then estimate the possibility of reducing absolute material production energy by half, while doubling production from the present to 2050. The goal therefore is a 75 per cent reduction in energy intensity. Four technology-based strategies are investigated, regardless of cost: (i) widespread application of best available technology (BAT), (ii) BAT to cutting-edge technologies, (iii) aggressive recycling and finally, and (iv) significant improvements in recycling technologies. Taken together, these aggressive strategies could produce impressive gains, of the order of a 50-56 per cent reduction in energy intensity, but this is still short of our goal of a 75 per cent reduction. Ultimately, we face fundamental thermodynamic as well as practical constraints on our ability to improve the energy intensity of material production. A strategy to reduce demand by providing material services with less material (called 'material efficiency') is outlined as an approach to solving this dilemma.

Year:  2013        PMID: 23359744     DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2012.0003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci        ISSN: 1364-503X            Impact factor:   4.226


  5 in total

1.  Material efficiency: providing material services with less material production.

Authors:  Julian M Allwood; Michael F Ashby; Timothy G Gutowski; Ernst Worrell
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  The carbon price: a toothless tool for material efficiency?

Authors:  Alexandra C H Skelton; Julian M Allwood
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Industry 1.61803: the transition to an industry with reduced material demand fit for a low carbon future.

Authors:  Julian M Allwood; Timothy G Gutowski; André C Serrenho; Alexandra C H Skelton; Ernst Worrell
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  The negative emission potential of alkaline materials.

Authors:  Phil Renforth
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 5.  Wood product carbon substitution benefits: a critical review of assumptions.

Authors:  Christina Howard; Caren C Dymond; Verena C Griess; Darius Tolkien-Spurr; G Cornelis van Kooten
Journal:  Carbon Balance Manag       Date:  2021-03-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.