Literature DB >> 23354915

Nearly a third of abnormalities found after first-trimester screening are different than expected: 10-year experience from a single center.

Christina M L Alamillo1, David Krantz, Mark Evans, Morris Fiddler, Eugene Pergament.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of first-trimester aneuploidy screening in a single clinical setting.
METHODS: Maternal age, nuchal translucency, and maternal serum levels of pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and free beta human chorionic gonadotrophin comprised first-trimester risk assessment for Down syndrome and trisomies 13/18. Means, screen positive rates, detection rates, and predictive values were calculated for Down syndrome and trisomies 13/18.
RESULTS: Of the 23 329 first-trimester screenings, 6.3% were screen positive: 5.7% for Down syndrome only, 0.4% for trisomies 13/18 only, and 0.3% for Down syndrome and trisomies 13/18. An abnormal karyotype was present in 3.9% of screen positives for Down syndrome, 13.8% of screen positives for trisomies 13/18, and 45.9% of screen positives for both Down syndrome and trisomies 13/18. Of the 97 pregnancies found to have an abnormal karyotype, 29.9% had chromosome abnormalities other than trisomy 13, 18, or 21, with expected clinical outcomes ranging from likely benign to uniformly lethal.
CONCLUSION: As expected, first-trimester screening is effective for detecting aneuploidy for chromosomes 13, 18, and 21; however, a significant number of chromosomally abnormal pregnancies initially identified by first-trimester screening have a different karyotype. With the possible exception of 47,XYY and 45,X, the dataset suggested that these different chromosome complements were likely to be randomly distributed. Nevertheless, prior to diagnostic testing, prospective parents should be counseled concerning the possibility of a chromosome abnormality other than the trisomies 13, 18, or 21.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23354915     DOI: 10.1002/pd.4054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  10 in total

1.  The utility of nuchal translucency ultrasound in identifying rare chromosomal abnormalities not detectable by cell-free DNA screening.

Authors:  Victoria K Berger; Mary E Norton; Teresa N Sparks; Monica Flessel; Rebecca J Baer; Robert J Currier
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Lower detectability of non-invasive prenatal testing compared to prenatal diagnosis in high-risk pregnant women.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Zhi-Wei Wang; Qin Zhou; Bin Zhang; Ting Yin; Bin Yu; Lei-Lei Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-07

3.  Variation of ultrasound findings in the first trimester examination of recurrent cases with trisomy 21.

Authors:  Aggelos Daniilidis; Dimitrios Balaouras; Dimitrios Chitzios; Georgios Balaouras; Mihai Capilna; Efstratios Asimakopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2015-04-08

Review 4.  Recent advances in prenatal genetic screening and testing.

Authors:  Ignatia B Van den Veyver
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-10-28

5.  Expanded conventional first trimester screening.

Authors:  Jonathan B Carmichael; Hsiao-Pin Liu; David Janik; Terrence W Hallahan; Kypros H Nicolaides; David A Krantz
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  The Use of Ultrasound as a Potential Adjunct to Cell-Free Fetal DNA Screening for Aneuploidy at Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA.

Authors:  Jessica Scholl; Stephen Chasen
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2018-02-09

7.  A contingent model for cell-free DNA testing to detect fetal aneuploidy after first trimester combined screening.

Authors:  Carmen Cotarelo-Pérez; Raluca Oancea-Ionescu; Eloy Asenjo-de-la-Fuente; Dolores Ortega-de-Heredia; Patricia Soler-Ruiz; Pluvio Coronado-Martín; María Fenollar-Cortés
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2019-01-15

8.  A Retrospective Analysis of 10-Year Data Assessed the Diagnostic Accuracy and Efficacy of Cytogenomic Abnormalities in Current Prenatal and Pediatric Settings.

Authors:  Hongyan Chai; Autumn DiAdamo; Brittany Grommisch; Fang Xu; Qinghua Zhou; Jiadi Wen; Maurice Mahoney; Allen Bale; James McGrath; Michele Spencer-Manzon; Peining Li; Hui Zhang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 9.  Beyond Trisomy 21: Additional Chromosomal Anomalies Detected through Routine Aneuploidy Screening.

Authors:  Amy Metcalfe; Catriona Hippman; Melanie Pastuck; Jo-Ann Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Fetal diagnostic indications for second and third trimester outpatient pregnancy termination.

Authors:  Warren M Hern
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.050

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.