Kirsta Schoeff1, Zia Chaudhuri, Joseph L Demer. 1. Jules Stein Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7002,USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Monkey neurophysiology suggests that changes in neural drive rather than extraocular muscle structure underlie sensory-induced strabismus. If this is true, then extraocular muscle structure should be normal. We used magnetic resonance imaging to measure horizontal rectus muscle size and contractility to determine whether muscle structure is a factor in human concomitant esotropia. METHODS: High-resolution, quasicoronal plane magnetic resonance imaging was performed in target-controlled central gaze, abduction, and adduction in 13 orthotropic controls (mean age, 38 ± 19 years) and 12 adults (mean age, 52 ± 16 years) who had concomitant esotropia averaging 28(Δ) ± 18(Δ) at distance. Thyroid ophthalmopathy was excluded. Horizontal rectus muscle cross sections were determined in 6 contiguous, 2-mm-thick midorbital image planes. Contractility was computed in each plane as the difference in cross section from contraction to relaxation. RESULTS: Medial rectus muscle cross sections in multiple planes averaged up to 39% larger in esotropic patients than in controls (P < 0.005), whereas lateral rectus muscle cross sections in esotropia were up to 28% larger but only significantly larger in one plane (P < 0.02). Medial rectus contractility was increased by up to 60% in esotropic patients (P < 0.005), whereas lateral rectus contractility in esotropia was slightly but not significantly supernormal. CONCLUSIONS: Medial rectus muscle size is supernormal and lateral rectus muscle size is not subnormal in concomitant esotropia. This finding indicates that human concomitant esotropia is associated with peripheral muscular abnormality.
PURPOSE: Monkey neurophysiology suggests that changes in neural drive rather than extraocular muscle structure underlie sensory-induced strabismus. If this is true, then extraocular muscle structure should be normal. We used magnetic resonance imaging to measure horizontal rectus muscle size and contractility to determine whether muscle structure is a factor in human concomitant esotropia. METHODS: High-resolution, quasicoronal plane magnetic resonance imaging was performed in target-controlled central gaze, abduction, and adduction in 13 orthotropic controls (mean age, 38 ± 19 years) and 12 adults (mean age, 52 ± 16 years) who had concomitant esotropia averaging 28(Δ) ± 18(Δ) at distance. Thyroid ophthalmopathy was excluded. Horizontal rectus muscle cross sections were determined in 6 contiguous, 2-mm-thick midorbital image planes. Contractility was computed in each plane as the difference in cross section from contraction to relaxation. RESULTS: Medial rectus muscle cross sections in multiple planes averaged up to 39% larger in esotropic patients than in controls (P < 0.005), whereas lateral rectus muscle cross sections in esotropia were up to 28% larger but only significantly larger in one plane (P < 0.02). Medial rectus contractility was increased by up to 60% in esotropic patients (P < 0.005), whereas lateral rectus contractility in esotropia was slightly but not significantly supernormal. CONCLUSIONS: Medial rectus muscle size is supernormal and lateral rectus muscle size is not subnormal in concomitant esotropia. This finding indicates that human concomitant esotropia is associated with peripheral muscular abnormality.
Authors: Sei Yeul Oh; Robert A Clark; Federico Velez; Arthur L Rosenbaum; Joseph L Demer Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Joseph L Demer; Robert A Clark; Reika Kono; Weldon Wright; Federico Velez; Arthur L Rosenbaum Journal: J AAPOS Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 1.220
Authors: Mark M G Walton; Adam Pallus; Jérome Fleuriet; Michael J Mustari; Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2017-04-12 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Mark M G Walton; Michael J Mustari; Christy L Willoughby; Linda K McLoon Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-11-20 Impact factor: 4.799