Literature DB >> 23352673

IV access in bleeding trauma patients: a performance review.

Paul T Engels1, Edward Passos, Andrew N Beckett, Jeffrey D Doyle, Homer C Tien.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Exsanguinating haemorrhage is a leading cause of death in severely injured trauma patients. Management includes achieving haemostasis, replacing lost intravascular volume with fluids and blood, and treating coagulopathy. The provision of fluids and blood products is contingent on obtaining adequate vascular access to the patient's venous system. We sought to examine the nature and timing of achieving adequate intravenous (IV) access in trauma patients requiring uncrossmatched blood in the trauma bay.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients admitted to our trauma centre from 2005 to 2009 who were transfused uncrossmatched blood in the trauma bay. We examined the impact of IV access on prehospital times and time to first PRBC transfusion.
RESULTS: Of 208 study patients, 168 (81%) received prehospital IV access, and the on-scene time for these patients was 5 min longer (16.1 vs 11.4, p<0.01). Time to achieving adequate IV access in those without any prehospital IVs occurred on average 21 min (6.6-30.5) after arrival to the trauma bay. A central venous catheter was placed in 92 (44%) of patients. Time to first blood transfusion correlated most strongly with time to achieving central venous access (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.94, p<0.001) as opposed to time to achieving adequate peripheral IV access (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.19, p=0.12).
CONCLUSIONS: We found that most bleeding patients received a prehospital IV; however, we also found that obtaining prehospital IVs was associated with longer EMS on-scene times and longer prehospital times. Interestingly, we found that obtaining a prehospital IV was not associated with more rapid initiation of blood product transfusion. Obtaining optimal IV access and subsequent blood transfusion in severely injured patients continues to present a challenge.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Central venous catheter; Intraosseous; Intravenous; Quality indicators; Resuscitation; Trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23352673     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.12.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  3 in total

1.  The intraosseous have it: A prospective observational study of vascular access success rates in patients in extremis using video review.

Authors:  Kristen M Chreiman; Ryan P Dumas; Mark J Seamon; Patrick K Kim; Patrick M Reilly; Lewis J Kaplan; Jason D Christie; Daniel N Holena
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.313

2.  Ensuring adequate vascular access in patients with major trauma: a quality improvement initiative.

Authors:  Kevin Verhoeff; Rachelle Saybel; Pamela Mathura; Bonnie Tsang; Vanessa Fawcett; Sandy Widder
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2018-01-09

3.  Does it matter who places the intravenous? An inter-professional comparison of prehospital intravenous access difficulties between physicians and paramedics.

Authors:  Johannes Prottengeier; Jan-Niklas Maier; Christine Gall; Sebastian Heinrich; Joachim Schmidt; Torsten Birkholz
Journal:  Eur J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.799

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.