Literature DB >> 23357340

Technology-driven and evidence-based genomic analysis for integrated pediatric and prenatal genetics evaluation.

Yuan Wei1, Fang Xu, Peining Li.   

Abstract

The first decade since the completion of the Human Genome Project has been marked with rapid development of genomic technologies and their immediate clinical applications. Genomic analysis using oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) or single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chips has been applied to pediatric patients with developmental and intellectual disabilities (DD/ID), multiple congenital anomalies (MCA) and autistic spectrum disorders (ASD). Evaluation of analytical and clinical validities of aCGH showed > 99% sensitivity and specificity and increased analytical resolution by higher density probe coverage. Reviews of case series, multi-center comparison and large patient-control studies demonstrated a diagnostic yield of 12%-20%; approximately 60% of these abnormalities were recurrent genomic disorders. This pediatric experience has been extended toward prenatal diagnosis. A series of reports indicated approximately 10% of pregnancies with ultrasound-detected structural anomalies and normal cytogenetic findings had genomic abnormalities, and 30% of these abnormalities were syndromic genomic disorders. Evidence-based practice guidelines and standards for implementing genomic analysis and web-delivered knowledge resources for interpreting genomic findings have been established. The progress from this technology-driven and evidence-based genomic analysis provides not only opportunities to dissect disease-causing mechanisms and develop rational therapeutic interventions but also important lessons for integrating genomic sequencing into pediatric and prenatal genetic evaluation.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23357340     DOI: 10.1016/j.jgg.2012.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Genomics        ISSN: 1673-8527            Impact factor:   4.275


  11 in total

Review 1.  Prioritizing therapeutic targets using patient-derived xenograft models.

Authors:  K A Lodhia; A M Hadley; P Haluska; C L Scott
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-03-14

Review 2.  Prioritizing genomic applications for action by level of evidence: a horizon-scanning method.

Authors:  W D Dotson; M P Douglas; K Kolor; A C Stewart; M S Bowen; M Gwinn; A Wulf; H M Anders; C Q Chang; M Clyne; T K Lam; S D Schully; M Marrone; W G Feero; M J Khoury
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  An economic analysis of prenatal cytogenetic technologies for sonographically detected fetal anomalies.

Authors:  Lorie M Harper; Amelia L M Sutton; Ryan E Longman; Anthony O Odibo
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 2.802

4.  Changes in and Efficacies of Indications for Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis of Cytogenomic Abnormalities: 13 Years of Experience in a Single Center.

Authors:  Jinlai Meng; Chelsea Matarese; Julianna Crivello; Katherine Wilcox; Dongmei Wang; Autumn DiAdamo; Fang Xu; Peining Li
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-07-05

5.  Cytogenomic mapping and bioinformatic mining reveal interacting brain expressed genes for intellectual disability.

Authors:  Fang Xu; Lun Li; Vincent P Schulz; Patrick G Gallagher; Bixia Xiang; Hongyu Zhao; Peining Li
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Performance of chromosomal microarray for patients with intellectual disabilities/developmental delay, autism, and multiple congenital anomalies in a Chinese cohort.

Authors:  Wilson Wai Sing Chong; Ivan Fai Man Lo; Stephen Tak Sum Lam; Chi Chiu Wang; Ho Ming Luk; Tak Yeung Leung; Kwong Wai Choy
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and array comparative genomic hybridization analyses for prenatal diagnosis of cytogenomic abnormalities.

Authors:  Zhiyong Xu; Qian Geng; Fuwei Luo; Fang Xu; Peining Li; Jiansheng Xie
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 8.  Human ring chromosome registry for cases in the Chinese population: re-emphasizing Cytogenomic and clinical heterogeneity and reviewing diagnostic and treatment strategies.

Authors:  Qiping Hu; Hongyan Chai; Wei Shu; Peining Li
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.009

9.  Analytical validation and chromosomal distribution of regions of homozygosity by oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization from normal prenatal and postnatal case series.

Authors:  Jiadi Wen; Kathleen Comerford; Zhiyong Xu; Weiqing Wu; Katherine Amato; Brittany Grommisch; Autumn DiAdamo; Fang Xu; Hongyan Chai; Peining Li
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 10.  Fluorescence In situ Hybridization: Cell-Based Genetic Diagnostic and Research Applications.

Authors:  Chenghua Cui; Wei Shu; Peining Li
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2016-09-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.