Literature DB >> 23355103

Variability of state school-based hearing screening protocols in the United States.

Deepa L Sekhar1, Thomas R Zalewski, Ian M Paul.   

Abstract

The prevalence of hearing loss has increased among United States children. As schools commonly perform hearing screens, we sought to contrast current United States school-based hearing screening protocols. State department of health and education websites were reviewed to assess school hearing screening protocols for the fifty states and the District of Columbia. Individuals listed on these websites were contacted as necessary to confirm and/or acquire relevant data. School-based hearing screening is currently required in 34/51 (67 %) states. Of these 34 states, 28 (82 %) mandate grades for screening, but only 20 (59 %) require screening beyond 6th grade. Pure tone audiometry is the most common screening method (33/34 [97 %]). A majority of states screen at 1, 2 and 4 kHz usually at 20 or 25 dB hearing level. Six states recommend or require testing at 6 or 8 kHz, which is necessary to detect high-frequency hearing loss. The results indicate that United States school-based hearing screens vary significantly. They focus on low frequencies with few testing adolescents for whom high-frequency hearing loss has increased. Disparities in hearing loss detection are likely, particularly considering the evolution of hazardous noise exposures and rising prevalence of hearing loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23355103     DOI: 10.1007/s10900-013-9652-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  12 in total

1.  Estimated prevalence of noise-induced hearing threshold shifts among children 6 to 19 years of age: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994, United States.

Authors:  A S Niskar; S M Kieszak; A E Holmes; E Esteban; C Rubin; D J Brody
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Determining the effect of newborn hearing screening legislation: an analysis of state hearing screening rates.

Authors:  Denise R Green; Marcus Gaffney; Owen Devine; Scott D Grosse
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Adolescents and MP3 players: too many risks, too few precautions.

Authors:  Ineke Vogel; Hans Verschuure; Catharina P B van der Ploeg; Johannes Brug; Hein Raat
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Strategies for the prevention of MP3-induced hearing loss among adolescents: expert opinions from a Delphi study.

Authors:  Ineke Vogel; Johannes Brug; Catharina P B van der Ploeg; Hein Raat
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 5.  Impact of occupational hearing loss on the lives of workers.

Authors:  R Hétu; L Getty; H T Quoc
Journal:  Occup Med       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug

6.  Prevalence of hearing loss among children 6 to 19 years of age: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  A S Niskar; S M Kieszak; A Holmes; E Esteban; C Rubin; D J Brody
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-04-08       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Prevalence of obesity and trends in body mass index among US children and adolescents, 1999-2010.

Authors:  Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Brian K Kit; Katherine M Flegal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Change in prevalence of hearing loss in US adolescents.

Authors:  Josef Shargorodsky; Sharon G Curhan; Gary C Curhan; Roland Eavey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Hearing assessment in infants and children: recommendations beyond neonatal screening.

Authors:  Allen D Buz Harlor; Charles Bower
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Noise-induced hearing loss in children: A 'less than silent' environmental danger.

Authors:  Robert V Harrison
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.253

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Disparities in access to pediatric hearing health care.

Authors:  Matthew L Bush; Michael R Kaufman; Beth N McNulty
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.064

2.  Prevalence of hearing impairment amongst school going children in the rural field practice area of the institution.

Authors:  Saurabh Kumar; Anita Aramani; Minton Mathew; Mahesh Bhat; Vinay V Rao
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-04-15

3.  Validation Study of Kids Hearing Game: A Self-Administered Pediatric Audiology Application.

Authors:  Brian Kung; Larisa Kunda; Sarah Groff; Erica Miele; Marion Loyd; Diane M Carpenter
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2021-05

Review 4.  How the World's Children Hear: A Narrative Review of School Hearing Screening Programs Globally.

Authors:  Michael Yong; Neelima Panth; Catherine M McMahon; Peter R Thorne; Susan D Emmett
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2020-05-19

5.  A Prevalence Study of Hearing Loss among Primary School Children in the South East of Iran.

Authors:  Aqeel Absalan; Ibrahim Pirasteh; Gholam Ali Dashti Khavidaki; Azam Asemi Rad; Ali Akbar Nasr Esfahani; Mohammad Hussein Nilforoush
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-07-01

6.  Missed opportunities: Do states require screening of children for health conditions that interfere with learning?

Authors:  Delaney Gracy; Anupa Fabian; Corey Hannah Basch; Maria Scigliano; Sarah A MacLean; Rachel K MacKenzie; Irwin E Redlener
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Hearing loss in Korean adolescents: The prevalence thereof and its association with leisure noise exposure.

Authors:  Jihye Rhee; Dongwook Lee; Hyun Jung Lim; Moo Kyun Park; Myung Whan Suh; Jun Ho Lee; Yun-Chul Hong; Seung-Ha Oh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.