Literature DB >> 23359433

Analysis of regional timelines to set up a global phase III clinical trial in breast cancer: the adjuvant lapatinib and/or trastuzumab treatment optimization experience.

Otto Metzger-Filho1, Evandro de Azambuja, Ian Bradbury, Kamal S Saini, José Bines, Sergio D Simon, Veerle Van Dooren, Gursel Aktan, Kathleen I Pritchard, Antonio C Wolff, Ian Smith, Christian Jackisch, Istvan Lang, Michael Untch, Frances Boyle, Binghe Xu, Jose Baselga, Edith A Perez, Martine Piccart-Gebhart.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study measured the time taken for setting up the different facets of adjuvant lapatinib and/or trastuzumab treatment optimization (ALTTO), an nternational phase III study being conducted in 44 participating countries.
METHODS: Time to regulatory authority (RA) approval, time to ethics committee/institutional review board (EC/IRB) approval, time from study approval by EC/IRB to first randomized patient, and time from first to last randomized patient were prospectively collected in the ALTTO study. Analyses were conducted by grouping countries into either geographic regions or economic classes as per the World Bank's criteria.
RESULTS: South America had a significantly longer time to RA approval (median: 236 days, range: 21-257 days) than Europe (median: 52 days, range: 0-151 days), North America (median: 26 days, range: 22-30 days), and Asia-Pacific (median: 62 days, range: 37-75 days). Upper-middle economies had longer times to RA approval (median: 123 days, range: 21-257 days) than high-income (median: 47 days, range: 0-112 days) and lower-middle income economies (median: 57 days, range: 37-62 days). No significant difference was observed for time to EC/IRB approval across the studied regions (median: 59 days, range 0-174 days). Overall, the median time from EC/IRB approval to first recruited patient was 169 days (range: 26-412 days).
CONCLUSION: This study highlights the long time intervals required to activate a global phase III trial. Collaborative research groups, pharmaceutical industry sponsors, and regulatory authorities should analyze the current system and enter into dialogue for optimizing local policies. This would enable faster access of patients to innovative therapies and enhance the efficiency of clinical research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23359433      PMCID: PMC3579596          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  10 in total

1.  Institutions, contracts, and academic freedom.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Drazen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-24       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Processes to activate phase III clinical trials in a Cooperative Oncology Group: the Case of Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

Authors:  David M Dilts; Alan B Sandler; Matthew Baker; Steven K Cheng; Stephen L George; Kathleen S Karas; Stephen McGuire; Gourija S Menon; Jason Reusch; Debbie Sawyer; Maren Scoggins; Amy Wu; Kai Zhou; Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Procedures for ethical review for clinical trials within the EU.

Authors:  Andreas A Schnitzbauer; Philipp E Lamby; Ingrid Mutzbauer; Carl Zuelke; Hans J Schlitt; Edward K Geissler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-05-22

4.  The clinical trials system is broken.

Authors:  Vincent T DeVita
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Oncol       Date:  2008-12

5.  Ethical and scientific implications of the globalization of clinical research.

Authors:  Seth W Glickman; John G McHutchison; Eric D Peterson; Charles B Cairns; Robert A Harrington; Robert M Califf; Kevin A Schulman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Clinical trials and tribulations. Spiraling costs threaten gridlock.

Authors:  David Malakoff
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Breast cancer in Brazil: present status and future goals.

Authors:  Brittany L Lee; Pedro Er Liedke; Carlos H Barrios; Sergio D Simon; Dianne M Finkelstein; Paul E Goss
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  A population-based assessment of specialty physician involvement in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Nancy L Keating; Arnold L Potosky; Anita Ambs; Yulei He; Mark C Hornbrook; Patricia A Ganz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Invisible barriers to clinical trials: the impact of structural, infrastructural, and procedural barriers to opening oncology clinical trials.

Authors:  David M Dilts; Alan B Sandler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Jumping higher: is it still possible? The ALTTO trial challenge.

Authors:  Gianluca Tomasello; Evandro de Azambuja; Phuong Dinh; Natasa Snoj; Martine Piccart-Gebhart
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.512

  10 in total
  14 in total

Review 1.  Integrating biomarkers in colorectal cancer trials in the West and China.

Authors:  Sabine Tejpar; Lin Shen; Xicheng Wang; Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Breast cancer: ALTTO: wake-up call for setting up clinical trials.

Authors:  Lisa Hutchinson
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Targeting the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 pathway in breast cancer.

Authors:  Senthilkumar Damodaran; Erin M Olson
Journal:  Hosp Pract (1995)       Date:  2012-10

4.  Clinical trials in a COVID-19 pandemic: Shared infrastructure for continuous learning in a rapidly changing landscape.

Authors:  Haley Hedlin; Ariadna Garcia; Yingjie Weng; Ziyuan He; Vandana Sundaram; Bryan Bunning; Vidhya Balasubramanian; Kristen Cunanan; Kristopher Kapphahn; Santosh Gummidipundi; Natasha Purington; Mary Boulos; Manisha Desai
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Evaluation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fractions in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Long-Term Trastuzumab Treatment.

Authors:  Yong Sun; Tao Li; Yuanpeng Zhang; Qiwen Zhang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-12-21

6.  Phosphoethanolamine and the danger of unproven drugs.

Authors:  Noam Pondé; Evandro de Azambuja; Felipe Ades
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2016-10-17

Review 7.  Cancer clinical research in Latin America: current situation and opportunities. Expert opinion from the first ESMO workshop on clinical trials, Lima, 2015.

Authors:  Christian Rolfo; Christian Caglevic; Denisse Bretel; David Hong; Luis E Raez; Andres F Cardona; Ana B Oton; Henry Gomez; Urania Dafni; Carlos Vallejos; Christoph Zielinski
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2016-06-17

8.  Anticancer effects of liriodenine on the cell growth and apoptosis of human breast cancer MCF-7 cells through the upregulation of p53 expression.

Authors:  Zhi-Hua Li; Jin Gao; Ping-Hua Hu; Jian-Ping Xiong
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 9.  Barriers in Latin America for the management of locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Joseph A Pinto; Luis Pinillos; Cynthia Villarreal-Garza; Zaida Morante; Manuel V Villarán; Gerson Mejía; Christian Caglevic; Alfredo Aguilar; Williams Fajardo; Franz Usuga; Marcia Carrasco; Pamela Rebaza; Ana M Posada; Indira Tirado-Hurtado; Claudio Flores; Carlos S Vallejos
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2019-01-22

10.  Barriers to Participation in Therapeutic Clinical Trials as Perceived by Community Oncologists.

Authors:  Andrew R Wong; Virginia Sun; Kevin George; Jennifer Liu; Simran Padam; Brandon A Chen; Thomas George; Arya Amini; Daneng Li; Mina S Sedrak
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2020-04-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.