Literature DB >> 23352656

Experts' opinion: Recommendations for retesting breast cancer metastases for HER2 and hormone receptor status.

Frédérique Penault-Llorca1, Renata A Coudry2, Wedad M Hanna3, Robert Y Osamura4, Josef Rüschoff5, Giuseppe Viale6.   

Abstract

The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and hormone receptor status of recurrent breast cancer may change between the tumor and metastases from negative to positive and vice versa, potentially affecting the treatment regimen. Retesting of metastases may therefore be crucial to allow appropriate selection of patients for whom targeted therapy is indicated; however, retesting is not routinely performed. This article recommends that metastases be retested for HER2 and hormone receptor status and provides practical guidance on when and how to retest, as agreed by a panel of expert pathologists with extensive experience of HER2 and hormone receptor testing.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23352656     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  7 in total

Review 1.  Obstacles to precision oncology: confronting current factors affecting the successful introduction of biomarkers to the clinic.

Authors:  Ludmila Prudkin; Paolo Nuciforo
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 6.730

2.  Concomitant detection of HER2 protein and gene alterations by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and silver enhanced in situ hybridization (SISH) identifies HER2 positive breast cancer with and without gene amplification.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Varga; Raymond R Tubbs; Holger Moch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Contrasting breast cancer molecular subtypes across serial tumor progression stages: biological and prognostic implications.

Authors:  Siker Kimbung; Anikó Kovács; Anna Danielsson; Pär-Ola Bendahl; Kristina Lövgren; Marianne Frostvik Stolt; Nicholas P Tobin; Linda Lindström; Jonas Bergh; Zakaria Einbeigi; Mårten Fernö; Thomas Hatschek; Ingrid Hedenfalk
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-10-20

4.  3rd ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 3).

Authors:  F Cardoso; A Costa; E Senkus; M Aapro; F André; C H Barrios; J Bergh; G Bhattacharyya; L Biganzoli; M J Cardoso; L Carey; D Corneliussen-James; G Curigliano; V Dieras; N El Saghir; A Eniu; L Fallowfield; D Fenech; P Francis; K Gelmon; A Gennari; N Harbeck; C Hudis; B Kaufman; I Krop; M Mayer; H Meijer; S Mertz; S Ohno; O Pagani; E Papadopoulos; F Peccatori; F Penault-Llorca; M J Piccart; J Y Pierga; H Rugo; L Shockney; G Sledge; S Swain; C Thomssen; A Tutt; D Vorobiof; B Xu; L Norton; E Winer
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Chromogenic in Situ Hybridization Technique versus Immunohistochemistry in Assessment of HER2/neu Status in 448 Iraqi Patients with Invasive Breast Carcinoma.

Authors:  Ali Hussein Mohammed Ali; Alaa Qasim Yahya; Haider Latteef Mohammed
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2019-06-30

6.  Updated UK Recommendations for HER2 assessment in breast cancer.

Authors:  Emad A Rakha; Sarah E Pinder; John M S Bartlett; Merdol Ibrahim; Jane Starczynski; Pauline J Carder; Elena Provenzano; Andrew Hanby; Sally Hales; Andrew H S Lee; Ian O Ellis
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Discordance rate of HER2 status in primary breast carcinomas versus synchronous axillary lymph node metastases: a multicenter retrospective investigation.

Authors:  Antonio Ieni; Valeria Barresi; Rosario Caltabiano; Anna Maria Cascone; Rachele Del Sordo; Daniela Cabibi; Pio Zeppa; Salvatore Lanzafame; Angelo Sidoni; Vito Franco; Giovanni Tuccari
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 4.147

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.