BACKGROUND: Local hemodynamic factors, particularly low endothelial shear stress (ESS), play a role in the focal formation of atherosclerosis. We used in vivo MRI to investigate the role of the magnitude of ESS on vascular remodeling, plaque burden, and disruption using a rabbit model of controlled atherothrombosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Atherosclerosis was induced in New Zealand white rabbits by cholesterol diet and endothelial denudation. MRI was performed before (pretrigger) and after (posttrigger) inducing plaque disruption with Russell viper venom and histamine. Of the 134 vascular segments studied, 28 contained thrombus (disrupted) and 106 did not (nondisrupted). Disrupted plaques were histologically characterized by a thin, inflamed fibrous cap, a dense lipid core, and mural thrombus. Pretriggered MRI revealed that disrupted plaques clustered at regions with low mean ESS (11.55±5.3 versus 20.9±9.74 dynes/cm(2); P<0.001) and low peak ESS (21.5±11.2 versus 49.2±21.5 dynes/cm(2); P<0.001) compared with nondisrupted plaques. The peak ESS negatively correlated with the plaque area (r=-0.56, P<0.001) and remodeling ratio (r=-0.4, P=0.008). There was also a negative correlation between the mean ESS and the remodeling ratio (r=-0.55, P<0.001). Both the peak ESS and the mean ESS did not correlate with the % stenosis; there was a weak but statistically significant correlation with the % cross-sectional narrowing (r=0.3, P=0.002 and r=0.2, P=0.04, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that both mean (AUC=0.78; 95% CI, 0.69-0.87) and peak ESS (AUC=0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93) identified disrupted plaques. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that low ESS is associated with plaque burden, positive vascular remodeling, and plaque disruption in a rabbit model. Assessment of ESS by noninvasive MRI might be useful for assessing atherosclerotic risk.
BACKGROUND: Local hemodynamic factors, particularly low endothelial shear stress (ESS), play a role in the focal formation of atherosclerosis. We used in vivo MRI to investigate the role of the magnitude of ESS on vascular remodeling, plaque burden, and disruption using a rabbit model of controlled atherothrombosis. METHODS AND RESULTS:Atherosclerosis was induced in New Zealand white rabbits by cholesterol diet and endothelial denudation. MRI was performed before (pretrigger) and after (posttrigger) inducing plaque disruption with Russell viper venom and histamine. Of the 134 vascular segments studied, 28 contained thrombus (disrupted) and 106 did not (nondisrupted). Disrupted plaques were histologically characterized by a thin, inflamed fibrous cap, a dense lipid core, and mural thrombus. Pretriggered MRI revealed that disrupted plaques clustered at regions with low mean ESS (11.55±5.3 versus 20.9±9.74 dynes/cm(2); P<0.001) and low peak ESS (21.5±11.2 versus 49.2±21.5 dynes/cm(2); P<0.001) compared with nondisrupted plaques. The peak ESS negatively correlated with the plaque area (r=-0.56, P<0.001) and remodeling ratio (r=-0.4, P=0.008). There was also a negative correlation between the mean ESS and the remodeling ratio (r=-0.55, P<0.001). Both the peak ESS and the mean ESS did not correlate with the % stenosis; there was a weak but statistically significant correlation with the % cross-sectional narrowing (r=0.3, P=0.002 and r=0.2, P=0.04, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that both mean (AUC=0.78; 95% CI, 0.69-0.87) and peak ESS (AUC=0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93) identified disrupted plaques. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that low ESS is associated with plaque burden, positive vascular remodeling, and plaque disruption in a rabbit model. Assessment of ESS by noninvasive MRI might be useful for assessing atherosclerotic risk.
Authors: Nicolas Baeyens; Chirosree Bandyopadhyay; Brian G Coon; Sanguk Yun; Martin A Schwartz Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Marina Zaromytidou; Antonios P Antoniadis; Gerasimos Siasos; Ahmet Umit Coskun; Ioannis Andreou; Michail I Papafaklis; Michelle Lucier; Charles L Feldman; Peter H Stone Journal: Curr Atheroscler Rep Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 5.113
Authors: Gitsios Gitsioudis; Yiannis S Chatzizisis; Peter Wolf; Anna Missiou; Antonios P Antoniadis; Dimitrios Mitsouras; Sönke Bartling; Zeynep Arica; Matthias Stuber; Frank J Rybicki; Max Nunninger; Christian Erbel; Peter Libby; George D Giannoglou; Hugo A Katus; Grigorios Korosoglou Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-03-24 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Tao Wan; Anant Madabhushi; Alkystis Phinikaridou; James A Hamilton; Ning Hua; Tuan Pham; Jovanna Danagoulian; Ross Kleiman; Andrew J Buckler Journal: Med Phys Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Adam J Brown; Zhongzhao Teng; Paul C Evans; Jonathan H Gillard; Habib Samady; Martin R Bennett Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2016-01-29 Impact factor: 32.419