Literature DB >> 23352762

Out-of-hours MRI provision in the UK and models of service delivery.

J Hauptfleisch1, T M Meagher, D King, L López de Heredia, R J Hughes.   

Abstract

AIM: To examine current out-of-hours magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provision through a snapshot survey of National Health Service (NHS) trusts and to assay how radiographer staffing cover was provided for out-of-hours services.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A snapshot postal survey was mailed to heads of service of all 234 trusts in England and Wales. A literature search on the models of service delivery and correlation with the authors' internal MRI rota, which has provided a full on-call service for 20 years was undertaken.
RESULTS: The response rate was 45.7% (107 of 234); 14% of responders provided full access to MRI 24 h a day; 63% provided extended weekday service, typically to 20.00 h; and 81% provided a weekend daytime service. The radiographers running the service were typically from the core MRI team. Approximately one-third (29.9%) of trusts provided training in basic brain and spine MRI to non-core MRI team members, but they typically did not participate in out-of-hours provision.
CONCLUSION: There is currently a paucity of information on the provision of out-of-hours MRI in the NHS. However, there is increasing pressure to provide complex imaging out of hours, and in the future, trauma centres may be required to provide MRI to assess spinal injury. The authors describe a system to provide access to MRI at no additional cost to the organization based on 20 years of experience. A minority of surveyed acute NHS trusts have full out-of-hours access to MRI. Demand for MRI provision out of core hours is likely to increase.
Copyright © 2013 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23352762     DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2012.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  6 in total

1.  Delaying laparoscopic surgery in pregnant patients with an equivocal acute appendicitis: a step-wise approach does not affect maternal or fetal safety.

Authors:  James Tankel; Shlomo Yellinek; Yonat Shechter; Dmitry Greenman; Alexander Ioscovich; Sorina Grisaru-Granovsky; Petachia Reissman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Urgent decisions and a tight spot: embolic infarction of a herniated cerebellar tonsil.

Authors:  Ruth Mc Donagh; David Bradley; Joseph Augustine Harbison
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2016-08-03

3.  Reliability analysis of the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system by a worldwide group of naïve spinal surgeons.

Authors:  Christopher K Kepler; Alexander R Vaccaro; John D Koerner; Marcel F Dvorak; Frank Kandziora; Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran; Bizhan Aarabi; Luiz R Vialle; Michael G Fehlings; Gregory D Schroeder; Maximilian Reinhold; Klaus John Schnake; Carlo Bellabarba; F Cumhur Öner
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Out of hours magnetic resonance imaging for suspected cauda equina syndrome: lessons from a comparative study across two centres.

Authors:  A Silva; B Sachdev; M Kostusiak; Mubarak Yousif; G Flint; J Dhir; N Furtado; R Laing
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.951

5.  A Retrospective Evaluation of Critical Care Blood Culture Yield - Do Support Services Contribute to the "Weekend Effect"?

Authors:  Ben Morton; Shankara Nagaraja; Andrea Collins; Shaun H Pennington; John D Blakey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Laparoscopic negative appendectomy during pregnancy is associated with adverse neonatal outcome.

Authors:  Misgav Rottenstreich; James Tankel; Naama Vilk Ayalon; Reut Rotem; Shlomo Yellinek; Fayez Khatib; Sorina Grisaru-Granovsky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.584

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.