Literature DB >> 23352581

Blinded assessment of operative performance after fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery in gynecology training.

Danielle D Antosh1, Tamika Auguste, Elizabeth A George, Andrew I Sokol, Robert E Gutman, Cheryl B Iglesia, Sameer Y Desale, Amy J Park.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine the pass rate for the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) examination among senior gynecology residents and fellows and to find whether there is an association between FLS scores and previous laparoscopic experience as well as laparoscopic intraoperative (OR) skills assessment.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
SETTING: Three gynecology residency training programs. PARTICIPANTS: Third- and fourth-year gynecology residents and urogynecology fellows.
INTERVENTIONS: All participants participated in the FLS curriculum, written and manual skills examination, and completed a survey reporting baseline characteristics and opinions. Fourth-year residents and fellows underwent unblinded and blinded pre- and post-FLS OR assessments. Objective OR assessments of fourth-year residents after FLS were compared with those of fourth-year resident controls who were not FLS trained.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-nine participants were included. The overall pass rate was 76%. The pass rate for third- and fourth-year residents and fellows were 62%, 85%, and 100%, respectively. A trend toward improvement in OR assessments was observed for fourth-year residents and fellows for pre-FLS curriculum compared with post-FLS testing, and FLS-trained fourth-year residents compared with fourth-year resident controls; however, this did not reach statistical significance. Self-report of laparoscopic case load experience of >20 cases was the only baseline factor significantly associated with passing the FLS examination (p = .03).
CONCLUSION: The FLS pass rate for senior residents and fellows was 76%, with higher pass rates associated with increasing levels of training and laparoscopic case experience.
Copyright © 2013 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23352581     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  4 in total

1.  FLS tasks can be used as an ergonomic discriminator between laparoscopic and robotic surgery.

Authors:  Ahmed M Zihni; Ikechukwu Ohu; Jaime A Cavallo; Jenny Ousley; Sohyung Cho; Michael M Awad
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  A scoping review of assessment tools for laparoscopic suturing.

Authors:  Elif Bilgic; Satoshi Endo; Ekaterina Lebedeva; Madoka Takao; Katherine M McKendy; Yusuke Watanabe; Liane S Feldman; Melina C Vassiliou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Validation of the VBLaST: A Virtual Peg Transfer Task in Gynecologic Surgeons.

Authors:  Christopher Awtrey; Amine Chellali; Steven Schwaitzberg; Suvranu De; Daniel Jones; Caroline Cao
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 4.137

4.  Assessment of laparoscopic training for gynecological malignancies using Thiel-embalmed human cadavers.

Authors:  Tomoka Usami; Toru Fujioka; Ayaka Yoshida; Hitomi Miyaue; Toshiaki Yasuoka; Yuka Uchikura; Kazuko Takagi; Yuko Matsubara; Takashi Matsumoto; Keiichi Matsubara; Takashi Sugiyama
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-09-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.