Literature DB >> 2335104

Progestational and androgenic receptor binding affinities and in vivo activities of norgestimate and other progestins.

A Phillips1, K Demarest, D W Hahn, F Wong, J L McGuire.   

Abstract

The progestational and androgenic in vitro receptor binding affinity and the in vivo activity of norgestimate was compared with that of its metabolites and other progestins. The relative binding affinities (RBAs) of norgestimate and its 17-deacetylated metabolite for rabbit uterine progestin receptors were similar to that of progesterone (P); those of 3-keto norgestimate and levonorgestrel were about five times that of P; those of gestodene and 3-keto desogestrel were about nine times that of P. The RBAs of norgestimate, P, and 3-keto norgestimate for rat prostatic androgen receptors were from 0.003 to 0.025 times that of dihydrotestosterone (DHT); those of 3-keto desogestrel, gestodene, and levonorgestrel were from 0.118 to 0.220 times that of DHT. The order of receptor level selectivity represented by the ratio of androgen:progestin IC50 values (with a greater ratio value reflecting a better selectivity) was norgestimate greater than P = 3-keto norgestimate greater than 17-deacetylated norgestimate greater than 3-keto desogestrel greater than gestodene greater than levonorgestrel. In vivo studies demonstrated similar profiles for norgestimate and its 17-deacetylated metabolite. These latter two steroids were equally potent as progestins in stimulating rabbit endometrium, and compared with the other progestins, both steroids exhibited minimal androgenicity as measured by the stimulation of rat prostate growth. In conclusion, these studies, as well as previous preclinical and clinical studies, provide evidence of the selectivity of norgestimate based on minimal androgenicity, indicating an improvement over other progestins used in oral contraceptives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2335104     DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(90)90039-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  10 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetics and potency of progestins used for hormone replacement therapy and contraception.

Authors:  Frank Z Stanczyk
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.514

2.  The role of progestogens in regulating matrix metalloproteinase activity in macrophages and microglial cells.

Authors:  Juliana Hwang-Levine; Frank Z Stanczyk; Howard N Hodis
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 3.  Progestogens used in postmenopausal hormone therapy: differences in their pharmacological properties, intracellular actions, and clinical effects.

Authors:  Frank Z Stanczyk; Janet P Hapgood; Sharon Winer; Daniel R Mishell
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 4.  Hormone replacement therapy: optimising the dose and route of administration.

Authors:  Valerie Montgomery Rice
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  Estradiol and norgestimate: a review of their combined use as hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  M P Curran; A J Wagstaff
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 6.  Comparative pharmacology of newer progestogens.

Authors:  H Kuhl
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  The influence of oral contraceptives on athletic performance in female athletes.

Authors:  Melonie Burrows; Charlotte E Peters
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetics, metabolism and serum concentrations of progestins used in contraception.

Authors:  Alexis J Bick; Renate Louw-du Toit; Salndave B Skosana; Donita Africander; Janet P Hapgood
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 13.400

9.  Quantification of 17-desacetyl norgestimate in human plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and its application to bioequivalence study.

Authors:  Ashish Saxena; Arun Kumar Gupta; V Praveen Kumar; M Sundaramoorthi Nainar; Manoj Bob; Ravisekhar Kasibhatta
Journal:  J Pharm Anal       Date:  2014-09-22

10.  Effects of oral contraceptives on spatial cognition depend on pharmacological properties and phase of the contraceptive cycle.

Authors:  Elizabeth Hampson; Erin E Morley; Kelly L Evans; Cathleen Fleury
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 6.055

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.