BACKGROUND: Anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) agents have been hypothesized to increase the risk of interstitial lung disease (ILD), including its most severe manifestation, pulmonary fibrosis. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study among autoimmune disease patients who were members of Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 1998-2007. We obtained therapies from pharmacy data and diagnoses of ILD from review of X-ray and computed tomography reports. We compared new users of anti-TNF-α agents to new users of non-biologic therapies using Cox proportional hazards analysis to adjust for baseline propensity scores and time-varying use of glucocorticoids. We also made head-to-head comparisons between anti-TNF-α agents. RESULTS: Among the 8417 persons included in the analysis, 38 (0.4%) received a diagnostic code for ILD by the end of follow-up, including 23 of 4200 (0.5%) who used anti-TNF-α during study follow-up, and 15 of 5423 (0.3%) who used only non-biologic therapies. The age-standardized and gender-standardized incidence rate of ILD, per 100 person-years, was 0.21 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0-0.43] for rheumatoid arthritis and appreciably lower for other autoimmune diseases. Compared with the use of non-biologic therapies, use of anti-TNF-α therapy was not associated with a diagnosis of ILD among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.03; 95%CI 0.51-2.07), nor did head-to-head comparisons across anti-TNF-α agents suggest important differences in risk, although the number of cases available for analysis was limited. CONCLUSION: The study provides evidence that compared with non-biologic therapies, anti-TNF-α therapy does not increase the occurrence of ILD among patients with autoimmune diseases and informs research design of future safety studies of ILD.
BACKGROUND: Anti-tumornecrosis factor-α (TNF-α) agents have been hypothesized to increase the risk of interstitial lung disease (ILD), including its most severe manifestation, pulmonary fibrosis. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study among autoimmune diseasepatients who were members of Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 1998-2007. We obtained therapies from pharmacy data and diagnoses of ILD from review of X-ray and computed tomography reports. We compared new users of anti-TNF-α agents to new users of non-biologic therapies using Cox proportional hazards analysis to adjust for baseline propensity scores and time-varying use of glucocorticoids. We also made head-to-head comparisons between anti-TNF-α agents. RESULTS: Among the 8417 persons included in the analysis, 38 (0.4%) received a diagnostic code for ILD by the end of follow-up, including 23 of 4200 (0.5%) who used anti-TNF-α during study follow-up, and 15 of 5423 (0.3%) who used only non-biologic therapies. The age-standardized and gender-standardized incidence rate of ILD, per 100 person-years, was 0.21 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0-0.43] for rheumatoid arthritis and appreciably lower for other autoimmune diseases. Compared with the use of non-biologic therapies, use of anti-TNF-α therapy was not associated with a diagnosis of ILD among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.03; 95%CI 0.51-2.07), nor did head-to-head comparisons across anti-TNF-α agents suggest important differences in risk, although the number of cases available for analysis was limited. CONCLUSION: The study provides evidence that compared with non-biologic therapies, anti-TNF-α therapy does not increase the occurrence of ILD among patients with autoimmune diseases and informs research design of future safety studies of ILD.
Authors: Jeremy A Rassen; Daniel H Solomon; Jeffrey R Curtis; Lisa Herrinton; Sebastian Schneeweiss Journal: Med Care Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Tim Bongartz; Carlotta Nannini; Yimy F Medina-Velasquez; Sara J Achenbach; Cynthia S Crowson; Jay H Ryu; Robert Vassallo; Sherine E Gabriel; Eric L Matteson Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2010-06
Authors: Manuel Ramos-Casals; Roberto Perez-Alvarez; Marta Perez-de-Lis; Antoni Xaubet; Xavier Bosch Journal: Am J Med Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Sebastian Schneeweiss; Jeremy A Rassen; Robert J Glynn; Jerry Avorn; Helen Mogun; M Alan Brookhart Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Bryant R England; Punyasha Roul; Tina D Mahajan; Namrata Singh; Fang Yu; Harlan Sayles; Grant W Cannon; Brian C Sauer; Joshua F Baker; Jeffrey R Curtis; Ted R Mikuls Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Emily K Wu; Zoe I Henkes; Brion McGowan; Richard D Bell; Moises J Velez; Alexandra M Livingstone; Christopher T Ritchlin; Edward M Schwarz; Homaira Rahimi Journal: J Immunol Date: 2019-10-28 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Lorenzo Cavagna; Sara Monti; Vittorio Grosso; Nicola Boffini; Eva Scorletti; Gloria Crepaldi; Roberto Caporali Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2013-09-25 Impact factor: 3.411