OBJECTIVE: The ε4 allele of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype is the most widely accepted genetic risk factor for Alzheimer's dementia (AD), but findings on whether it is a risk factor for the AD prodrome, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), have been inconsistent. In a prospective longitudinal design, we investigated (a) whether transitions to MCI and other forms of neurocognitive impairment without dementia (CIND) are more frequent among normal ε4 carriers than among noncarriers and (b) whether subsequent transitions to AD from MCI and from other forms of CIND are more frequent among ε4 carriers than among noncarriers. METHOD: The frequency of the ε4 allele was studied in older adults (mean age > 70), who had participated in two or more waves of neuropsychological testing and diagnosis in the Aging, Demographics, and Memory Study (ADAMS) of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging's Health and Retirement Study, conducted by the University of Michigan. The association between ε4 and longitudinal transitions to specific types of CIND and dementia can be determined with this data set. RESULTS: Epsilon 4 increased the rate of progression from normal functioning to MCI (58% of new diagnoses were carriers) but not to other forms of CIND. The rate of progression to AD from MCI or from other forms of CIND was not increased by ε4. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the hypothesis that ε4 is a risk factor for transitions from normal functioning to MCI but not for subsequent transitions to AD. In the ADAMS sample, the reason ε4 is elevated in AD individuals is because it is already elevated in MCI individuals, who are the primary source of new AD diagnoses.
OBJECTIVE: The ε4 allele of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype is the most widely accepted genetic risk factor for Alzheimer's dementia (AD), but findings on whether it is a risk factor for the AD prodrome, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), have been inconsistent. In a prospective longitudinal design, we investigated (a) whether transitions to MCI and other forms of neurocognitive impairment without dementia (CIND) are more frequent among normal ε4 carriers than among noncarriers and (b) whether subsequent transitions to AD from MCI and from other forms of CIND are more frequent among ε4 carriers than among noncarriers. METHOD: The frequency of the ε4 allele was studied in older adults (mean age > 70), who had participated in two or more waves of neuropsychological testing and diagnosis in the Aging, Demographics, and Memory Study (ADAMS) of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging's Health and Retirement Study, conducted by the University of Michigan. The association between ε4 and longitudinal transitions to specific types of CIND and dementia can be determined with this data set. RESULTS: Epsilon 4 increased the rate of progression from normal functioning to MCI (58% of new diagnoses were carriers) but not to other forms of CIND. The rate of progression to AD from MCI or from other forms of CIND was not increased by ε4. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the hypothesis that ε4 is a risk factor for transitions from normal functioning to MCI but not for subsequent transitions to AD. In the ADAMS sample, the reason ε4 is elevated in AD individuals is because it is already elevated in MCI individuals, who are the primary source of new AD diagnoses.
Authors: Brenda L Plassman; Kenneth M Langa; Ryan J McCammon; Gwenith G Fisher; Guy G Potter; James R Burke; David C Steffens; Norman L Foster; Bruno Giordani; Frederick W Unverzagt; Kathleen A Welsh-Bohmer; Steven G Heeringa; David R Weir; Robert B Wallace Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2011-03-18 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Charles J Brainerd; Valerie F Reyna; Ronald C Petersen; Glenn E Smith; Emily S Taub Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: D Bartrés-Faz; I C Clemente; C Junqué; N Valveny; A López-Alomar; J Sánchez-Aldeguer; A López-Guillén; P Moral Journal: Neurogenetics Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 2.660
Authors: P Zill; R Engel; H Hampel; S Behrens; K Bürger; F Padberg; S Stübner; H J Möller; M Ackenheil; B Bondy Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2001 Impact factor: 5.270
Authors: Correne A DeCarlo; Holly A Tuokko; Dorothy Williams; Roger A Dixon; Stuart W S MacDonald Journal: Ageing Res Rev Date: 2014-09-30 Impact factor: 10.895
Authors: Scott C Neu; Judy Pa; Walter Kukull; Duane Beekly; Amanda Kuzma; Prabhakaran Gangadharan; Li-San Wang; Klaus Romero; Stephen P Arneric; Alberto Redolfi; Daniele Orlandi; Giovanni B Frisoni; Rhoda Au; Sherral Devine; Sanford Auerbach; Ana Espinosa; Mercè Boada; Agustín Ruiz; Sterling C Johnson; Rebecca Koscik; Jiun-Jie Wang; Wen-Chuin Hsu; Yao-Liang Chen; Arthur W Toga Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Corinne Pettigrew; Anja Soldan; Shanshan Li; Yi Lu; Mei-Cheng Wang; Ola A Selnes; Abhay Moghekar; Richard O'Brien; Marilyn Albert Journal: Cogn Neurosci Date: 2013-08-25 Impact factor: 3.065
Authors: Joshua R Ehrlich; Bonnielin K Swenor; Yunshu Zhou; Kenneth M Langa Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2021-11-15 Impact factor: 6.591