BACKGROUND: Recurrent glioblastoma after initial radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide is problematic. Here, patients with temozolomide-refractory high-grade gliomas were treated with bevacizumab (BV) and evaluated using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for response. METHODS: Nine post-temozolomide recurrent or progressive high-grade glioma patients (seven with glioblastoma and two with anaplastic astrocytoma) were treated with BV monotherapy. Average age was 57 years (range, 22-78), median Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) was 70 (30-80) and median BV line number was 2 (2-5). Two had additional stereotactic radiotherapy within 6 months prior to BV. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging after BV therapy was performed within 2 weeks with calculation of mean ADC (mADC) values of enhancing tumor contours. RESULTS: Post-BV treatment MR imaging showed decreased tumor volumes in eight of nine cases (88.9 %). Partial response was obtained in four cases (44.4 %), four cases had stable disease, and one had progressive disease. Of 15 evaluable enhancing lesions, 11 shrank and four did not. Pretreatment mADC values were above 1100 (10(-6) mm(2)/s) in all responding tumors, while all non-responding lesions scored below 1100 (p = 0.001). mADC decreased after the first BV treatment in all lesions except one. KPS improved in four cases (44.4 %). Median progression-free survival and overall survival for those having all lesions with high mADC (>1100) were significantly longer than those with a low mADC (<1100) lesion (p = 0.018 and 0.046, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab monotherapy is effective in patients with temozolomide-refractory recurrent gliomas and tumor mean ADC value can be a useful marker for prediction of BV response and survival.
BACKGROUND: Recurrent glioblastoma after initial radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide is problematic. Here, patients with temozolomide-refractory high-grade gliomas were treated with bevacizumab (BV) and evaluated using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for response. METHODS: Nine post-temozolomide recurrent or progressive high-grade gliomapatients (seven with glioblastoma and two with anaplastic astrocytoma) were treated with BV monotherapy. Average age was 57 years (range, 22-78), median Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) was 70 (30-80) and median BV line number was 2 (2-5). Two had additional stereotactic radiotherapy within 6 months prior to BV. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging after BV therapy was performed within 2 weeks with calculation of mean ADC (mADC) values of enhancing tumor contours. RESULTS: Post-BV treatment MR imaging showed decreased tumor volumes in eight of nine cases (88.9 %). Partial response was obtained in four cases (44.4 %), four cases had stable disease, and one had progressive disease. Of 15 evaluable enhancing lesions, 11 shrank and four did not. Pretreatment mADC values were above 1100 (10(-6) mm(2)/s) in all responding tumors, while all non-responding lesions scored below 1100 (p = 0.001). mADC decreased after the first BV treatment in all lesions except one. KPS improved in four cases (44.4 %). Median progression-free survival and overall survival for those having all lesions with high mADC (>1100) were significantly longer than those with a low mADC (<1100) lesion (p = 0.018 and 0.046, respectively). CONCLUSIONS:Bevacizumab monotherapy is effective in patients with temozolomide-refractory recurrent gliomas and tumor mean ADC value can be a useful marker for prediction of BV response and survival.
Authors: T Sugahara; Y Korogi; M Kochi; I Ikushima; Y Shigematu; T Hirai; T Okuda; L Liang; Y Ge; Y Komohara; Y Ushio; M Takahashi Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Whitney B Pope; Hyun J Kim; Jing Huo; Jeffry Alger; Matthew S Brown; David Gjertson; Victor Sai; Jonathan R Young; Leena Tekchandani; Timothy Cloughesy; Paul S Mischel; Albert Lai; Phioanh Nghiemphu; Syed Rahmanuddin; Jonathan Goldin Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: W B Pope; A Lai; R Mehta; H J Kim; J Qiao; J R Young; X Xue; J Goldin; M S Brown; P L Nghiemphu; A Tran; T F Cloughesy Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-02-17 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Joonmi Oh; Roland G Henry; Andrea Pirzkall; Ying Lu; Xiaojuan Li; Isabelle Catalaa; Susan Chang; William P Dillon; Sarah J Nelson Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Teri N Kreisl; Lyndon Kim; Kraig Moore; Paul Duic; Cheryl Royce; Irene Stroud; Nancy Garren; Megan Mackey; John A Butman; Kevin Camphausen; John Park; Paul S Albert; Howard A Fine Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-12-29 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lei Qin; Xiang Li; Amanda Stroiney; Jinrong Qu; Jeffrey Helgager; David A Reardon; Geoffrey S Young Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Thomas L Chenevert; Dariya I Malyarenko; Craig J Galbán; Diana M Gomez-Hassan; Pia C Sundgren; Christina I Tsien; Brian D Ross Journal: Tomography Date: 2019-03