Literature DB >> 23358054

The use of bedside electromagnetically guided nasointestinal tube for jejunal feeding of critical ill surgical patients.

Magnus Friedrich Kaffarnik1, Johan Friso Lock, Georgi Wassilew, Peter Neuhaus.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gastral nutrition in critically ill surgical patients can be difficult because of gastric paresis and a large number of patients fail to reach required caloric intake. Endoscopic or radiologic placement of nasointestinal tube is frequently performed with delay and may raise the risks for critical ill patients.
OBJECTIVE: Bedside placement of electromagnetically guided nasointestinal tube (EGNT) may reduce the risk of x-ray exposure, "time out of ward" and caloric deficit.
METHODS: All patients in a surgical intensive care unit with need of post-pyloric feeding tube placement were identified. Data were collected from Cortrak-EGNT-System and x-ray. An analysis of placement success rate, time for tube positioning and delay of enteral feeding when EGNT failed were performed.
RESULTS: 70 tubes were placed in 51 patients. After the first trial 79% were placed post-pyloric and 21% gastral. Successful postpyloric placement increased to 90% after the second trial. Placement failure occurred in 10% of all cases. In 3 patients jejunal placement was successful in modified anatomical situs after upper gastrointestinal surgery. After 20 min unsuccessful postpyloric placement, performance was stopped and declared as failure. X-ray findings correlated in 100% with Cortrak data. Time needed for placement varied from 1-20 min (mean 7.6 min).
CONCLUSIONS: Bedside positioning of electromagnetically guided nasointestinal tube is safe and effective in critically ill surgical patients. Most placements succeed, even in patients after upper GI surgery. EGNT positioning is time saving and may enhance the caloric intake.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23358054     DOI: 10.3233/THC-120704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Technol Health Care        ISSN: 0928-7329            Impact factor:   1.285


  6 in total

1.  Endoscopic versus bedside electromagnetic-guided placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes in surgical patients.

Authors:  Arja Gerritsen; Thijs de Rooij; Marcel J van der Poel; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Willem A Bemelman; Olivier R C Busch; Marc G H Besselink; Elisabeth M H Mathus-Vliegen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Endoscopic- versus x-ray-guidance for placement of nasojejunal tubes in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Guanzhen Lu; Qin Xiang; Sha Wang; Mingyue Pan; Xu Xiang; Yanling Yang; Xinyan Shi
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.940

3.  ACG Clinical Guideline: Nutrition Therapy in the Adult Hospitalized Patient.

Authors:  Stephen A McClave; John K DiBaise; Gerard E Mullin; Robert G Martindale
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Nasopharyngeal perforation by a new electromagnetically visualised enteral feeding tube.

Authors:  Faisal A Khasawneh; Mohammed G Al-Janabi; Ahmad H Ali
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-05-23

Review 5.  Electromagnetic Sensor-Guided Enteral Access Systems: A Literature Review.

Authors:  David Smithard; Nicholas A Barrett; David Hargroves; Stuart Elliot
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 6.  Use of an electromagnetic-guided device to assist with post-pyloric placement of a nasoenteral feeding tube: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fabio Catache Mancini; Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura; Mateus Pereira Funari; Igor Braga Ribeiro; Fernando Lopes Ponte Neto; Pastor Joaquin Ortiz Mendieta; Thomas R McCarty; Wanderley Marques Bernardo; Sergio Carlos Nahas; Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-08-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.