Literature DB >> 23356871

Efficacy of intratympanic steroid therapy for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: comparison with systemic steroid therapy and combined therapy.

Seong-Cheon Bae1, He-Il Noh, Beom-Cho Jun, Eun-Ju Jeon, Jae-Hyun Seo, So-Young Park, Jun-Kyu Kim, Dong-Hee Lee, Jeong-Hoon Oh, Shi-Nae Park, Sang-Won Yeo.   

Abstract

CONCLUSION: Intratympanic steroid therapy (IT-S) was as effective as systemic steroid therapy (SST) or combined therapy (CT) and could be considered a first-line therapeutic modality for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). Due to its known safety and efficacy, IT-S will be particularly suitable for patients with SSNHL who have chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or chronic renal failure.
OBJECTIVES: Systemic high dose steroid therapy is the main therapeutic modality for SSNHL. Comparable therapeutic efficacies for IT-S and CT with SST and IT-S for SSNHL have been reported recently. We compared the efficacy of IT-S, SST, and CT for treating SSNHL.
METHODS: A retrospective, multicenter study investigating the therapeutic efficacy of SST, IT-S, and CT for SSNHL was designed and involved 735 patients with idiopathic SSNHL who were diagnosed and treated at seven tertiary referral medical centers of the Catholic University of Korea between 2007 and 2011. Patients were divided into three groups according to the treatment methods they received: IT-S group, SST group, and CT group (SS plus IT-S). Hearing was evaluated by pure tone audiogram performed before initial treatment and at 4 weeks following the final treatment. More than a 10 dB HL decrease in average air conduction threshold of hearing at 500, 1000, 2000, and 3000 Hz was defined as improved hearing.
RESULTS: Among 735 patients with SSNHL, 94 were included in the IT-S group, 444 in the SST, and 197 in the CT group. Age, gender, interval from disease onset to start of treatment, and initial hearing level were not different among the three groups. Patients who had concomitant medical disorders such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or chronic renal failure were more frequently treated with IT-S. No difference in the level of hearing gain or ratio of hearing improvement was observed among the three groups (p = 0.147 and p = 0.067, respectively).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23356871     DOI: 10.3109/00016489.2012.749520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  5 in total

1.  Hearing Changes After Intratympanically Applied Steroids for Primary Therapy of Sudden Hearing Loss: A Meta-analysis Using Mathematical Simulations of Drug Delivery Protocols.

Authors:  Arne Liebau; Olivia Pogorzelski; Alec N Salt; Stefan K Plontke
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Systemic, intratympanic and combined administration of steroids for sudden hearing loss. A prospective randomized multicenter trial.

Authors:  Michael Tsounis; George Psillas; Miltiadis Tsalighopoulos; Victor Vital; Nicolas Maroudias; Konstantinos Markou
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Combination of Pulse Steroid with Intratympanic Injections in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Maryam Amizadeh; Keramat Mozafarnia; Javad Moslemikia; Ahmad Naghibzadeh-Tahami
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-01

4.  Systemic effects of intratympanic dexamethasone therapy.

Authors:  Eva Novoa; Marcel Gärtner; Christoph Henzen
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.335

Review 5.  Intratympanic corticosteroid for sudden hearing loss: does it really work?

Authors:  Monique Antunes de Souza Chelminski Barreto; Aleluia Lima Losno Ledesma; Carlos Augusto Costa Pires de Oliveira; Fayez Bahmad
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-11-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.