Literature DB >> 23353927

An integrated microfluidic cell culture system for high-throughput perfusion three-dimensional cell culture-based assays: effect of cell culture model on the results of chemosensitivity assays.

Song-Bin Huang1, Shih-Siou Wang, Chia-Hsun Hsieh, Yung Chang Lin, Chao-Sung Lai, Min-Hsien Wu.   

Abstract

Although microfluidic cell culture systems are versatile tools for cellular assays, their use has yet to set in motion an evolutionary shift away from conventional cell culture methods. This situation is mainly due to technical hurdles: the operational barriers to the end-users, the lack of compatible detection schemes capable of reading out the results of a microfluidic-based cellular assay, and the lack of fundamental data to bridge the gap between microfluidic and conventional cell culture models. To address these issues, we propose a high-throughput, perfusion, three-dimensional (3-D) microfluidic cell culture system encompassing 30 microbioreactors. This integrated system not only aims to provide a user-friendly cell culture tool for biologists to perform assays but also to enable them to obtain precise data. Its technical features include (i) integration of a heater chip based on transparent indium tin oxide glass, providing stable thermal conditions for cell culturing; (ii) a microscale 3-D culture sample loading scheme that is both efficient and precise; (iii) a non-mechanical pneumatically driven multiplex medium perfusion mechanism; and (iv) a microplate reader-compatible waste medium collector array for the subsequent high throughput bioassays. In this study, we found that the 3-D culture sample loading method provided uniform sample loading [coefficient of variation (CV): 3.2%]. In addition, the multiplex medium perfusion mechanism led to reasonably uniform (CV: 3.6-6.9%) medium pumping rates in the 30 microchannels. Moreover, we used the proposed system to perform a successful cell culture-based chemosensitivity assay. To determine the effects of cell culture models on the cellular proliferation, and the results of chemosensitivity assays, we compared our data with that obtained using three conventional cell culture models. We found that the nature of the cell culture format could lead to different evaluation outcomes. Consequently, when establishing a cell culture model for in vitro cell-based assays, it might be necessary to investigate the fundamental physiological variations of the cultured cells in different culture systems to avoid any misinterpretation of data. As a whole, we have developed an integrated microfluidic cell culture system that overcomes several technical hurdles commonly encountered in the practical application of microfluidic cell culture systems, and we have obtained fundamental information to reconcile differences found with data acquired using conventional methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23353927     DOI: 10.1039/c2lc41264k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Chip        ISSN: 1473-0189            Impact factor:   6.799


  17 in total

Review 1.  Microfluidic devices for cell cultivation and proliferation.

Authors:  Masoomeh Tehranirokh; Abbas Z Kouzani; Paul S Francis; Jagat R Kanwar
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Hydrogel-based microfluidic incubator for microorganism cultivation and analyses.

Authors:  Dietmar Puchberger-Enengl; Sander van den Driesche; Christian Krutzler; Franz Keplinger; Michael J Vellekoop
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.800

3.  Fabrication of a Multiplexed Artificial Cellular MicroEnvironment Array.

Authors:  Yasumasa Mashimo; Momoko Yoshioka; Yumie Tokunaga; Christopher Fockenberg; Shiho Terada; Yoshie Koyama; Teiko Shibata-Seki; Koki Yoshimoto; Risako Sakai; Hayase Hakariya; Li Liu; Toshihiro Akaike; Eiry Kobatake; Siew-Eng How; Motonari Uesugi; Yong Chen; Ken-Ichiro Kamei
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 4.  Microfluidic cell chips for high-throughput drug screening.

Authors:  Chun-Wei Chi; Ah Rezwanuddin Ahmed; Zeynep Dereli-Korkut; Sihong Wang
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 5.  Advances in microfluidic devices made from thermoplastics used in cell biology and analyses.

Authors:  Elif Gencturk; Senol Mutlu; Kutlu O Ulgen
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 2.800

6.  Using reconfigurable microfluidics to study the role of HGF in autocrine and paracrine signaling of hepatocytes.

Authors:  Dipali Patel; Amranul Haque; Yandong Gao; Alexander Revzin
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  Magnetoactive sponges for dynamic control of microfluidic flow patterns in microphysiological systems.

Authors:  Sungmin Hong; Youngmee Jung; Ringo Yen; Hon Fai Chan; Kam W Leong; George A Truskey; Xuanhe Zhao
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 6.799

8.  A microfluidic platform for drug screening in a 3D cancer microenvironment.

Authors:  Hardik J Pandya; Karan Dhingra; Devbalaji Prabhakar; Vineethkrishna Chandrasekar; Siva Kumar Natarajan; Anish S Vasan; Ashish Kulkarni; Hadi Shafiee
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 10.618

9.  Microarray platform affords improved product analysis in mammalian cell growth studies.

Authors:  Payel Datta; Luciana Meli; Lingyun Li; Nicole Migliore; Eugene Schaefer; Susan T Sharfstein; Jonathan S Dordick; Robert J Linhardt
Journal:  Biotechnol J       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 10.  Microfluidics-assisted in vitro drug screening and carrier production.

Authors:  Jonathan H Tsui; Woohyuk Lee; Suzie H Pun; Jungkyu Kim; Deok-Ho Kim
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 15.470

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.