| Literature DB >> 23354480 |
Daniel P Cardinali1, Pablo A Scacchi Bernasconi, Roxana Reynoso, Carlos F Reyes Toso, Pablo Scacchi.
Abstract
To examine the effect of melatonin given to rats simultaneously with fructose on initial and fully developed metabolic syndrome, male Wistar rats had free access to chow and 5% or 10% fructose drinking solution for 8 weeks. As compared to controls, systolic blood pressure augmented significantly under both treatments whereas excessive body weight was seen in rats receiving the 10% fructose only. Rats drinking 5% fructose showed a greater tolerance to a glucose load while rats having access to a 10% fructose drinking solution exhibited the expected impaired glucose tolerance found in the metabolic syndrome. Circulating triglyceride and low density lipoproteins-cholesterol (LDL-c) concentration augmented significantly in rats showing a fully developed metabolic syndrome only, while high blood cholesterol levels were found at both stages examined. Melatonin (25 μg/mL drinking solution) counteracted the changes in body weight and systolic blood pressure found in rats administered with fructose. Melatonin decreased the abnormal hyperglycemia seen after a glucose load in 10% fructose-treated rats but it did not modify the greater tolerance to glucose observed in animals drinking 5% fructose. Melatonin also counteracted the changes in plasma LDL-c, triglyceride and cholesterol levels and decreased plasma uric acid levels. The results underline a possible therapeutical role of melatonin in the metabolic syndrome, both at initial and established phases.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23354480 PMCID: PMC3587998 DOI: 10.3390/ijms14022502
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Body weight, systolic BP and plasma levels of several analytes in rats receiving a 5% or a 10% fructose overload for 8 weeks.
| Control | 5% Fructose | 10% Fructose | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial body weight (g) | 273 ± 15 | 267 ± 9 | 269 ± 11 | 0.07 | NS |
| Final body weight (g) | 354 ± 13 | 339 ± 11 | 409 ± 19 | 6.26 | 0.007 |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 108 ± 4 | 124 ± 5 * | 129 ± 5 * | 5.47 | 0.012 |
| LDL-c (mg/dL) | 37 ± 5 | 45 ± 4 | 54 ± 4 * | 3.81 | 0.039 |
| HDL-c (mg/dL) | 53 ± 2 | 52 ± 1 | 54 ± 4 | 0.14 | NS |
| Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 68 ± 4 | 84 ± 4 * | 88 ± 6 * | 4.94 | 0.017 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 95 ± 6 | 112 ± 11 | 233 ± 19 * | 32.8 | <0.001 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.11 | NS |
| Urea (mg/dL) | 44 ± 5 | 49 ± 6 | 39 ± 3 | 0.35 | NS |
| Uric acid (mg/dL) | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 1.6 ± 0.3 | 0.18 | NS |
Shown are the means ± SEM (n = 8 per group). F values in ANOVA and the corresponding p are quoted. NS: not significant. Asterisks designate the existence of significant differences vs. control in a one-way ANOVA followed by a Dunnett’s t test.
Figure 1Glucose tolerance test in rats that had free access to chow and a drinking solution containing 5% fructose (upper panel) or 10% fructose (lower panel) for 8 weeks. Controls received tap water. Glucose (2 g/kg body weight) was administered i.p. Shown are the means ± SEM (n = 8 per group). Letters indicate the existence of significant differences vs. control (Student’s t test) ap < 0.01, bp < 0.03. For further statistical analysis see text.
Figure 2Body weight, systolic BP and glycemia after the administration of glucose (2 g/kg body weight i.p.) to rats that had free access to chow and drinking solutions containing 0.015% ethanol (control), 0.015% ethanol plus 5% fructose, 5% fructose plus 25 μg/mL melatonin or 25 μg/mL of melatonin for 8 weeks. Controls received tap water. Shown are the means ± SEM (n = 8 per group). Letters indicate the existence of significant differences between the experimental groups after a one-way ANOVA followed by a post-hoc Bonferroni’s test, ap < 0.02 vs. the remaining groups, bp < 0.02 vs. rats drinking 5% fructose.
Figure 3Plasma levels of LDL-c, HDL-c, cholesterol, triglycerides, creatinine, urea and uric acid in rats that had free access to chow and drinking solutions containing 0.015% ethanol (control), 0.015% ethanol plus 5% fructose, 5% fructose plus 25 μg/mL of melatonin or 25 μg/mL of melatonin for 8 weeks. Controls received tap water. Shown are the means ± SEM (n = 8 per group). Letters indicate the existence of significant differences between the experimental groups after a one-way ANOVA followed by a post-hoc Bonferroni’s test, ap < 0.01 vs. control; bp < 0.05 vs. control; cp < 0.02 vs. the remaining groups; dp < 0.04 vs. melatonin-treated rats. For further statistical analysis, see text.
Effect of melatonin on body weight, systolic BP and plasma levels of several analytes in rats with a fully developed metabolic syndrome (10% fructose drinking solution for 8 weeks).
| Control | 10% Fructose | 10% Fructose + Melatonin | Melatonin | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial body weight (g) | 265 ± 22 | 284 ± 19 | 273 ± 16 | 269 ± 26 | 0.15 | NS |
| Final body weight (g) | 351 ± 30 | 479 ± 36 | 370 ± 32 | 371 ± 30 | 3.29 | 0.035 |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 102 ± 8 | 129 ± 6 | 103 ± 4 | 100 ± 8 | 4.18 | 0.014 |
| LDL-c (mg/dL) | 39 ± 4 | 59 ± 6 | 19 ± 3 | 22 ± 4 | 17.6 | <0.001 |
| HDL-c (mg/dL) | 54 ± 7 | 55 ± 8 | 62 ± 6 | 58 ± 5 | 0.29 | NS |
| Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 65 ± 6 | 88 ± 4 | 67 ± 5 | 71 ± 4 | 4.71 | 0.009 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 175 ± 23 | 302 ± 26 | 215 ± 19 | 164 ± 13 | 9.04 | <0.001 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 0.24 | NS |
| Urea (mg/dL) | 44 ± 5 | 40 ± 6 | 38 ± 3 | 42 ± 4 | 0.31 | NS |
| Uric acid (mg/dL) | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 1.9 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 8.52 | <0.001 |
For experimental details see Methods. Shown are the means ± SEM (n = 8 per group). Letters indicate the existence of significant differences between the experimental groups after a one-way ANOVA followed by a post-hoc Bonferroni’s test, as follows:
p < 0.05 vs. control;
p < 0.03 vs. fructose;
p < 0.01 vs. the remaining groups;
p < 0.02 vs. control;
p < 0.02 vs. control and fructose + melatonin groups;
p < 0.01 vs. control and melatonin alone groups;
p < 0.04 vs. fructose;
p < 0.01 vs. fructose + melatonin and melatonin groups. For further statistical analysis, see text.
Figure 4Glucose tolerance test in rats that had free access to chow and drinking solutions containing 0.015% ethanol (control), 0.015% ethanol plus 10% fructose, 10% fructose plus 25 μg/mL of melatonin or 25 μg/mL of melatonin for 8 weeks. Controls received tap water. A glucose solution of 2 g/kg body weight was administered i.p. Shown are the means ± SEM (n = 8 per group). ap < 0.02 vs. the remaining groups, one-way ANOVA, Bonferroni’s test.