BACKGROUND AIMS: We completed a phase II clinical trial evaluating rapamycin-resistant allogeneic T cells (T-rapa) and now have evaluated a T-rapa product manufactured in 6 days (T-rapa(6)) rather than 12 days (T-Rapa(12)). METHODS: Using gene expression microarrays, we addressed our hypothesis that the two products would express a similar phenotype. The products had similar phenotypes using conventional comparison methods of cytokine secretion and surface markers. RESULTS: Unsupervised analysis of 34,340 genes revealed that T-rapa(6) and T-rapa(12) products clustered together, distinct from culture input CD4(+) T cells. Statistical analysis of T-rapa(6) products revealed differential expression of 19.3% of genes (n = 6641) compared with input CD4(+) cells; similarly, 17.8% of genes (n = 6147) were differentially expressed between T-rapa(12) products and input CD4(+) cells. Compared with input CD4(+) cells, T-rapa(6) and T-rapa(12) products were similar in terms of up-regulation of major gene families (cell cycle, stress response, glucose catabolism, DNA metabolism) and down-regulation (inflammatory response, immune response, apoptosis, transcriptional regulation). However, when directly compared, T-rapa(6) and T-rapa(12) products showed differential expression of 5.8% of genes (n = 1994; T-rapa(6) vs. T-rapa(12)). CONCLUSIONS: Second-generation T-rapa(6) cells possess a similar yet distinct gene expression profile relative to first-generation T-rapa(12) cells and may mediate differential effects after adoptive transfer. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND AIMS: We completed a phase II clinical trial evaluating rapamycin-resistant allogeneic T cells (T-rapa) and now have evaluated a T-rapa product manufactured in 6 days (T-rapa(6)) rather than 12 days (T-Rapa(12)). METHODS: Using gene expression microarrays, we addressed our hypothesis that the two products would express a similar phenotype. The products had similar phenotypes using conventional comparison methods of cytokine secretion and surface markers. RESULTS: Unsupervised analysis of 34,340 genes revealed that T-rapa(6) and T-rapa(12) products clustered together, distinct from culture input CD4(+) T cells. Statistical analysis of T-rapa(6) products revealed differential expression of 19.3% of genes (n = 6641) compared with input CD4(+) cells; similarly, 17.8% of genes (n = 6147) were differentially expressed between T-rapa(12) products and input CD4(+) cells. Compared with input CD4(+) cells, T-rapa(6) and T-rapa(12) products were similar in terms of up-regulation of major gene families (cell cycle, stress response, glucose catabolism, DNA metabolism) and down-regulation (inflammatory response, immune response, apoptosis, transcriptional regulation). However, when directly compared, T-rapa(6) and T-rapa(12) products showed differential expression of 5.8% of genes (n = 1994; T-rapa(6) vs. T-rapa(12)). CONCLUSIONS: Second-generation T-rapa(6) cells possess a similar yet distinct gene expression profile relative to first-generation T-rapa(12) cells and may mediate differential effects after adoptive transfer. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Jacopo Mariotti; Jason Foley; Unsu Jung; Todd Borenstein; Nermina Kantardzic; Soo Han; Joshua T Hanson; Elaine Wong; Nicole Buxhoeveden; Jane B Trepel; Antonio Tito Fojo; William Telford; Daniel H Fowler Journal: J Immunol Date: 2008-01-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Carsten Vogel; Alexander Bauer; Marion Wiesnet; Klaus T Preissner; Wolfgang Schaper; Hugo H Marti; Silvia Fischer Journal: J Cell Physiol Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 6.384
Authors: Michael A Weinreich; Kensuke Takada; Cara Skon; Steven L Reiner; Stephen C Jameson; Kristin A Hogquist Journal: Immunity Date: 2009-07-17 Impact factor: 31.745
Authors: Miriam E Mossoba; David C Halverson; Roger Kurlander; Bazetta Blacklock Schuver; Ashley Carpenter; Brenna Hansen; Seth M Steinberg; Syed Abbas Ali; Nishant Tageja; Frances T Hakim; Juan Gea-Banacloche; Claude Sportes; Nancy M Hardy; Dennis D Hickstein; Steven Z Pavletic; Hanh Khuu; Marianna Sabatini; David Stroncek; Bruce L Levine; Carl H June; Jacopo Mariotti; Olivier Rixe; Antonio Tito Fojo; Michael R Bishop; Ronald E Gress; Daniel H Fowler Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-06-12 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Shutong Liu; Luis F de Castro; Ping Jin; Sara Civini; Jiaqiang Ren; Jo-Anna Reems; Jose Cancelas; Ramesh Nayak; Georgina Shaw; Timothy O'Brien; David H McKenna; Myriam Armant; Leslie Silberstein; Adrian P Gee; Derek J Hei; Peiman Hematti; Sergei A Kuznetsov; Pamela G Robey; David F Stroncek Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-04-27 Impact factor: 4.379