Literature DB >> 23357079

Differential activation of brain regions involved with error-feedback and imitation based motor simulation when observing self and an expert's actions in pilots and non-pilots on a complex glider landing task.

Daniel E Callan1, Cengiz Terzibas, Daniel B Cassel, Akiko Callan, Mitsuo Kawato, Masa-Aki Sato.   

Abstract

In this fMRI study we investigate neural processes related to the action observation network using a complex perceptual-motor task in pilots and non-pilots. The task involved landing a glider (using aileron, elevator, rudder, and dive brake) as close to a target as possible, passively observing a replay of one's own previous trial, passively observing a replay of an expert's trial, and a baseline do nothing condition. The objective of this study is to investigate two types of motor simulation processes used during observation of action: imitation based motor simulation and error-feedback based motor simulation. It has been proposed that the computational neurocircuitry of the cortex is well suited for unsupervised imitation based learning, whereas, the cerebellum is well suited for error-feedback based learning. Consistent with predictions, pilots (to a greater extent than non-pilots) showed significant differential activity when observing an expert landing the glider in brain regions involved with imitation based motor simulation (including premotor cortex PMC, inferior frontal gyrus IFG, anterior insula, parietal cortex, superior temporal gyrus, and middle temporal MT area) than when observing one's own previous trial which showed significant differential activity in the cerebellum (only for pilots) thought to be concerned with error-feedback based motor simulation. While there was some differential brain activity for pilots in regions involved with both Execution and Observation of the flying task (potential Mirror System sites including IFG, PMC, superior parietal lobule) the majority was adjacent to these areas (Observation Only Sites) (predominantly in PMC, IFG, and inferior parietal loblule). These regions showing greater activity for observation than for action may be involved with processes related to motor-based representational transforms that are not necessary when actually carrying out the task.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23357079     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  8 in total

1.  Disruption in neural phase synchrony is related to identification of inattentional deafness in real-world setting.

Authors:  Daniel E Callan; Thibault Gateau; Gautier Durantin; Nicolas Gonthier; Frédéric Dehais
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Structural Differences in Gray Matter between Glider Pilots and Non-Pilots. A Voxel-Based Morphometry Study.

Authors:  Tosif Ahamed; Motoaki Kawanabe; Shin Ishii; Daniel E Callan
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 4.003

3.  Classification of single-trial auditory events using dry-wireless EEG during real and motion simulated flight.

Authors:  Daniel E Callan; Gautier Durantin; Cengiz Terzibas
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-17

4.  Activation of cerebellum and basal ganglia during the observation and execution of manipulative actions.

Authors:  Antonino Errante; Leonardo Fogassi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  I See Your Effort: Force-Related BOLD Effects in an Extended Action Execution-Observation Network Involving the Cerebellum.

Authors:  Letizia Casiraghi; Adnan A S Alahmadi; Anita Monteverdi; Fulvia Palesi; Gloria Castellazzi; Giovanni Savini; Karl Friston; Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott; Egidio D'Angelo
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Altered Default Mode Network Dynamics in Civil Aviation Pilots.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Kaijun Xu; Yong Yang; Quanchuan Wang; Hao Jiang; Xiangmei Guo; Xipeng Chen; Jiazhong Yang; Cheng Luo
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Observing errors in a combination of error and correct models favors observational motor learning.

Authors:  Zhi-Ming Tang; Yutaka Oouchida; Meng-Xin Wang; Zu-Lin Dou; Shin-Ichi Izumi
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.288

8.  The modulation of event-related alpha rhythm during the time course of anticipation.

Authors:  Marie Simonet; Hadj Boumediene Meziane; Oliver Richard Runswick; Jamie Stephen North; Andrew Mark Williams; Jérôme Barral; André Roca
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.