Literature DB >> 23358919

Assessment of myocardial viability in patients with acute myocardial infarction by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography combined with low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography.

Lei Gong1, Dongye Li, Junhong Chen, Xiaoping Wang, Tongda Xu, Wenhua Li, Shaoyang Ren, Cheng Wang.   

Abstract

It is clinically important to determine the myocardial viability of regional wall motion abnormality segments in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The purpose of this study was to ascertain the ability and value of a combination of speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) and low dose dobutamine stress echocardiography (LDDSE) for the evaluation of viable myocardium in patients with AMI. Forty-two hospitalized patients with AMI and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction <50%) were underwent STE in conjunction with LDDSE and dual isotope simultaneous acquisition single photon emission computed tomography (DISA-SPECT). Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed subsequently in all patients. STE was used to measure radial, circumferential, and longitudinal end-systolic strain and peak systolic strain rate. The movement of each segment was observed by routine echocardiography 1, 3, and 6 months after PCI, and its improvement over time was the criterion of viable myocardium. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of DISA-SPECT for the assessment of viable myocardium were 83.6, 74.4, and 80.7%, respectively. Among the radial, circumferential, and longitudinal strain and strain rate parameters, only longitudinal strain (LS) and longitudinal strain rate (LSr) at rest and LDDSE emerged as independent predictors of viable myocardium, When combining LS and LSr at LDDSE, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the assessment of viable myocardium rose to 89.8, 90.2 and 89.9%, respectively. The sensitivity of STE in conjunction with LDDSE was similar to DISA-SPECT for detecting viable myocardium in patients with AMI, but the specificity and accuracy of STE performed with LDDSE were higher than DISA-SPECT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23358919     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-013-0185-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  36 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Grading of myocardial dysfunction by tissue Doppler echocardiography: a comparison between velocity, displacement, and strain imaging in acute ischemia.

Authors:  Helge Skulstad; Stig Urheim; Thor Edvardsen; Kai Andersen; Erik Lyseggen; Trond Vartdal; Halfdan Ihlen; Otto A Smiseth
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  NON-invasive imaging: Two dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: basic principles.

Authors:  Hermann Blessberger; Thomas Binder
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Differentiation of subendocardial and transmural infarction using two-dimensional strain rate imaging to assess short-axis and long-axis myocardial function.

Authors:  Jonathan Chan; Lizelle Hanekom; Chiew Wong; Rodel Leano; Goo-Yeong Cho; Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Imaging techniques in nuclear cardiology for the assessment of myocardial viability.

Authors:  Riemer H J A Slart; Jeroen J Bax; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Ernst E van der Wall; Rudi A J O Dierckx; Pieter L Jager
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Low dose dobutamine echocardiography is more predictive of reversible dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction than resting single photon emission computed tomographic thallium-201 scintigraphy.

Authors:  S Smart; T Stoiber; R Hellman; J Duchak; J Wynsen; M Kitapci; A Isitman; A Krasnow; B D Collier; K Sagar
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Reversal of segmental hypokinesis by coronary angioplasty in patients with unstable angina, persistent T wave inversion, and left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis. Additional evidence for myocardial stunning in humans.

Authors:  J Renkin; W Wijns; Z Ladha; J Col
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Spontaneous delayed recovery of perfusion and contraction after the first 5 weeks after anterior infarction. Evidence for the presence of hibernating myocardium in the infarcted area.

Authors:  M Galli; C Marcassa; R Bolli; P Giannuzzi; P L Temporelli; A Imparato; P L Silva Orrego; R Giubbini; A Giordano; L Tavazzi
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Contrast echocardiography using intravenous octafluoropropane and real-time perfusion imaging predicts functional recovery after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Graham S Hillis; Sharon L Mulvagh; Madhavi Gunda; Mary E Hagen; Guy S Reeder; Jae K Oh
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.251

10.  Left ventricular fibre architecture in man.

Authors:  R A Greenbaum; S Y Ho; D G Gibson; A E Becker; R H Anderson
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1981-03
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2013 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Hiram G Bezerra; Ricardo A Costa; Johan H C Reiber; Frank J Rybicki; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur A Stillman; Johan De Sutter; Nico R L Van de Veire
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Intra-procedural determination of viability by myocardial deformation imaging: a randomized prospective study in the cardiac catheter laboratory.

Authors:  Alexander Schuh; Vadim Karayusuf; Ertunc Altiok; Sandra Hamada; Jörg Schröder; Andras Keszei; Malte Kelm; Matias de la Fuente; Michael Frick; Klaus Radermacher; Nikolaus Marx; Michael Becker
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Evaluation of myocardial viability in old myocardial infarcted patients with CHF: delayed enhancement MRI vs. low-dose dobutamine stress speckle tracking echocardiography.

Authors:  Chaofan Wang; Shuguang Han; Tongda Xu; Fengli Wang; Xiaoping Wang; Jing Chen; Chunfeng Hu; Dongye Li
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 4.  The role of myocardial viability in contemporary cardiac practice.

Authors:  Abdelrahman Jamiel; Mohamad Ebid; Amjad M Ahmed; Dalia Ahmed; Mouaz H Al-Mallah
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.214

5.  Evaluation of myocardial viability in patients with acute myocardial infarction: Layer-specific analysis of 2-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography.

Authors:  Kun Liu; Yan Wang; Qiongyu Hao; Gonghao Li; Peng Chen; Dongye Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Comparison of Diagnostic Value Between STE+LDDSE and CMR-FT for Evaluating Coronary Microvascular Obstruction in Post-PCI Patients for STEMI.

Authors:  Tao Liu; Chaofan Wang; Jie Yin; Lili Wang; Haochen Xuan; Yan Yan; Junhong Chen; Jieli Bao; Dongye Li; Tongda Xu
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 2.755

7.  Dobutamine-Induced Strain and Strain Rate Predict Viability Following Fibrinolytic Therapy in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Mohamed Ismail; Wail Nammas
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-03-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.