PURPOSE: Medication use during pregnancy is common and increasing. Women are also increasingly getting healthcare information from sources other than their physicians. METHODS: This report summarizes an environmental scan that identified 25 active Internet sites that list medications reported to be safe for use in pregnancy and highlights the inadequate evidence base and inconsistent guidance provided by these sites. RESULTS: These lists included 245 different products, of which 103 unique components had been previously evaluated in terms of fetal risk by the Teratogen Information System (TERIS), a resource that assesses risk of birth defects after exposure under usual conditions by consensus of clinical teratology experts. For 43 (42%) of the 103 components that were listed as 'safe' on one or more of the Internet sites surveyed, the TERIS experts were unable to determine the fetal risk based on published scientific literature. For 40 (93%) of these 43, either no data were available to assess human fetal risk or the available data were limited. CONCLUSIONS: Women who see a medication on one of these 'safe' lists would be led to believe that there is no increased risk of birth defects resulting from exposure. Thus, women are being reassured that fetal exposure to these medications is safe even though a sufficient evidence base to determine the relative safety or risk does not exist.
PURPOSE: Medication use during pregnancy is common and increasing. Women are also increasingly getting healthcare information from sources other than their physicians. METHODS: This report summarizes an environmental scan that identified 25 active Internet sites that list medications reported to be safe for use in pregnancy and highlights the inadequate evidence base and inconsistent guidance provided by these sites. RESULTS: These lists included 245 different products, of which 103 unique components had been previously evaluated in terms of fetal risk by the Teratogen Information System (TERIS), a resource that assesses risk of birth defects after exposure under usual conditions by consensus of clinical teratology experts. For 43 (42%) of the 103 components that were listed as 'safe' on one or more of the Internet sites surveyed, the TERIS experts were unable to determine the fetal risk based on published scientific literature. For 40 (93%) of these 43, either no data were available to assess human fetal risk or the available data were limited. CONCLUSIONS:Women who see a medication on one of these 'safe' lists would be led to believe that there is no increased risk of birth defects resulting from exposure. Thus, women are being reassured that fetal exposure to these medications is safe even though a sufficient evidence base to determine the relative safety or risk does not exist.
Authors: Molly M Lynch; Linda B Squiers; Katherine M Kosa; Suzanne Dolina; Jennifer Gard Read; Cheryl S Broussard; Meghan T Frey; Kara N Polen; Jennifer N Lind; Suzanne M Gilboa; Janis Biermann Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2018-01
Authors: Craig Hansen; Julia D Interrante; Elizabeth C Ailes; Meghan T Frey; Cheryl S Broussard; Valerie J Godoshian; Courtney Lewis; Kara N D Polen; Amanda P Garcia; Suzanne M Gilboa Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2015-11-05 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Elizabeth C Ailes; John Zimmerman; Jennifer N Lind; Fanghui Fan; Kun Shi; Jennita Reefhuis; Cheryl S Broussard; Meghan T Frey; Janet D Cragan; Emily E Petersen; Kara D Polen; Margaret A Honein; Suzanne M Gilboa Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2020-07
Authors: Kristin Palmsten; Dani Bredesen; Meghan M JaKa; Pritika C Kumar; Jeanette Y Ziegenfuss; Elyse O Kharbanda Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2020-12-22 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Eliza Chakravarty; Megan E B Clowse; Daphnee S Pushparajah; Sarah Mertens; Caroline Gordon Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2014-02-05 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Katri Hämeen-Anttila; Hedvig Nordeng; Esa Kokki; Johanna Jyrkkä; Angela Lupattelli; Kirsti Vainio; Hannes Enlund Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Thury O Axelsdottir; Emil L Sigurdsson; Anna M Gudmundsdottir; Hildur Kristjansdottir; Johann A Sigurdsson Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2014-10-09 Impact factor: 2.581