Literature DB >> 23357561

Enhancing cancer screening in primary care: rationale, design, analysis plan, and recruitment results.

David M Murray1, Mira L Katz, Doug M Post, Michael L Pennell, Gregory S Young, Cathy M Tatum, Electra D Paskett.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading type of cancer and the third leading cause of cancer death in the United States. National policy-making organizations recognize and support a variety of CRC screening strategies among average-risk adults aged 50 and older based on strong evidence showing that screening decreases mortality from CRC and can also reduce the incidence of the disease. The goal of this study was to test a multi-level stepped intervention to increase CRC screening rates. We used a group-randomized trial design where the units of assignment were clinics and the units of observation were eligible patients receiving care at those clinics, with stratified random assignment of clinics to study conditions. The primary analysis was planned as a mixed-model logistic regression to account for the expected positive intraclass correlation associated with clinics. Our recruitment experience reflected the difficulties of conducting research in the real world where changes in economic conditions, staff turnover/layoff, inadequate medical records, and poor acceptance of research can significantly impact study plans. It demonstrated the problems that can emerge when procedures used in the study depart from those used in the pilot work to generate parameter estimates for power analysis. It also demonstrated the importance of allowing for attrition at the group and patient levels so that if recruitment falls short, it is possible to maintain adequate power with only a slight increase in the detectable difference. This experience should assist others planning group-randomized trials, whether in cancer screening or in other areas. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23357561      PMCID: PMC3601898          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  26 in total

1.  Measures for ascertaining use of colorectal cancer screening in behavioral, health services, and epidemiologic research.

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Helen Meissner; Carrie Klabunde; Barbara K Rimer; Dennis J Ahnen; Roshan Bastani; Margaret T Mandelson; Marion R Nadel; Sherri Sheinfeld-Gorin; Jane Zapka
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model.

Authors:  I M Rosenstock; V J Strecher; M H Becker
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1988

3.  The periodic health examination and internal medicine: 1984.

Authors:  S W Fletcher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Random-effects models for serial observations with binary response.

Authors:  R Stiratelli; N Laird; J H Ware
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Linear regression analysis with repeated measurements.

Authors:  A Donner
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1984

6.  A regression approach to the analysis of data arising from cluster randomization.

Authors:  A Donner
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Randomization by group: a formal analysis.

Authors:  J Cornfield
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data.

Authors:  N M Laird; J H Ware
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Quantifying the impact of fixed effects modeling of clusters in multiple imputation for cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Rebecca R Andridge
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.207

10.  A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J V Selby; G D Friedman; C P Quesenberry; N S Weiss
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-03-05       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  6 in total

1.  Implementation successes and challenges in participating in a pragmatic study to improve colon cancer screening: perspectives of health center leaders.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Jennifer L Schneider; Amanda Petrik; Jennifer Rivelli; Stephen Taplin; Beverly B Green
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Assessing Colorectal Cancer Screening Barriers by Two Methods.

Authors:  Mira L Katz; Gregory S Young; Barret J Zimmermann; Cathy M Tatum; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Mother-Daughter Dyad Recruitment and Cancer Intervention Challenges in an African American Sample.

Authors:  Maghboeba Mosavel; Katie Ports; Ellyn Leighton-Herrmann
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2014-06-01

4.  Recruiting community health centers into pragmatic research: Findings from STOP CRC.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Sally Retecki; Jennifer Schneider; Stephen H Taplin; Tim Burdick; Beverly B Green
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Testing Interventions to Motivate and Educate (TIME): A multi-level intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Jessica L Krok-Schoen; Gregory S Young; Michael L Pennell; Paul L Reiter; Mira L Katz; Douglas M Post; Cathy M Tatum; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2015-01-01

6.  Malaria prevalence metrics in low- and middle-income countries: an assessment of precision in nationally-representative surveys.

Authors:  Victor A Alegana; Jim Wright; Claudio Bosco; Emelda A Okiro; Peter M Atkinson; Robert W Snow; Andrew J Tatem; Abdisalan M Noor
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.979

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.